Friday, March 15th, 2013 at 10:15 am  |  102 responses

Doc Rivers Compares Avery Bradley’s Defense to Scottie Pippen


Avery Bradley is one of the NBA’s best defenders and pickpockets. He’s so good, in fact, that Boston Celtics head coach Doc Rivers likens being hounded by Bradley to the experience of going up against Scottie Pippen, one of the greatest defensive players of all-time. Per ESPN: “In 33 games this season, Bradley has produced 41 steals. Those 1.2 swipes per contest won’t put him among the league leaders, but it’s how he generates his thefts: hounding or baiting some of the league’s top ball-handlers — often before the midcourt stripe — and picking them clean for easy transition buckets. But that’s only part of Bradley’s defensive game, and his role in stabilizing the Celtics’ season cannot be understated. Boston, a team that has perennially ranked in the top 5 in defensive rating in the Kevin Garnett era, sat 14th in the league with an unsightly defensive rating of 102.1 on Jan. 1, the day before Bradley made his season debut after a pair of offseason shoulder surgeries shelved him for the first 30 games. Since Bradley’s return, Boston boasts a defensive rating of 96.9, the second-best mark in the league in that span (only Indiana has been better). It’s a big reason why, beset by three season-ending injuries including the loss of All-Star point guard Rajon Rondo, the Celtics are 21-13 since that point (and Bradley sat out one of those losses against Chicago). If not for the time he missed, it’s not far-fetched to say that Bradley deserves some consideration for the league’s Defensive Player of the Year award (or a spot on the league’s all-defense team at the very least). [...] ‘Avery’s return was bigger than people know,’ said Rivers. ‘It really was.’ [...] Rivers has taken to comparing Bradley to the likes of Scottie Pippen, Derek Harper, and Alvin Robertson, with Michael Jordan’s former running mate his favorite parallel. ‘It’s like Scottie Pippen — when you played the Bulls, you were praying that, ‘I hope he guards the other guy tonight,’ explained Rivers. ‘Because [Pippen] was one of those guys that could guard the 1, 2, or 3. And you were hoping, ‘OK, I hope [he guards the other guy].’ I mean, how rare is it that you want Michael to guard you? Over Scottie. And I’m thinking that’s Avery, and even Courtney [Lee]. Courtney’s a good defender as well, but they’re probably thinking, ‘I’ll take him over him.’ And [Bradley's] feet are so good. I mean, he stays in front of the ball, he gets up into it, and it’s big for us. He’s really making us a better defensive team.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    You realize Seattle was down 3-0 going into that game, and Nate McMillan & Hersey Hawkins shared time with Payton on Jordan right? That was the game that it looked like Chicago wasn’t ready to play. As an entire team.

  • LeroyShonuff

    Bradley get’s right in you and doesn’t leave. I wonder how good he would be if he played when you could hand check. He would be shutting players down. I mean the ref’s basically bailed Steph Curry from getting locked down with some phantom calls when they played a few weeks back

  • http://twitter.com/apowellAdvocate Allen Powell II

    Dude, did you read the definition you posted? Do you understand what “precise” means? Absolute, no deviation. As in a “precise” measurement. Just admit you used the wrong word. You meant mainly, or mostly, or something along those lines. It’s ok, everyone makes mistakes.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Yes, focusing on the topic is the idea when you start to comment. The words in that comment are what make the comment worth saying/reading/discussing. So still, the words are the whole idea.

  • http://twitter.com/apowellAdvocate Allen Powell II

    For real. It’s not the end of the world, clearly you just pulled a Reggie Miller.
    That means you repeated a common catchphrase, but in an inaccurate manner. Don’t be like Reggie.

  • LeroyShonuff

    He’s great defensively! He was briefly the number 1 recruit coming out of High School in the same class as John Wall. If Doc can teach this kid to run the pick and roll like a Damian Lillard, he can be a great two way player. His court vision is better than advertised too.

  • Dymez

    Only if the words pertain to the topic. The idea is to discuss the topic using words, not discuss the meaning of words. Nor discuss the meaning of a comments section on a particular website, which is why I’m pulling out of this meaningless discussion as well, as I have no damns left to give about it either.

  • LeroyShonuff

    True but Pippen allowed them to switch. Remember Pippen played point for that team to basically and he lead that fast break which was made off them tripping teams by using Pippen’s length and sideline to sideline quickness.

    It’s not the defense (illegal defense) but it allowed the Bulls to lock down one defenders and without a shot blocker and run a form of zone without getting caught. JVG use to go crazy to the refs about it when he coached the Knicks

  • LakeShow

    Dude… Just admit, Payton out physicalled Jordan a couple times. That’s not the big of a statement lol. A couple times isn’t much.

    My point wasn’t that Payton is stronger than Jordan or anything, just that he is stronger than Bradley, by quite a margin.

    Why didn’t Jordan post up on the Glove? He kept trying to shoot over him to no avail… I would have posted if I were Jordan, unless he thought Glove was to tough down in the post. He had the height the supposed strength, yet he did not.

    In that game it was Payton on Jordan for the majority of the game.

  • Gdub513

    So we gonna’ pretend like Kyrie Irving didn’t cook this dude two months ago? Oh, okay…

  • http://twitter.com/apowellAdvocate Allen Powell II

    You are stretching it with that 20 a little. Scottie topped out as a scorer at 22 a game and he only hit 20 a few times. He was a better version of Igoudala most likely.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Payton guarded him better than anyone. He didn’t out muscle him. That’s all I’m saying. .
    And Bradley is stronger than Payton, anyway.

  • spit hot fiyah

    that’s a very good point, if hand checking was still allowed you might as well call for sub if you this guy is about to guard you

  • LakeShow

    So your just gunna pretend like Avery Bradley is not a good defender because a great offensive player was cookin?
    Oh, okay…

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    If you are trying to discuss something, and use words that have a different meaning then what you meant, then doing what you want to do is impossible. Say what you mean, and nobody will focus on you misusing the English language.

  • LakeShow

    No Bradley is not…
    Payton was super strong man. Like really really strong.
    Your right that he didn’t out muscle him overall, just on a few select plays and he kept Jordan away from the post. I don’t think Jordan scored on Payton on a post move a single time in that game. Not that I can recall. MJ was launching jumpers all game. If Jordan could out muscle him, we wouldn’t know because he didn’t.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Jordan shot fadeaway’s from the post anyway. Saying Payton out muscled him is like saying Kidd out muscled LeBron in 2011 because LeBron didn’t post up.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Both of them are listed at 6’2″ 180lb’s. and then look at them. Bradley sure looks a lot stronger

  • Dymez

    I said what I meant, then it was misunderstood in a reply, so I clarified what I meant for the benefit of the discussion. Even if I wasn’t clear the first time, I made myself clear right after it. Now, everything that comes after that, is people just digging at the wrong thing — not my problem.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    You said strictly. You didn’t mean it. And then argued the meaning of the word. You clarified, but also defended your misuse of the word in the process. In essence you clarified but only to defend yourself. Not for the sake of the conversation, but to avoid just saying you were wrong.

  • LakeShow

    No where is Payton listed as 6’2″…
    He’s easily 6’4″
    They are lying if he is listed as such.

    Payton may not look like much, but he is as strong a PG as there ever was. Don’t let his lack of big pecks and biceps fool you.
    He was very strong.

  • LakeShow

    Although Kidd didn’t out muscle him… Bron should have posted!! haha

  • http://twitter.com/_DFrance DFrance

    I just love the fact that he wants to play tough defense. Paul George, LeBron, Iggy are all great defenders and they will lock you up when they have to but Bradley just does it naturally. I’m sure Doc doesn’t make him pick up full court most times, he just wants to. It’s refreshing.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Basketball-reference lists both of them that. And both of them are 6’4″ in sneakers. Bradley is also a shooting guard. Payton was a very strong point guard. Bradley is a very strong SG. I don’t know if you’ve seen him match up, but he’s pretty close to Dwyane Wade physically.

  • Sérgio

    Bosh got injured in the Indiana series, but returned in game 5 of the Boston series.

  • Dymez

    Lol! I know some of you guys that be on the Internet be dictators and all, but in reality, you can’t tell me what I did or did not mean, or attempted to do. Only I have that control. Now, if I comment and you take it whatever way you take it, that’s fine; if you take it wrong, for the sake of the discussion, I’ll let you know exactly what I meant by it (which I did), and that’s that. Anything after that, if it’s not about the original topic — I’m no child, I can’t stick on minor things — so I just don’t care. Sorry, bro, that’s just reality.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    words have meanings. whether you meant to do something is irrelevant. what you did is what matters in terms of language. it’s spoken. it has meaning. you don’t control what they mean. i don’t control what they mean. that’s why we are able to communicate, because the words have meanings outside of our control.
    .
    you said something you didn’t mean. it’s ok. get over it.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    ahhh, my bad you are right. that is the second time i have made this mistake.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Harper played point by definition. Although Pippen initiated a heap of the offense during his whole career. But Harper was the point guard. He was the reason they were able to switch. BJ Armstrong and John Paxson before him did not give the team that luxury.

    .

    Phil Jackson did the same thing in LA with Harper, Bryant, and George/Fox. It wasn’t because of Pippen. It was because of Harper.

    .

    Who before he came to Chicago was a top 10 SG.

  • http://twitter.com/apowellAdvocate Allen Powell II

    That is a lie sir.

    Jordan shot a horrible percentage against Payton the three games he guarded him. Go run the numbers. It was horrible by any standard. He had one good game, but the rest were horrible. Check the game logs. 31.9 percent from the field in the first game, 50 percent in the next game, and 26 percent in the last game. It was the best defense ever played on Jordan. Unfortunately, George Karl didn’t make that switch until they were down 3-0.
    And in the game where he shot 50 percent he needed 22 shots to get 26 points.

  • Dymez

    I control what I mean and I know what I meant. Hence why we have a word in the English language called “clarification,” just in case one doesn’t understand what the other meant, he/she can clear up confusion, solely avoid situations like this. Which doesn’t work with a specific group of people, obviously, because they want to drag out a pointless topic. But, yes, your last 3 words. 3 words I’ve been describing for so long in this back and forth series of comments: Get over it.

  • EP

    Being compared to Pippen = The ultimate defensive compliment

  • http://twitter.com/apowellAdvocate Allen Powell II

    Nah, this isn’t true.
    The meanings of words are determined by the people who speak them and the people who hear them. The process of communication, at its core, involves encoding-distribution-decoding. Dymez’s message was decoded by everyone based on the standard meaning of the word strictly while he was using some personal definition.

  • LakeShow

    lol,
    this guy…

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    yes that’s fair. Although still, Payton wasn’t on Jordan for the entirety of game 4 (McMillan in his comeback game, and Hawkins in the first quartish were on Jordan). And in game 5 Jordan did shoot 50%.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    lol exactly.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    The meaning of words, in group-speak are determined by a group. Typically, the Dictionary is the representative for the group.
    .
    *Scrabble would be a mess without definitions.
    .
    He should have just used the word he meant, instead of making up his own definition. We aren’t arguing over the use of slang. We are arguing over the use of an adjective.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Clarification works two ways. We clarified to you, what your words actually meant. And you clarified, that you improperly used that word. Except, you are STILL defending your own imaginary definition of the word. And if you don’t want us to correct you? again, just use the right word. Or get over it. Or we could keep going? go ahead.

  • http://twitter.com/apowellAdvocate Allen Powell II

    I don’t disagree. What I’m noting is the idea that there are set meanings to words, or that they aren’t fluid is wrong. But, in this case he just misused a catchphrase and didn’t want to admit he was incorrect.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    ok your right i should clarify, i’m only talking about in this context. where he is in a comment section, conversing with a group of people using the same language. there shouldn’t need to be interpretation of more than an idea.

  • Dymez

    Jesus Christ, you’re still on this? Get over it, buddy.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    ECHO

  • ATL dynamite

    If he gets himself a consistent jump shot… it will be his time to take off

  • LeroyShonuff

    True but in the triangle a classical “point guard” is not needed. Harper did allow them to switch because of his height (6’6) but make no mistake that it was Pippen who was the engine to that.

    Them Lakers teams and the 1st Bulls 3peat teams was different defensively because they had a Big who could control the paint (Shaq and Bill Cartwright). The 2nd Bulls team would often close games with Harper, Jordan, Pippen, Rodman and Kukoc. Not exactly a team that locks down the paint but they was soo successful having Harper, Jordan and especially Pippen (who could guard 1-4 and even some 5′s. The critical block of Ostertag in game 5 of the 98 finals I believe being proof).

    Harper was additional piece but make no mistake without Pippen that team does not go.

  • LeroyShonuff

    Bradley is a point guard he is only listened at SG because of Rondo. And Payton is stronger than Bradley. Payton had what you would call Grown Man Strength. He didn’t need to have puffed up muscles (Corey Maggette) dude would just out muscle you. And yes Payton did give Jordan fits and it was George Karl who lost that series by not switching Payton earlier and ignoring Kemp (who was killing Rodman) by playing Sam Perkins waaayyy too many mins looking for a size advantage.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Bradley is a 2. He can play the 1, but he’s a 2.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Why did you say all of this nonsense? The point was about the defense they played and why they were able to play it. I don’t need an explanation of the difference in every team. .
    And no, Pippen didn’t a could guard Centers. A block doesn’t even kind of prove otherwise. Unless you are next going to argue Nate Robinson could guard Yao Ming……

  • LeroyShonuff

    Totally different. Nate got his off an angle Pippen got his off a switch which the bulls did often. He didn’t guard centers often but if he was caught on one it didn’t kill you.

    The explanation shows the difference in styles and reliance on talent which determines scheme. Hence my point

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Nobody was talking about the nuances of each team. Just why the Bulls were able to run their pseudo matchup zone on the perimeter (and I just used used the Lakers to illustrate that reason). Again, I don’t know why you said all of this nonsense. I appreciate that you took the time to say all of that but I’m not trying to break all this down, was just trying to stay within the conversation.

  • JL

    unless you’re a big man, then you probably want Bill Russell. Robinson, Mourning and Mutumbo are real good compliments too! Where have all the skilled (offensively) big men who can still play D and rebound gone? Most skilled big men are from Europe, and the defenders and rebounds from the states.

Advertisement