Thursday, August 27th, 2009 at 11:23 am  |  80 responses

(Re)Introducing the SLAMonline Top 50

The definitive ranking of the best players in the NBA is back!

SLAMonline Top 50

by Ryne Nelson

There are moments when we say, Damn, the NBA is almost here! We know exactly what those moments are. Because we nearly forget them until they happen, actually. And when they come, we pretend to be caught by surprise and allow ourselves to get hyped just as we did the year before. These moments remind us how time, no matter how it may drudge on, keeps making the same things fresh.

Today has become one of those moments for SLAMonline readers and writers alike. Whenever the Top 50 countdown begins, we just know the regular season is on its way. We began preparing during the first week of August. Because it’s meant to be SLAMonline’s list — as opposed to a single person’s list — no contributor will (or should be expected to) agree with the placement of every player in the Top 50. More important was that we agreed on the method by which the list was conceived. We did. And here’s how we did it…

First thing was first: choosing criteria. Farmer Jones submitted the most succinct explanation, one we easily agreed upon: “Who, based on what you expect them to contribute ON THE COURT this season, are the 50 best players in the NBA?” So that question is your answer. The 2009 SLAMonline Top 50 is our early, super extended, MVP predictions.

In order to truly call this a site-wide list, every contributor needed an equal voice. We looked to the NBA for a model and ended up using a modified MVP voting system. Everyone who wanted to contribute to this year’s “definitive ranking of the best players in the NBA” had to submit a Top 50 list of their own. I won’t say how many people contributed last year, but, 2009 kicked 2008′s ass. Thirty-one, yeah, 31 of the most tenured SLAMonline contributors and editors took part in this year’s rankings.

Talk about a list that got better with age.

Condensing 31 lists into one might sound complicated at first, but when you’re dealing with so many numbers, keeping it simple is the way to go. I’ll say it one sentence: The sum of the a player’s rankings determined his final position in the SLAMonline Top 50. Confused? For instance… If I ranked University of Illinois’ Deron Williams first on my list, he would get one arbitrary point. If someone else thought DWill is the ninth-best player (clearly delusional, but OK), nine points would be added to Deron’s total. He would have 10 total points, and the process continued until Deron Williams’ total points were tallied.

Deron’s sum was then matched against the totals for every player with a Top 50 vote. How did DWill rank against the likes of Brandon Roy, Al Jefferson, Derrick Rose, Steve Nash, Dwyane Wade and the rest? I, of course, couldn’t tell you. That’s what our writers are here for.

Lang will kick off the 2009 SLAMonline Top 50 list tomorrow with No. 50. Each post will go live at 8 a.m., six days a week (yeah, we’re workin’ Saturdays now!), until the final weekend before the season.

If you haven’t already, go ahead and pinch yourself. This is real. Another season’s right around the corner, and it’ll be here sooner than you can count to 50.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags:

  • http://slamonline.com Brad Long

    For everyone who thinks it’s a forgone conclusion that Kobe will be number one because of the ring, pump your breaks. It’s about who they think will contribute the most on the court NEXT season. Given the addition of Artest, Kobe may not have to score as much next year and on most nights he probably won’t be asked to guard the other teams best perimeter player. It doesn’t mean that he isn’t the best player in league, it just means that he may not have to do as much in order for his team to have the best shot at repeating.

  • Sparker

    last year there was some doubt about kobe/lebron. don’t see that as debatable, at least as of today. interesting to see how much chris paul will drop and how much dwight will rise. and with respect, i still find the question tough to answer. what about gil? i EXPECT he’ll be awesome. same with manu. but who the hell knows?

  • http://slamonline.com/ Ryne Nelson

    Exactly, Brad. Past awards don’t (er, shouldn’t) factor into this list.

  • chingy

    Young C: Il Mago could very well be #50 (I’d certainly have him in 45-50 range); but I’d have to disagree with you on KD > Melo…Melo remember is playoff tested and IMO the best offensive player not named Kobe

  • Overtime

    Would be cool if there was a little bit at the top of each post saying where they were ranked last year…just an idea

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    This is going to be so funny.

  • rog123

    Kobe better not be ranked number 1. This is player rankings not team rankings. Lebron better reg and post season stats

  • Overtime

    Why would Chris Paul drop?

  • http://www.slamonline.com melvin ely

    @Overtime: I think it’s because we were given a glimpse of how bad he was schooled by chauncy in last year’s playoffs. Despite being physically superior than billups was, he was outplayed by him throughout that series. I know we don’t factor in previous seasons into this thing, but that’s what I mostly remember from CP’s last playoff run.

  • http://www.anwilson.blogspot.com rainman10

    Is Darko #50?

  • Quail

    I bet greg oLden is #50.

  • http://www.anwilson.blogspot.com rainman10

    How many teams have 4 players on this list? Orlando, Boston, San Antonio, Lakers? If the Grizzlies sign Iverson do they have 4 on the list, or does Randolph’s 20-10 not get the love? (That is a statement following my assumption that Mayo, Gay, and Iverson make it) This is my favorite part of the Slamonline season.

  • http://www.anwilson.blogspot.com rainman10

    I guess it is a question actually*

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    Who were the 31 contributors?
    All people who ‘work’ for SLAM?
    What about just online commenters?
    I want a list of that too please.
    Also, I think Jukai will be happy now that he knows there is a criteria haha.

  • http://www.manutd.com Z

    It’s not because you win a ring that you’re better individually. Kobe didn’t do anything this time around that he had not done against Boston. The numbers are identical. The team was better. KG didn’t get better individually with the ring, more accomplished yes, but not better. We know who’s the best player in the league and he’s the one who PLAYED better in the reg season and in the playoffs.

  • http://www.manutd.com Z

    Kobe, Lamar and Pau, I can totally see it. I’m not sure that Artest is Top 50. Bynum is nowhere close to Top 50. C’mon now.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Pardeep

    Kobe 1st. D-Wade 2nd. LeBron 3rd.- LOL Yeah right! nobodys putting LeBron 3rd on any list.

  • http://www.mynameinblue.blogspot.com Hisham

    #50 hasn’t even been posted yet and we’re already debating #1?

  • http://slamonline.com acethat 56

    1st LbJ 2nd kobe 3rd wade 4th melo 5th dirk 6th cp3 7th dwight 8th D.wills 9th….brain farts

  • Jeter

    #50 Kwame Brown

  • http://Www.lkz.ch/basket Darksaber

    Cosign Hish (as usual). Relax people, let’s enjoy this like a glass of fine, nicely aged wine. Then again, we live in the age of “instant gratification”. Oh well.

  • Darko

    Cant wait….

  • Furious

    It clearly says “Who, based on what you expect them to contribute ON THE COURT this season, are the 50 best players in the NBA?”
    Therefore Kobe’s ring from last year shouldn’t mean anything. Neither does Wade’s. Its based on what they think will happen this season. Or at least they say it is, no doubt Kobe will be ranked high because he “finally got a ring without Shaq”, but he won’t be as effective as he used to, and shouldn’t be number 2.

  • http://slamonline.com Jhaney

    No debate about who is #1 this year. Kobe Bryant is #1 not only because he won a ring last year, but he will take on the challenge of being even better with Ron Artist on board. Be affraid Kobe haters, the quest for #5 starts now.

  • B_Easy24

    At least Kobe is still # 1 and that’s all that counts to me right now.

  • Clark

    Anyone else smell that bs? Yeah, that’s Iverson getting #50. And no, I’m not saying he should be higher on the list. I’m saying that if a player is the 50th best player in the league, someone besides the Grizzlies would want him…

  • ?????

    Somebody please explain how they got OJ Mayo ahead of Ben Gordon…..and how they aint even got Derrick Rose on the list. Like….its a reason he went 1 and would still go one if they had the draft tomorrow…or the next day…or any day. I see you still on that OJ Mayo hype. Rudy Gay is the best player on that team. Look out for that man this season. And really…..where is Kevin Durant…..and why is Dirk Nowitzki above him?

  • http://slamonline.com/ Tzvi Twersky

    @?????? D Rose hasn’t been listed YET, maybe because the list is only up 46. We still have 45 spots to go. Also, Gordon/Mayo is def. something that can be argued. But we chose Mayo. And you’re looking at last years list with Dirk/Durant.

  • Clark

    Agreed that Gordon should not be behind Mayo. Apparently none of these people watched the playoffs…..

  • http://nbacheapseats.blogspot.com Chendaddy

    This is why I keep coming back to Slam. You don’t write a Top 50 LIST. You write an entire article devoted to every pick in the top 50. That’s how it should be done. Just like how Slam did the mock draft better than anyone else. I will disagree with 90% of all the rankings, but I love the effort regardless. One small criticism. I think the ranking system might’ve been a little more accurate if you counted a vote for #1 to be 50 pts, #2 to be 49 pts, and so forth onto #50 being 1 pt. This way, not being on a list gives a player the true number of votes he should get from that list: 0. Just because someone put Kwame Brown #35 on a list doesn’t mean all other 30 contributors thought he was #51. His true average score is probably in the 300′s, but because somebody put him on his list, Kwame ends up being 50.5.

Advertisement