• September 10, 2009 8:00 am  |  87 Comments

    Top 50: LaMarcus Aldridge, 39

    The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players.

    by Kye Stephenson

    Hello, my name is Rasheed Wallace. Since I may not make the SLAMonline Top 50 this year, and considering my career is just about over, I’m introducing you to a new and improved version of me to reign in my stead. His name is LaMarcus Aldridge.

    See, LaMarcus can do everything I could do when I was young, but just a little bitLaMarcus Aldridge better. I know you guys love my high release point that enables me to get a shot off whenever, against whomever, right? Well, LaMarcus one-upped me. He’s got my high follow-through but he doesn’t just sit on the Three-point line. He actually stays in his range and uses it to his advantage down-low. (I don’t really see the benefit in that since the Three-pointers attract all the ladies, but to each his own.)

    I know your memory isn’t too far gone to forget how nasty my back-to-the-basket game used to be. Yeah, LaMarcus has got that on lock too. Did you guys see his post-up prowess last season?

    And I hate to keep going on about the kid, but if you think some ol’ lumpy 285-pounder is going to stop him, you better guess again. My man can put it on the deck. How many 6-11 guys with the length of a skyscraper you know can take it to the rack and finish either left or right? Look, I’ve been in the League for a minute. I know talent—or a foul—when I see it. The 2009-2010 season is going to be the year fans take notice that there’s more than just one star in Portland.

    Thanks ‘Sheed. Appreciate you taking the time to give further credence to us projecting Aldridge as one of the Top 50 next season. You made some good points and to be honest, L.A. does remind me of a younger you. A little less angry version of you, but you nonetheless.

    Simply put, Aldridge has the tools to be one of the top three power forwards in the next 4-5 years. He’s got range. He can rebound. His post-up game is nice. He can get a shot at-will. The only areas for improvement—defense—are likely to improve as his body matures and he puts some extra pounds on his skinny frame. And even with that said he still averaged just under a block a game and he snatched 7.5 boards a night last year.

    Focusing on next season, there shouldn’t be much stopping Aldridge from clocking some votes when the All-Star Game rolls around. With the addition of Andre Miller, he should find even more open looks and should push that 18ppg average from last year to at least 20ppg. Maybe that’s a bit hopeful, but it’s hard to ignore how unstoppable he looked at times last season. He just plain took a few games over last year. And not many players, even the best of them, can do that. In a Conference completely stacked with star power forwards (Tim, Dirk, Amar’e, Pau, D.West etc.) Aldridge held his own last year.

    I’m not going to kill you with stats. Great players transcend numbers. If you didn’t know Lebron’s stats, you would still think he’s a great player just by watching him play. LaMarcus Aldridge just looks like he’s getting it in. And he is.

    The only thing stopping Aldridge is if he follows in ‘Sheed’s footsteps and begins to rely on taking 20-foot plus jumpshots. We’ve all seen how ugly it can get when a low-post player starts making a few deep ones and then gets the notion he’s the next Tim Legler (Charles Barkley, anyone?). Though his mid-range game is excellent for a big man, he’s too quick and long to forgo closer shots in the trenches.

    As well, Aldridge works perfectly with fellow star Brandon Roy. He’s a perfect compliment in the pick-and-roll game. He can hit it from 18ft, and he’s got enough handles to take it to the rack. As they continue to learn to play with one another, we could be looking at another legendary combo. And as Roy continues to blossom (some would argue he’s already in full bloom) expect Aldridge to follow suit. Stardom is on its way.

    Notes
    • Rankings are based solely on projected ‘09-10 performance.
    • Contributors to this list include: Jake Appleman, Brett Ballantini, Russ Bengtson, Toney Blare, Shannon Booher, Myles Brown, Franklyn Calle, Gregory Dole, Emry DowningHall, Jonathan Evans, Adam Fleischer, Jeff Fox, Sherman Johnson, Aaron Kaplowitz, John Krolik, Holly MacKenzie, Ryne Nelson, Chris O’Leary, Ben Osborne, Alan Paul, Susan Price, Sam Rubenstein, Khalid Salaam, Kye Stephenson, Adam Sweeney, Vincent Thomas, Tzvi Twersky, Justin Walsh, Joey Whelan, Eric Woodyard, and Nima Zarrabi.
    • Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

    • Add a Comment
      • Digg
      • del.icio.us
      • Facebook
      • Google
      • StumbleUpon
      • TwitThis
      • Yahoo! Buzz
      • Print this article!
    • RSS

    Tags: , , ,

    • Michael Posted: Sep.10 at 8:05 am
      totally agree..good placement for him, i am a big fan of his game, just needs to crash the boards a little more

    • Yesse Posted: Sep.10 at 8:13 am
      Aldridge over Smith?What kind of list is this?Rudy and Josh are both better than him.Rudy is probably an all star with Josh.

    • Overtime Posted: Sep.10 at 8:14 am
      I can sense there may be a few angry comments about this one, but i think it’s great, i would’nt mind seeing him a few places higher.
      He is underated as hell, don’t expect that to stay for too long

    • a_whiteman Posted: Sep.10 at 8:32 am
      excellent spot for L.A the rugged man. His game is on the rise and he should be an all star in the near future. I cant wait to see Roy and him lead this team to contention.

    • tavoris Posted: Sep.10 at 9:06 am
      love his game…in a couple years he’ll be in the 20s

    • Bart Posted: Sep.10 at 9:08 am
      LA is the man, I’m a huge Josh fan but even i can’t argue that. Dude is unstoppable when he’s on

    • Bryan Posted: Sep.10 at 9:24 am
      I’m betting the bulls wish they had kept him.

    • Hursty Posted: Sep.10 at 9:26 am
      First I was like “wow, really?”, then it was like “yeh, I guess this might work, but look at the dudes already listed”, then it became “actually, this is a pretty good pick. I can live with this”.
      BTW, that ‘Sheed meta-narrative type prelude thing should be in italics. Smoother reading. Other than that, no issue with this pick.
      BUT, it needs to be said - Aldridge is SOFT (sometimes), and if you disagree, watch him playing against Chuck Hayes this year.

    • riggs Posted: Sep.10 at 9:29 am
      UNDERRATED

    • AB_40 Posted: Sep.10 at 9:43 am
      needs a new nickname LA is lame. maybe something for in the new issue of slam?

    • Sparker Posted: Sep.10 at 10:19 am
      more like chris bosh without the talent agent

    • Klav Posted: Sep.10 at 10:23 am
      co-sign Hursty. he is SOFT, that’s why i don’t like dudes game. i hate his game, settles for too many jumpers; he’ll do the most damage there, but the Blazers need a true post presence to help legitimize their offense.

    • Gerard Himself Posted: Sep.10 at 10:34 am
      Am I the only one who has trouble getting on SLAMonline.com today? When I just type in the url, the homepage stays blank. I had to actually get here via google….. just wondering! (sorry, off-topic, I know) I always use google chrome and I never have any problems. But for some reason the site doesn’t load for me today, neither does it via IE.

    • tavoris Posted: Sep.10 at 10:36 am
      Klav, that’s where the health of Old Man Oden’s knees comes into play.

    • LeoneL Posted: Sep.10 at 10:37 am
      Portland has its own version of West-Paul (in a sense) in Aldridge and Roy.. Kye Stephenson, I agree.

    • Eboy Posted: Sep.10 at 10:41 am
      Yeah, he’s about 15 spots too high.

    • Gerard Himself Posted: Sep.10 at 10:42 am
      forget my comment…. it all works fine now. Sorry.

    • Z Posted: Sep.10 at 11:17 am
      Love his game. I doubted him coming out of college because he used to get bullied down low by cats half his size but he’s been improving every year. Very solid complimentary guy.

    • JME Posted: Sep.10 at 11:18 am
      he’s as soft as Pau but since he’s black, we dont realize this

    • Klav Posted: Sep.10 at 11:19 am
      Tavoris, benjamin button disease FTW. i think this is also the part where Ghostface becomes the next dominant big man to forge another version of “Twin Towers,” okay i’m jk. Aldridge needs an awkward bald/white spot on his head, more facial hair, and a 3-ball. then he can REALLY be Sheed part 2 minus the ferocity.

    • josh Posted: Sep.10 at 11:25 am
      Aldridge is all star material. his rebounds are a little low but he does play with greg oden and joel pryzbilla.. he has great range and that really spreads the floor. lma and roys two man game is second to only parker and duncan.

    • Brad Long Posted: Sep.10 at 11:45 am
      @JME:Tell me about it, no team with some lilly white ass charmin soft power forward like Pau will ever win a…oh yeah, nevermind.

    • JME Posted: Sep.10 at 12:02 pm
      i never said Pau sucked

    • [...] a creative look at SLAMOnline.com naming LaMarcus Aldridge the No. 39 best player in the L, slotting him above such guys as Josh [...]

    • cb 34 Posted: Sep.10 at 12:10 pm
      I think this spot is low. He could have ended up at no. 30 and i wouldn’t have a problem with it. Excellent post game with range. He’s gonna have a big year. Portland is making a serious run at the title.

    • James Posted: Sep.10 at 12:20 pm
      It’s a funny (and false) notion about LMA being “soft”…I watched this dude a lot last year — he does what is needed, within the context of the offense. If what is needed is to take it to the hole and dunk on someone’s head, he can do that. If what is needed is to “settle” for a mid-range jumper, he can do that too (and make it with uncanny accuracy). Interesting how this skill makes him “soft”. From where I sit, it makes him a winner…

    • niQ Posted: Sep.10 at 12:22 pm
      AB_40 he already was in those name game things. He was named L.A. the Rugged Man… as stated by an earlier post… This is completely irrelevant but, I really want to know where Kevin Durant ranks.

    • Kulchakris Posted: Sep.10 at 12:26 pm
      I know this story is not about Pau, but since JME and Brad Long brought him up….Pau is much better than people think. As soft as he is, he pretty much outplayed his opposite number in every series during the Lakers’ championship run. I doubt anyone would call some of the guys he outplayed “soft”.

    • onlyclipfanonslam Posted: Sep.10 at 12:33 pm
      Interesting… I think Rudy should be higher than LA though. Don’t like the writeup too much, maybe because I don’t see the comparison to Sheed.

    • James the balla Posted: Sep.10 at 12:36 pm
      I watch alot of basketball but still don;t know alot about this guy. I know he can play. But I don’t know if I would have put him above Smith. Anyways … possibly two more blazers? Broy with maybe Bayless? Or Oden? or Frye? or Miller? Or are they all strecthes?

    • broyizabeast Posted: Sep.10 at 12:54 pm
      this is a good spot for LA. next season he will be ranked higher. with LA a year more mature as well as roy feeling the best he has felt entering an nba season, the blazers are the main challengers to the lakers. hate if u want. san antonio is getting to old to compete a full 82 games let alone into the playoffs. phx same situation. The portland dynasty begins shortly. haters start hating…. GO BLAZERS!!

    • paniscus Posted: Sep.10 at 12:54 pm
      Nice review of LMA. You also could’ve mentioned that the man can RUN in the open court. I’m hard pressed to think of another 4 that can get down the court like Aldridge. McMillan kept the brakes on the team for the last few years b/c they didn’t have a pg that could reliably run a break, but I’d be that you’ll be seeing a lot more of Aldridge in the open court with Miller running the show. 39 this year. Expect an even better spot next year.

    • James the balla Posted: Sep.10 at 1:08 pm
      @broyisabeast … Blazers are the main team to compete against the Lakers? AND the Spurs are to old? GTFOH. Blazers are underrated but … GTFOH.

    • Overtime Posted: Sep.10 at 1:10 pm
      If Oden can live to the potential that everyone predicted, they could really compliment eachother

    • dma Posted: Sep.10 at 1:32 pm
      i’m surprised there’s been this much love for Lama. Slam usually is full of haters galore. Resign him already Pritchard no more dinking around!

    • UnRel Posted: Sep.10 at 1:33 pm
      if his handles are as good as you say they are.. then why does he always lose the ball with the pick and pop.. shot fake and drive?.. he gets ripped all the time.. in 2k9, that is..

    • UnRel Posted: Sep.10 at 1:34 pm
      seriously, though.. this kid has game.. i wouldn’t call him soft.. but he does need to work on his strength..

    • broyizabeast Posted: Sep.10 at 1:37 pm
      duncan is 33 years old and with just about all 7 footers declining after they hit 30 duncan maybe has 1 good season left. dont get me wrong duncan is and was an amazing player, HOF for sure but who will take over the PF spot when he is unable to compete at such a high level. dejuan blair i dont think so he is giving 5 inches to duncan. and he has suspect knees himself. the spurs have had an amazing last 10 years but its slipping away and fast.

    • Klav Posted: Sep.10 at 1:59 pm
      Saying that he does whatever is needed him within the context of the offense makes sense, and yet it doesn’t make sense. Last season who was going to man the post? Pryzbilla? With a very limited post resume? How about Oden? He isn’t polished at all offensively and can’t even stay on the floor long enough to matter on offense. Channing Frye? Garbage minutes, anybody? The only real big who COULD post was Aldridge, and yet he settled for midrange jumpers. The Blazers commentator himself said that Aldridge probably gets 60% of his points from jumpers (plenty from 18 ft out), when we all know he is long, athletic, and capable of doing damage in the post…all of this leads me to believe he is SOFT.

    • dma Posted: Sep.10 at 2:03 pm
      Nate McMillain has his offense set around Brandon Roy, mid-range jumpers, and 3 pointers for Steve Blake. When they force-fed Lama in the post, he was successful. Nate’s offense is just so damn predictable.

    • JL Posted: Sep.10 at 2:03 pm
      people are called soft cuz they have more a finesse game on offense. LA doesn’t help his case by also being soft on the boards and not a flashy shot blocker. Pau last year really heard the criticisms and bulked up and during the playoffs especially bodied up to some serious big man (finals he often held his ground to dhow). I wouldn’t call Pau soft anymore. LA is not really soft, just a bit low on rebounds and menacing expressions, he just doesn’t have that crazy rodman drive to chase down balls cuz he also plays offense. Or he could get some tattoos all over his body and start screaming alot, maybe that’ll cure his public perception.

    • broyizabeast Posted: Sep.10 at 2:05 pm
      i live in portland and watched all 82 games the blazers played and by no means is LA soft. he shoots alot of jumpers because he is money from 18 ft he can also take it down low if he is needed to. but most of the time the lane is kept open for roy and his ability to take NE1 to the rim, and if the lane gets clogged roy dishes to LA for a quick 2. if u dont believe me go to youtube and watch some lamarcus aldridge highlights…

    • Klav Posted: Sep.10 at 2:12 pm
      Well as long as broyizabeast is speaking, I guess I’m wrong. I live in Portland too and watch plenty of Portland games, what is wrong with Portland’s offense? It’s not balanced. And with that said, when the jumpers ain’t fallin’, they’re looking for a miracle from Roy (which he can deliver) but it’s not happening every night in and out. That’s why I emphasize LaMarcus using his post game, which he hasn’t utilized nearly enough for the benefit of the team. McMillan won’t win a championship in Portland, and the Blazers won’t win a championship wit him at the helm. The team is mad talented and on the come up, but the coaching will keep them from the promised land.

    • James the balla Posted: Sep.10 at 2:18 pm
      Thanks Klav for clearing that up for me. And even thougn Duncan is 33. He is still a beast, and will stay relevant for a bit longer do to his fundamentals. The Spurs are going to be very strong this year if health allows them to.

    • la huey Posted: Sep.10 at 2:21 pm
      only two blazers in the top 50 but memphis is going to have four? unless slam thinks rudy or dre miller is better than david aldridge…

    • broyizabeast Posted: Sep.10 at 2:24 pm
      that was all last season this season will be a different story if u kept up on all the reports you would know that they are tuning the offense around balance. they have a new veteran to help them in those slumps. and mcmillans offense was the best last season after the all star break even with the lakers and the cavs portland had the best eff. rating.

    • BossTerry Posted: Sep.10 at 2:25 pm
      He needs a new contract in Portland, Roy got his now they need to make sure LA isnt going anywhere..

    • broyizabeast Posted: Sep.10 at 2:35 pm
      fundamentals can only keep him in the league so long. the spurs are only gonna be contenders for as long as duncan stays healthy. when he is gone san an. will be lucky to stay in the top 8. and ginobli is only a year younger then duncan. time is on the blazers side.

    • Klav Posted: Sep.10 at 2:35 pm
      broyizabeast: They have yet to implement a reliable post game. With only one option in the post, that doesn’t show much balance. You got: Roy literally doing everything, Outlaw being reckless, Martell/Blake/Rudy shooting 3’s (Rudy isn’t even used to his greatest ability: versatility), Miller/Aldridge shooting midrange, Batum for more 3’s and defense, Bayless to ride the pine, Pryzbilla for defense & boards, and Oden to have a mediocre night every 3 nights and 6 fouls to give. With only LaMarcus as the only “legitimate post”, Roy as the superstar, a crapload of jumpers and some fast breaks and that’s the offense. Slashers anyone? Nope. Post game? One guy doesn’t count as a “post game” and too many players who shoot 3’s. I know for a fact that 3’s kept Portland in games all too much. Like I said, if the jumpers aren’t falling, what are they gonna do, go Cleveland and go ISO? And just a testament to the coaching deficiencies: playoffs vs. Houston - giving Outlaw the final shot (who was off all game) instead of Fernandez (who had the hot hand). PROOF.

    • tavoris Posted: Sep.10 at 3:24 pm
      you are correct…Alridge would be a more dangerous scorer in the post. However, with Pryzbilla’s and Oden’s limited range, he’d be getting double teamed with the quickness down there. Aldridge working from the mid-post makes Pryzbilla, Oden, and Roy more effective.

    • broyizabeast Posted: Sep.10 at 3:25 pm
      the season hasnt started so how can u say what they have and havent implemented into there game plans. last year was just that last year this is a new season a fresh start. millers play style is different then blakes so the game plan will be different then last season. And giving outlaw the final shot made sense he has won so many games for the blazers in the final seconds. is rudy known as mr fourth quarter in portland no outlaw is. you could go to all the teams last year and find a moment where the hot hand didnt get the ball in the final seconds so your argument is pointless.

    • James the balla Posted: Sep.10 at 3:27 pm
      What the heck is broyisabeast saying? I am having trouble reading. Balla out.

    • broyizabeast Posted: Sep.10 at 3:29 pm
      so balls deep cant read?

    • blazersfan Posted: Sep.10 at 3:30 pm
      i fully agree with u broyizabeast

    • Klav Posted: Sep.10 at 3:43 pm
      Nope, your arguments just aren’t backed up by solid evidence. Its an opinion without substance to fall back on. Outlaw isn’t known as Mr. Fourth Quarter in Portland, Roy is. Plus Outlaw is streakier than Fernandez. Travis is the prime example of “fan favorite”, his “player value” doesn’t necessarily merit his popularity. He’s still out of control, there’s a reason he doesn’t start. Ill-advised shots with the clock winding down ring a bell? Tavoris is right, midrange does make sense, but it still proves that McMillan and crew have no answer for low post offense. Now lets shift gears, imagine this for a second though, would the triangle work in Rip City? You have Roy as the elite wing, and Aldridge will only get better from the post, matchup problems, along with all the shooters…doesn’t it make sense?

    • Klav Posted: Sep.10 at 3:51 pm
      “and mcmillans offense was the best last season after the all star break even with the lakers and the cavs portland had the best eff. rating. ”
      And I guess this “most efficient offense” got them past the Rockets WITH homecourt advantage, right? Especially when nobody could score and everybody came out with nothing to prove except Roy who had to pour in 30+ in almost every game just to keep them in it.

    • kobesbestfriend Posted: Sep.10 at 4:39 pm
      wtf???LA isnt even the 39th best player in the west let alone in the league!!!SLAM is retarded!!!!!

    • UnRel Posted: Sep.10 at 4:43 pm
      Klav.. as i was reading everyone’s comments about LA’s mid range game.. i kept going back to horace grant in the tri.. or putting LA with shaq.. then i read your comment.. now.. i don’t know how the tri would work with the blazers.. but LA’s game is built for the tri.. big man with range..

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Sep.10 at 5:15 pm
      Too low. He’s going to break out next year yet he’s only 39. Wow.

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Sep.10 at 5:16 pm
      Aldridge isn’t soft. He’s actually pretty physical. He does have a wet jumpshot though.

    • Stephen Posted: Sep.10 at 5:26 pm
      No way is aldridge better than a prime sheed.

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Sep.10 at 5:33 pm
      And he’s a good post-up player.

    • chiqo Posted: Sep.10 at 5:36 pm
      aldridge isn’t mean enough. until he gets that mean streak, he’ll just be average. 20 and 10 if he ever gets it together, cause his rebounding leaves much to be desired.

    • dma Posted: Sep.10 at 5:48 pm
      Everybody thinks Lama is soft because of his rebounding numbers and his great mid-range game. Pryz is arguably the most underrated center in the league. He averages almost 9 rebounds a game playing 24 minutes. Oden grabs 7 and plays only 20 minutes a game. Roy grabs another 5. Plus Nate has Lama running the floor after a missed opponent’s shot. Most teams leave their two bigs to get rebounds. But Oden and Pryz are both very capable of crashing the boards. Play Lama at center with a small lineup and he turns into a beast.

    • BossTerry Posted: Sep.10 at 5:54 pm
      LA is just getting better and better.. Blazers in 2011… Was at the Rose Garden last night for the Blink 182 concert and there was about 1/4 the people there then the average Blazer game..

    • BossTerry Posted: Sep.10 at 6:35 pm
      @dma- Great points, those nicknames however…… On Portland local news Joel has been referred as “the vanilla gorilla”..

    • Rusty Posted: Sep.10 at 6:44 pm
      Blazers fans are stupid

    • BossTerry Posted: Sep.10 at 6:52 pm
      people named rusty,dusty,and crusty are stupid.

    • Joey E. Posted: Sep.10 at 6:53 pm
      I just dont think he should be above KMart or Josh Smith

    • landyn15 Posted: Sep.10 at 10:08 pm
      I don’t understand how aldridge is ranked better than kevin martin, Aldridge is good but I don’t think he is worthy of being ranked 39, wth

    • Don Wayne Posted: Sep.10 at 10:29 pm
      Aldridge is clearly better than Martin and Josh Smith. And their potential isn’t even close. I think this article got it just about right. In 2-3 years, he will be one of the 2 best PFs in the NBA.

    • Shu Posted: Sep.10 at 10:38 pm
      Ya know, LMA might become the next Shawn Marion. Great player on a better team but the third wheel behind 2 superstars, and constantly under appreciated. Might make a few all stars but not so much on the endorsement dollars. Will demand a trade, will be traded to a lottery team for an expiring, then figure out he can’t do it on his own, then meddle in mediocrity well into his 30’s.

    • dyce Posted: Sep.10 at 11:21 pm
      James Dolan must be evaluating the talent for this top 50….Its terrible so far….I’m just waiting for Danilo Gallinari or the big greek dude that Vince dunked on to show up.

    • Dacre Posted: Sep.10 at 11:40 pm
      OKAY CLICK ON MY NAME: self alley, over a dude, THROUGH THE LEGS windmill!
      watch it now.

    • DP Posted: Sep.11 at 12:18 am
      I love this article. I just hate that you put David West as an elite power foward in this L. He better not be higher than 35 on this list. play wit it.

    • Anton Posted: Sep.11 at 1:30 am
      “3 pointers attract all the ladies” LOL
      And Krav’s right.

    • Solon Posted: Sep.11 at 1:39 am
      I thought this was one of the worst articles yet-only thing worse was that crap Rudy Gay/David Stern talking to god type of thing. That was really bad.
      This spot seems too high for Mr. Aldridge. I would rather have Gay, Howard, Diddy, or Artest on my team. But i guess since this is predictions for next year, maybe he will get better. He needs to start dominating games to be Top-40 in the NBA.
      Also, Top 3 PF in the League?!?!?!PSSSSSHHHHH. Trippin.

    • Enigmatic Posted: Sep.11 at 1:58 am
      Yeah, I think there are quite a few players already listed how should be higher than Aldridge. But I do get upset when I think of the Bulls trading him away for Tyrus Thomas. How long we been complaining about not having a scoring PF? And I know dude ain’t exactly a beast in the low post but he is and imo will continue to be much, much better than Thomas. Damn you, Paxson!

    • SLAM'sFAN Posted: Sep.11 at 4:18 am
      @Yesse:
      SLAM got it! Rudy & Smith cannot be ranked higher than Aldridge for their one dimensional skill (Maybe just Smith…). While Gay and Smith consistently produces highlight plays - Aldridge is just consistent(ish). Might just be one man’s opinion, but when I look at Aldridge’s game - I see a few players assembled in this fella: I see Tim Duncan, I see…well Sheed (I can live with that), David West, and even a tad bit of KG in this young man. Aldridge will get better and eventually be an all-star. I was quite surprised too about the 39th spot, I actually thought that he was gonna be in between 45-50,lol, but when I think more carefully - I can’t agree more with SLAM.

    • Furious Posted: Sep.11 at 4:23 am
      The article’s reference to David West gave me the scariest thought i’ve had all day. David West better not be on this list. He is the most overrated player in the L, by a ridiculous amount.

    • Oggbog Posted: Sep.11 at 6:19 am
      Klav…. yes, Outlaw was known as mr. 4th quarter, beyond this, i hear your points. Joey E. ….I see your point with Kevin Martin, Martin is an amazing player, but i think LaMarcus is higher because of potential and position (the dude is huge). With Josh Smith though, I feel that LmA is already a better PF, a lot of the talk here has been about Aldridge’s reliance on his jumper, but he hits it… a lot. As last season progressed (and the season before) he became more dominant inside, but regardless that tall man can shoot (hence the sheed refrence.) Josh Smith should dunk on everyone, but for some reason he shoots an ugly jump shot even though most defenders prefer that.

    • Hisham Posted: Sep.11 at 7:05 am
      compliment - complement is becoming the new then - than

    • josh Posted: Sep.11 at 3:12 pm
      the reason josh smith is not as good as aldridge is because he cant score as many ways as aldridge. aldridge can play in the low post he can shoot the 18 footer, and can even hit the ocasional 3. to those who are bitchin about mcmillan, he has turned this team from a lottery team to a title contender. blazers lost in the first round… wow the second youngest team in the league had a hard time in the playoffs? 3/4 of the team had never been to the post season. and the rockets without yao gave k*be and the L@kers a run for there money. expect portland to be top 3 in the west this season.. and im guessing #2. and expect roy to be on a mission. Disclaimer: im a biased blazer fan.

    • a6m5 Posted: Sep.12 at 2:12 am
      Klav: I think the Blazers offense is fine, defense on the other hand….. And I don’t know how fair it is to bring up that Playoff series against the Rockets. I realize that NBA officiating is nearly a joke at times, but even to me, I could not believe how games can be called so one sided. Roy was getting to the rim at will, but they just let the Rockets, especially Yao, beat the heck out of him mid-air. Had Przy & Oden received that kind of love from the refs, it would have easily taken away Rockets inside scoring, forcing them to shoot crappy outside shots like the Blazers did in the series. Seriously, since when are centers allowed to fly at the shooters, body them, don’t even get the piece of the ball, and get away with it? Over & over, game after game. lol On LaMarcus being labeled soft(finally on-topic!), although I don’t completely agree with that, I expect it. L-Train definitely is a finesse player, and he doesn’t consistently show that intensity, or fire in his game. To be honest, I’m not sure if that’s a good thing, or bad thing. Bottom line, I like his game. His game can improve, but he is always displaying improvement, so I don’t see a problem. :)

    • Jacob J Posted: Sep.12 at 12:09 pm
      I dont get all the bashing at sheed. He was a great player for us in Detroit and the pistons didnt become really good conteders until Sheed came to town.Some of your favorite teams starters cant even compete with Sheed.

    • al Posted: Sep.14 at 4:22 am
      If only he could read a defense…

    • kevin Posted: Dec.6 at 10:55 pm
      they put aldridge at 39 and micheal redd at 42?!
      lol

    Comments




    The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.