Saturday, August 29th, 2009 at 8:00 am  |  164 responses

Top 50: Josh Howard, no. 49

The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players.

by Joey Whelan

The classic form of the tragic hero always has one flaw that ultimately brings about his downfall. For Othello it’s his unyielding jealousy, Macbeth succumbed to his blinding aJosh Howardmbition and King Lear struggled with his egotism. For Josh Howard, it is his propensity for full disclosure. While these character faults may have led to an eventual tragic ending for the literary lead men mentioned above, the jury is still somewhat out on the Mavericks swingman.

While Howard’s numbers have always been good at every turn of his career, he hasn’t always gotten his due and it’s hard not to think that the off the court issues haven’t had something to do with that. As an elite player coming out of Wake Forest, the former Demon Deacon slipped to the bottom of the first round in 2003 where Dallas was waiting with open arms. Since joining the League, there have been some questionable comments, such as the remarks he made in 2008 in regards to his recreational use of marijuana and the national anthem debacle later that same year. All this has served to do is mask a remarkable basketball player behind the regrettable façade of a troublemaker.

Howard’s constant hustle and effort belie his physical giftedness as an athlete. He offers everything a GM could want in a perimeter player: size, length and quickness. Yet, there he is, just as likely to dive on the floor for a loose ball as he is to sky for a thunderous dunk in transition. Perhaps in that way Howard is less like the tragic heroes of Shakespearian lore, but draws more parallels with the most polarizing of characters from Homer’s The Iliad, the legendary Achilles.

The greatest warrior of his time (we’re told) and said to be the bravest of all men, rarely do Achilles actions reflect his reputation, at least when not fighting away on the field of battle. The reverse would be true for the “reputation” that Howard has earned in the public eye: a tremendously gifted, weed-smoking athlete, who hustles like he’s the 12th man on the bench getting his compensatory two minutes of playing time in a 30-point blowout.

Then there is the inherent value of the mere presence of these individuals. The Greeks believed they would be unsuccessful in their attempts to sack Troy without the help of Achilles, even though their army featured some of the greatest warriors in literary history. The same can be said for the Mavericks, who despite boasting a collection of talented players, including one of the premier offensive weapons the NBA features in Dirk Nowitzki, were only given a strong chance of beating the Spurs in last year’s playoffs with the understanding that Howard would be healthy and ready to perform.

Notice I’m not drawing parallels between Achilles dying as a result of an arrow to his heal and Howard dealing with ankle issues – that would be too easy. But it should be noted that having their sixth year swingman in the lineup did provide Dallas with a tremendous psychological boost against San Antonio. Is it a coincidence that the Mavs won 64 percent off their games with Howard during the regular season versus only 56 percent without? No, not at all, but the difficult thing about Howard is that his intrinsic value can’t necessarily be quantified by looking at the numbers.

Yes he can score in a variety of ways, yes he can rebound well from the perimeter and yes he is a solid defender, but Howard’s place on this list is due more to what Dallas lacks when he isn’t on the floor. Howard helps keep the heat off Dirk by being another scoring threat on the floor. Howard allows Dallas to keep Jason Kidd on the floor even though the aging veteran can’t cover a broomstick, because he can cover the opposition’s elite perimeter player night in and night out. Perhaps most importantly for this year, given the offseason acquisition of Shawn Marion, he presents the necessary versatility to move around in the starting rotation.

Having lined up as the small forward for the majority of his time in Big D, Howard will almost assuredly be relegated to playing the off-guard spot for a significant amount of the time he is on the floor. That doesn’t mean he won’t shift back to the three when Marion is cooling his jets, but The Matrix will have first dibs on that spot. So therein lays one of the potential reasons why it is Howard drops 12 spots in this year’s list. Maybe we’re anticipating some growing pains playing at a new position (even though there isn’t much between the two and the three), maybe there are concerns about how well Howard will recover from offseason ankle surgery. Maybe his simple absence from a good part of last season has made us forget how good he can be.

Regardless of how or why Howard slipped this year, the mere fact of the matter is he belongs on this list because of how much his team’s success is tied to him. There are a plethora of great “secondary” players in the League, but few carry the x-factor label like he does and few have sparked as much controversy. Is Dallas’s most controversial star destined to succumb to his own shortcomings and be remembered for what could have been rather than what was? Hopefully no, but there’s little question that with training camp on the horizon this protagonist will likely be serving another lead role in his own literary drama.

Notes
• Rankings are based solely on projected ’09-10 performance.
• Contributors to this list include: Jake Appleman, Brett Ballantini, Russ Bengtson, Toney Blare, Shannon Booher, Myles Brown, Franklyn Calle, Gregory Dole, Emry DowningHall, Jonathan Evans, Adam Fleischer, Jeff Fox, Sherman Johnson, Aaron Kaplowitz, John Krolik, Holly MacKenzie, Ryne Nelson, Chris O’Leary, Ben Osborne, Alan Paul, Susan Price, Sam Rubenstein, Khalid Salaam, Kye Stephenson, Adam Sweeney, Vincent Thomas, Tzvi Twersky, Justin Walsh, Joey Whelan, Eric Woodyard, and Nima Zarrabi.
• Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , ,

  • http://www.alllooksame.com Tarzan Cooper

    josh was correct regarding the “national anthem”

  • http://Nationofmillions.ca Ciolkstar

    Big fan of both Scola and Brooks. That Rocket team was great to watch against LA. But, Neither cat is top 50 right now. They could produce like top 50 players because the Rockets are hamstrung by TMac and Yao’s injuries and they’ll get big minutes. Scola might be close though. If he can maintain that kind of productivity and efficiency for 36-40 minutes a night, he’d have to be in the mix. And I love Jeff Green, but I’m not even sure if he’s top 50. He could be there before long.
    How about Thaddeus Young though? He’s gonna be a monster once the 76ets realize he’s better than (or atleast ad good as) Iguodala…

  • http://www.anwilson.blogspot.com rainman10

    Teddy the list is NBA basketball, not what a player did in one international contest. I think Green could score 28 in a sloppy game against that US team, which is what happened for Scola. If you want to talk scoring I’ve never seen Scola average 16 a game or even score 30 in a game. I am not saying Green will be on this list, but he would have a better chance than Scola. We should change the subject about how I hope Mo Williams doesn’t make the list.

  • Teddy-the-Bear

    James, why the heck would Iverson come off the bench for CHARLOTTE?

  • Dyce

    Howard deserves a way higher ranking, if its going on the 09-10….He played hurt the majority of the year and when healthy he is an all-star or at least borderline…Some of you are crazy saying Iverson should be higher than him. He isnt in his class as a career but today give me josh before him.

  • VA

    He’s good but he sucks after the 1st quarter. He averages like 7 pts in the 1st quarter and then like 8 pts in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th quarter.

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    I don’t have any issue with Green, Horford etc. They’re both good (and young) players, but considering the criteria is what the players are expected to contribute on the court THIS upcoming season, Brooks and Scola are both capable and NEED to take heavier roles for their teams – and that’s a fact. Green will NOT, because of Harden, Durant and Westrbook being there. The SAME with Horford, especially now that Joe Smith and Collins (lol) are there, and J-Creezy is in the ATL too.
    There is less pressure for them to produce statistically or take leadership roles on the court. Brooks, as a PG will need to do that. Same goes with Scola as the only consistent interior presence. His age and leaderhship will also come into play heavily.
    So, I think I’m right in saying that the 2 Rockets players are expected and, more importantly, REQUIRED to contribute more heavily for their squad than Horford or Green.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I’m really curious about why exactly Josh Howard is expected to be great this season despite the fact that he’ll likely be playing out of position the entire year and splitting minutes with Jason Terry?
    Hmmmm….

  • tavoris

    Allenp, I don’t think he’ll have that big of an adjustment tothe 2, since he’s been playing as an undersized 3 his whole career anyway.

  • ab_40

    64 percent off their games with Howard during the regular season versus only 56 percent

    you sir are dumb haha didn’t know there was a 110 percent but hey gotta do what you gotta doe right?

  • tavoris

    ab_40, they stated that the Mavs won 64% of the games they played with Josh Howard, as opposed to 56% of the games he didn’t play in. You don’t add those percentages-you compare them.

  • Mack

    (@ BETCATS nice of you to post the first SIX comments)

    I love how people just criticize as soon as one thing goes down. Howard said some stupid things obviously (the national anthem is hilariously dumb) but the weed thing was and still is way overblown, Howard is an outstanding basketball player. People seriously need to look at what he does on the court and not worry about him off it. He’s not dogfighting or anything like that, wtf do you care what he does in his off time?

  • tavoris

    Mack…leave Vick out of this…lol

  • http://nbacheapseats.blogspot.com Chendaddy

    Liked the article. Disagree with the position. Josh Howard is better than #49 just like Allen Iverson is worse than #50 right now. But I’ll see who you’ve got listed above #49.

    Btw, Howard calling that timeout that he later denied was the third biggest reason that Dallas lost the 2006 championship. The second is Dirk wrapping his hands around his own throat and squeezing, and the first is Dwyane Wade’s 18.5 free throw attempts per Miami win in the Finals (he averaged 10.1 per game that entire season up until Game 3).

Advertisement