Monday, October 5th, 2009 at 8:00 am  |  240 responses

Top 50: Derrick Rose, no. 18

The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players.

by Franklyn Calle

The time has come! The guy you all love to hate has finally appeared on the rankings. If you’ve been following our Top 50 list as of late, then you already know that DRose has been meDerrick Rosentioned in the comments section more than the featured player. And for the most part, the comments haven’t been too positive.

Many of you feel Rose is too high. Maybe he is, maybe not.

There is no point for me to sit here and try to convince those who aren’t happy with where is ranked or even those who don’t like his game. An article will not all of the sudden change your perspective on him. Instead I will evaluate his rookie season, what can be expected from him next season, and what could have led to him landing at No. 18.

***

We all witnessed history on April 18, when DRose had a historic playoff performance against the defending champions – the Boston Celtics – finishing with 36 points, 11 assists and 4 rebounds, while shooting 63 percent from the floor. His 36 points tied Kareem Abdul-Jabbar for most points ever scored by a rookie in his playoff debut. I should note that Abdul-Jabbar was 22 years old at the time and Rose was only 20. And…. 10 inches of height makes a difference. Rose also became only the second player in NBA history to finish with more than 35 points and 10 assists in his playoff debut (regardless of years in the League).

So let’s see, how did the Chicago native’s first year numbers rank with those of Chris Paul, Allen Iverson, Deron Williams, Jason Kidd, Chauncey Billups, Rajon Rondo, Steve Nash, Tony Parker and Devin Harris? If we were to compare Rose’s rookie season to those of the League’s premiere point guards, it is evident that he is on his way to be a very special one.

Compared to the point guards who were just mentioned, Rose’s regular season rookie stats showed he may very well be the real deal. Only Iverson averaged more points than Rose as a rookie. What about field goals? His 47.5 percent from the floor was higher than any of the aforementioned guards. Only Paul, Iverson and Kidd averaged more assists then Rose as a rookie, and that difference was by less than 1.5 assists.

Rose is the only one who led his team to the Playoffs as a rookie. I emphasize ‘LED‘ because although Nash, Parker and Harris made the Playoffs as rookies, all three teams had other guys they depended on to lead the way. We all can agree that Rose was a huge factor in the Bulls making the Playoffs after Chicago’s absence the previous year. He shot 80 percent from the free throw line in the Playoffs, better than any of the other guards when they played in the Playoffs for the first time – and keep in mind most of them dudes didn’t even make the Playoffs until their third year in the League.

With Ben Gordon leaving to the Pistons, you can expect for Rose’s stats to increase by a good amount. A 22-point, 8-assist, and 6-rebound season is very well possible.

Now I’ve noticed some people argued that Rose only shot 22 percent from behind the arc. Well, he proved in his playoff debut that he can easily drop 36 points without ever having to hit a single three-pointer. It won’t be too long before the same applies for 40-point performances. And let’s be real, his three-point percentage will improve with experience and years.

Another argument against Rose seems to be his defense. My question is how many 20-year-olds do you guys remember coming into the League and straight up locking down guys? Name the point guards! You won’t find many… if any! In fact you have grown-ass men in their 30s in the League who still don’t seem to have learned the fundamentals of defense.

So if we’re going by statistics, then it’s fair to say Rose is well ahead enough to being one of the NBA’s premier guards. If we are going by talent and court presence, even better. I don’t know how many point guards in the League are as athletic, agile and explosive as he is. Again, if any.

Now how did he end up at the 18 slot? Well as you may see at the bottom of the page, “rankings are based solely on projected ’09-10 performances.” This hints that it has nothing to do with what a player has done in his career, and more so with what it is expected of him this season. It is obvious by where he is ranked that expectations are higher for Rose than, say, Billups and all the other guards who have already appeared in the Top 50 list.

Coincidentally enough, Rose celebrated his 21st birthday yesterday.

Say what you like, but if last year was any indication, Rose is on his way to either being your favorite point guard, or your favorite point guard to hate. But either way, he’ll have you talking for years to come.

Notes
• Rankings are based solely on projected ’09-10 performance.
• Contributors to this list include: Jake Appleman, Brett Ballantini, Russ Bengtson, Toney Blare, Shannon Booher, Myles Brown, Franklyn Calle, Gregory Dole, Emry DowningHall, Jonathan Evans, Adam Fleischer, Jeff Fox, Sherman Johnson, Aaron Kaplowitz, John Krolik, Holly MacKenzie, Ryne Nelson, Chris O’Leary, Ben Osborne, Alan Paul, Susan Price, Sam Rubenstein, Khalid Salaam, Kye Stephenson, Adam Sweeney, Vincent Thomas, Tzvi Twersky, Justin Walsh, Joey Whelan, Eric Woodyard, and Nima Zarrabi.
• Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , ,

  • J.B Posted: Oct.5 at 8:07 am
    too high?

  • C-Mac Posted: Oct.5 at 8:12 am
    i like him here. no matter what people say, this kid is something special

  • Prentice Posted: Oct.5 at 8:13 am
    200 comments? If i understand the criteria correctly, then this is a good place for Rose.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 8:16 am
    Well. Haters be damned.

  • jude Posted: Oct.5 at 8:22 am
    5th, but no freaking way DRose > Billups or Nash

  • jude Posted: Oct.5 at 8:24 am
    btw we’re comparing the current DRose with the current PGs (such as those u mentioned) in the league… why bring up AI’s, Kidd’s, Rondo’s, Nash’s rookie seasons? irrelevant excuses for placing DRose so high

  • phil Posted: Oct.5 at 8:24 am
    if it’s projected for the 09-10 season, then why is gil so low?

  • T Money Posted: Oct.5 at 8:25 am
    I think I speak for most commenters here when I say we don’t hate Derrick Rose. Its just that he hasn’t done enough yet to be the 18th best player in the NBA. 16 and 6, barely making the playoffs and then a first round exit against a team which had 80% of its starting lineup injured? That in my book is not enough to put him above at least 10 other players on this list. And the Bulls, as presently constructed might not even make the playoffs this year.

  • T Money Posted: Oct.5 at 8:25 am
    Let the games begin…

  • neaorin Posted: Oct.5 at 8:30 am
    True, it’s 09-10 projections ONLY. So why are we trying to justify relatively poor D and 3pt shooting (for his ranking) by saying they will improve “with experience and years”? Either they improve dramatically _this_ season, or 18 is too high. I’m guessing the SLAM crew are banking on the former.

  • real23 Posted: Oct.5 at 8:34 am
    I completely agree with Rose ranking 18th, it’s not too high. He has something that makes me wanna watch Bulls games.

  • T Money Posted: Oct.5 at 8:35 am
    As I trolled before, this seems like a ploy to sell more of the latest issue of Kicks. If that’s the case, SLAM, that’s not a good look.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 8:36 am
    If he puts up 22 8 and 6 I don’t care if he shoots 0 percent from three.

  • riggs Posted: Oct.5 at 8:37 am
    he is definitely not higher than chauncey, DEFINITELY.

  • DP Posted: Oct.5 at 8:50 am
    can’t wait to see this ranking come to the light. play wit it.

  • DP Posted: Oct.5 at 8:51 am
    One thing I do know is that Andre Miller will probably tell you he is the best PG in the L. well at least his ankles will. play wit it.

  • T Money Posted: Oct.5 at 8:51 am
    @riggs: That goes without saying. Chauncey was in high school when Rose was born. And Rose is possibly the most athletic PG I have seen.

  • James the Balla Posted: Oct.5 at 8:57 am
    This kid should have a phenominal season!! If he plays 40 minutes a game … this spot is good.

  • Simon S.Y Lawy Posted: Oct.5 at 8:58 am
    We’ll see if he’s that good …

  • Clockwork Posted: Oct.5 at 9:00 am
    Shoulda waited one more year before ranking him this high. He’s more of a mid twenties guy at the moment…

  • Esco Posted: Oct.5 at 9:09 am
    My gosh…They never said that he was the 18th best player in the league. These rankings are about how much they are expected to improve and perform next season. It’s safe to say that Rose will perform better than Nash. Nash will give his same numbers as last season, but Rose’s can only go up. This ranking is great. I can’t see what’s so hard to understand. Again, this is about which player is better than which, it’s about who they think will have a better season. It’s not hard to see that Rose will have a better season than the guys mentioned before him.

  • LeoneL Posted: Oct.5 at 9:10 am
    Who helped Rose get this spot? Ben Gordon. With him gone, there is no doubt that DRose is the alpha male in Chicago. That means he’ll really be a beast this year thus justifying this ranking.

  • LeoneL Posted: Oct.5 at 9:12 am
    Right on Esco. Slam, where’s my comment? T_T

  • Nupe Posted: Oct.5 at 9:15 am
    If I understand the criteria right, you’re saying that since D. Rose had a better rookie season than AI, Chauncy, Nash, Rondo etc, then his projected 2nd year will be better than their second years were? If that’s the case I can see how #18 could be a reasonable projection. I think it’s just hard to pick a player with only one year in the league so high (unless you are talking bout LeBron or Magic). I don’t agree with this pick but I can see the logic in it, so we’ll wait and see.

  • T Money Posted: Oct.5 at 9:17 am
    @ Esco: Of course this is about the 50 best players. Most people above Rose will put up very similar numbers to last season. This is not about improvement, or the top half would be full of scrubs.

  • T Money Posted: Oct.5 at 9:21 am
    And I don’t see any basis for projecting a leap from 16 6 4 to 22 8 6. The Bulls lost their best scorer, and the East got considerably better.

  • Sparker Posted: Oct.5 at 9:23 am
    this is laughable

  • Furious Posted: Oct.5 at 9:24 am
    This is absolutely ridiculous. There is no way this guy is #18 in the league. He had one good series, in which he wasnt even the most important person on his team. Everyone says his points will go up with Gordon gone, but it means that defenses will be focussing purely on him. He’ll get the best guard defender, and will struggle.

  • Hussman25 Posted: Oct.5 at 9:26 am
    “I think I speak for most commenters here when I say we don’t hate Derrick Rose. Its just that he hasn’t done enough yet to be the 18th best player in the NBA.”
    T-Money my thoughts EXACTLY!
    The top 20 should be dedicated for all-star players ONLY; he is on the “cusp,” but not quite there yet! No hate at all… Love D-Rose’s game…. but too much hype too soon may spell DISASTER!

  • rog123 Posted: Oct.5 at 9:52 am
    This article made me fine with his placement. Very convincing. I already knew he was a special player but wow!

  • Gerard Himself Posted: Oct.5 at 9:58 am
    Esco is one of the few people who gets it. A lot of people still don’t get how the rankings work, even if we had over 30 by now.

  • Overtime Posted: Oct.5 at 9:59 am
    Love his game. Loved his playoff debut, but there is no way that Rose is 18th best in the league next season. And 22,8 and 6? I’d be very surprised.
    Too many holes just yet. Plus, though his debut was sweet, there were a lot of negatives in that series too

  • ManueII Posted: Oct.5 at 10:03 am
    see, I’m not arguing, he won’t ever be a great. But I have a problem with how high he is because, he’s above all star players, Devin Harris, Danny Granger being prime examples. Secondly, although he took them to the playoffs, he did not take over in such a fashion as Chauncey Billups, and completely change the landscape of his team. Again, I’m not saying he is not going to be great, but to have him this high? No.

  • chiqo Posted: Oct.5 at 10:11 am
    hmm… no?

  • T Money Posted: Oct.5 at 10:19 am
    @ Gerard: These lists have always been about the 50 best players. Its not about who will have the most improved season. Unles you think Kobe is gonna average 32 12 12.

  • 6marjons Posted: Oct.5 at 10:25 am
    in five years iverson will no longer be called ‘the best little man to ever play the game’
    i dont agree with him being this high but top 25 at least. kid deserves his props

  • Esco Posted: Oct.5 at 10:27 am
    T Money: Maybe it’s also about players who’ll up their play to benefit their team and/or those who’ll keep being consistent and keep their teams on top. Hence why Nash (sorry for using him as an example everytime) isn’t as high, he’ll be consistent but the Suns aren’t going anywhere. Kobe will always be the top dog on the Lakers, do you really expect him to be under Rose in terms of importance to team success? Rose’s stats will take a bigger leap than Kobe’s, but nonetheless, Kobe’s performance is what determines whether the Lakers repeat or not. Rose’s determines whether the Bulls make it to the second round or not.

  • K-Nasty Posted: Oct.5 at 10:34 am
    Why is it that when a 20 ppg scorer leaves the Bulls everyone automatically expects Rose’s numbers to explode as a result? That’s like 5 assists a game down the toilet. And is Rose really going to score that much more when defenses are solely focused on him now?

  • Laumol Posted: Oct.5 at 10:52 am
    @ T Money: you’re proving my point, thanks. Every top 50 article had ended with: “Rankings are based solely on projected ‘09-10 performance.” So SLAM just expects Rose to have a huge season for Chicago, and that he will have a bigger impact on his team than, for instance, Steve Nash.

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 10:52 am
    It was evident that with his learning curve, he’ll be able to work on a lot of things and improve his game immensely over the years. Watching a few of his games in the beginning of the season and then watching his playoff performance, I mean WOW. Dude is raw. I never followed him until he entered the L, but as soon as I watched him dude had me playin his highlight reels. Dude is sick, if he can’t continually improve, I can possibly see the Bulls advancing to the second round if they can get their whole team on the same page being led by Rose. Just take into consideration, compare his first 5 games to his last 5 of the regular season, and judge him on how much he has improved, gotten worse, or stayed the same. Just try it.

  • Yann Blavec's wife's husband Posted: Oct.5 at 11:03 am
    It’s Allen Iverson, not Allan. And he’s not a point guard.

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 11:13 am
    I like Rose. I don’t have a problem with the ranking.
    But, the idea that everybody was ranked based on their projected individual performance is ludicrous. That didn’t happen. Some folks were ranked like that, others were ranked based on other stuff.

  • tavoris Posted: Oct.5 at 11:16 am
    Good pick for Rose…people can hate on him all they want, but the man is a special player, athletic in a Lebron kindaway, unselfish, relentless, and an incredible will to win. I don’t think the Bulls are gonna miss Gordon AT ALL.

  • Ryne Nelson Posted: Oct.5 at 11:18 am
    Finally, people are talking about the actual top 50 player!

  • Ryne Nelson Posted: Oct.5 at 11:20 am
    And I actually think this is a great spot for Rose. A little ambitious. But the Rose is the only player keeping the Bulls from being a bottom-feeder.

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 11:35 am
    Ryne, you can’t be serious, we all know its Tyrus who is carrying this team on his back. If Thomas didn’t have all those SPECTACULAR finishes, we know the Baby Bulls would be at the bottom of the EC. Okay, just kidding. Can’t wait to use the Bulls on 2K10 tomorrow though.

  • niQ Posted: Oct.5 at 11:37 am
    And here I was thinking Rose would not even make the list. I still think he deserved mid 20s at best. And like the other commenters here stated, unless his stats blow up this year I don’t think he deserved 18.

  • tavoris Posted: Oct.5 at 11:42 am
    niQ, his stats are pretty SURE to rise. Even if it’s a negligible improvement, he still deserved to be here, just from his impact on the team.

  • floe Posted: Oct.5 at 11:43 am
    fvck that.. you guys are a bunch of jokers for putting DR at 18.

  • niQ Posted: Oct.5 at 11:45 am
    Don’t get me wrong though. I don’t hate Rose, I love his game. And I understand it shouldn’t be based solely on stats. But if that’s the case, then you would be saying Rose is better than Durant (on THIS list) based on team potential for the upcoming season. But clearly Durant will be rated better.

  • Justin Walsh Posted: Oct.5 at 11:48 am
    I loveeee how much “OH F THIS LIST” due to D Rose’s placement there is/will be. I’m not the BIGGEST Rose fan, but dude is going to be one of the top 20 NBA players this year. At least, that’s the popular idea. F.C., this was a solid piece! And Klav had just about the best sarcastic comment of the day…until he admitted he was kidding. And I think Rose will get more than just a ‘negligible’ improvement Tavoris *not saying you’re implying he won’t*, because every year I’ve seen him on the court (junior yeah of hs to senior year to freshman of ncaa etc) he has MARKEDLY improved his game in one facet of the game or another. I hope to see his 18 foot jumper get more consistency this year, that way he can make the defense have to work more to corner him into bad shots.

  • black pinoy Posted: Oct.5 at 11:53 am
    before anything else i wanna say im an NBA fan so dont expect any bias from me // id say what rose did last season isnt enough to land him this high.. he should be somewhere near mayo or something // BUT again, this list is for this coming season.. rookies would usually get a should leap in their game on their second year .. and rose is getting this spot simply because the writers (ME too) think hell be this big for chicago this season .. and we all couldnt tell coz the season hasnt even started yet.. and now that gordon is gone rose is gonna have more time with the ball.. im pretty sure he worked on his D and his J this summer.. so please yall need to stop hating on rose .. lets just wait till the season starts.. if think you guys know it all then why dont you try to play for the bulls or try to strt your own top 50.. do yall think chaunceys points per game will go up this season?! he’ll no but im sure rose’s will go up// people.. this isnt about last season.. the writes believe he’s gonna be better than the other players before him this year.. so yall just need to wait and shut it.. rose is the only reason why i watched the chicago game

  • Rel Posted: Oct.5 at 11:59 am
    Rose stats dont compare at all with AI roookie season AI averages 23.5 points 7.5 assist 4 rebounds and 2 steals DRose average 16.8 points 6.3 assist 4 rebounds and not even a steal a game.. In every statical field AI is better.. please get off dis man jock.. he is going to average 19 points and 7 assist next season.. nothing better nothing worst… If anything Devin Harris should of been right here

  • Pve84 Posted: Oct.5 at 12:03 pm
    I agree with AllenP. I love watching Rose play and think he is great, but if this list is meant to rank players based solely on next season expectations, why is O.J. Mayo so low?

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Oct.5 at 12:04 pm
    Co-sign T Money.

  • a_whiteman Posted: Oct.5 at 12:21 pm
    Way to high for rose,25th at best. Kid is gonna be a great player, had a decent playoff but got eaten alive by Rajon “skeletor” rondo. I just don’t see him as too 20 player, yet. Hopefully he justifies this ranking.

  • Shelton Posted: Oct.5 at 12:23 pm
    He will not have a better season than Joe Johnson or Danny Granger and he is definitely not better.

  • UnRel Posted: Oct.5 at 12:26 pm
    looking at just PGs… i can see why he’s this high… just about every other PG in the league has another all/super star on their team.. D.Rose doesn’t.. so based the upcoming season.. D.Rose should have a more productive season.. is it too much hype?.. just as much as CP3 got in his first few years..

  • The D Train Posted: Oct.5 at 12:27 pm
    let’s just check back at the end of the year. i’m guessing that by the time the season closes, Rose will be mentioned in the top 18, and hopefully higher. and that is what this whole list is based on, no?

  • Enigmatic Posted: Oct.5 at 12:28 pm
    I was expecting a lot more hate. I ain’t naming no names, but it seems to me a lot of dudes went from “I ain’t reading SLAM ever again if Rose is in the top 20″ to “Yeah, I’m cool with him at 18.” That’s whatever though. As for me, I’ve also seen Rose improve dramatically from one season to the next since he was in high school, and believe me he will be an all-star caliber player this season, probably the best point guard in the East. Yeah, I said it, better than Devin Harris. Best PG in the L? Nah, CP3′s got that one locked down, but I’m happy with Rose’s placement on this list, and as I told him himself the day I met dude, he’s got a fan for life in me.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 12:34 pm
    The dude just turned 21. He has shown flashes of being something special. BUT I just can’t see him having a better season than Chauncey Billups or Joe Johnson, among others, THIS SEASON. You mean to tell me that in a couple of months we will all recognize that Rose is a better player than these vets? Come on now. Too soon. Maybe in a couple of years, but not now. Therefore, according to the criteria of THIS LIST, he should be ranked lower. But like Allenp pointed out, the criteria for this list seems to be optional. I don’t really think anyone believes that Derrick Rose will be better than Chauncey Billups or Joe Johnson THIS SEASON. Do you? Really?!

  • TADOne Posted: Oct.5 at 12:35 pm
    Hmmmmmmmm. I honestly didn’t see him being ranked THIS high, especially in front of Chauncey and Joe Johnson. I would have placed those two players in front of Rose in my rankings. I expect Rose to play extremely well this season, so I won’t degrade this ranking.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 12:35 pm
    Again, the dude JUST TURNED TWENTY-ONE.

  • DRoseHater? Posted: Oct.5 at 12:38 pm
    He was able to drop 36 in his playoff debut because KEVIN GARNETT was NOT there! If a healthy KG was there, he wouldn’t have done that.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 12:40 pm
    The 18th-best player in the league is a LOCK to be an all-star. Is Rose a lock? I think it would be a major accomplishment if he made the team at all. So 18 is really pushing it.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 12:40 pm
    The 18th-best player in the league is a LOCK to be an all-star. Is Rose a lock? I think it would be a major accomplishment if he made the team at all, even as an injury replacement. So 18 is really pushing it.

  • Spaceship Jay Posted: Oct.5 at 12:40 pm
    I feel like this is an ok spot for him… However, Chauncey literally ate Chris Paul alive in last years playoffs. Would Chauncey (or Chris) not do the same to him on any given night? And more importantly, will either Breeze or Pve84 bounce back to having anything near a successful season against me this year in 2K10? I hope so. I can identify with Mike retiring the first time. Nothing left to do.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 12:44 pm
    Dear Haters, Derrick Rose is a beast. How many players have you heard of being the top pick in the NBA draft after not leading his college basketball team to a 38-2 record? How many guys have you heard of that didn’t come within 2 made free throws of a National Championship? His jersey number says it all. Only 1.

  • northcyde Posted: Oct.5 at 12:45 pm
    I’m not surprised that he’s ranked this high. This ranking is mainly based upon his fabulous playoff performance against Boston. He did have an impressive rookie season no doubt. But he wasn’t the best scorer on the Bulls last year. That title has to go to Ben Gordon. It was his shooting that prevented teams from employing the “Jordan Rules” on Rose. So it will be interesting to see how the loss of Gordon will affect Rose’s effectiveness in 2009 – 10. Expecting Rose to post a 22 – 8 and 6 season, is a little too optimistic in my book. Expect Rose to average 19 ppg – 6.5 assists – 5.5 rebounds – 1.5 stls – 3.1 turn – 46% FG – 28% 3FG – 77% FT. That’s a damn good 2nd season for a PG. It’s not top 20 stats though.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 12:45 pm
    Dear Haters, Derrick Rose is amazing. Admit it. How many players have you heard of being the top pick in the NBA draft after NOT leading his college basketball team to a 38-2 record? How many guys have you heard of getting picked first because they DIDN’T come within 2 made free throws of a National Championship? His jersey number says it all. Only 1.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 12:50 pm
    People pick the most absurd reasons to discount a players spot on this list. “He can’t shoot threes” this list is about production and he produces numbers and victories, without a three point shot. “He can’t play d” yeah way to recycle what you read on sports website x or heard some studio guy say. I’d say not too many people know what it takes to defense the point guard position in the nba , is he getting lit up by anthony johnson or chris paul? Gtfoh.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 12:57 pm
    Dear Bryan Crawford,
    Admit it, Derrick Rose, good as he is, is not better than Chauncey Billups right now. Nor will he have a better season than Billups in 2009/2010. To believe in the previous notion is not tantamount to “hating” Rose. It is merely being realistic in evaluating current NBA productivity. If this were a list for 2010/2011 or 2011/2012, I’d be higher on Rose. It isn’t. This list isn’t about multiple seasons… It’s about… his jersey number says it all: Only 1: 2009/2010. And Rose is too high.

  • Mystery Man Posted: Oct.5 at 1:01 pm
    D Rose is nice… U have to give it to him he had the bulls in the playoffs as a rookie but I don’t think he is top 20. But that’s just my opinion.

  • AJ Posted: Oct.5 at 1:08 pm
    I think this place on the list for Rose is rightfully deserved. One only has to look at his number of FTA’s last year which was about 3. For a guy who gets to the rack all the time that number was totally underwhelming, and I get a sense Rose will get some preferential treatment this year, especially early on with the replace refs who called 75 fouls last night in the Wolves-Bucks game. Rose averaged 16, I can see him tacking on and extra 3 points just on free throws. Let alone an improving jumper. His assist numbers will also grow by 1 or 2 this year. D.Rose is going to surprise a lot of people, and looking at his first preseason game it looks as if he is improving his defensive technique. Going forward I don’t see why anyone would think Billups will be beter than Rose. I saw a comment saying it would be a surprise if Rose was an all-star this year, I think it would be a disappointment if he wasn’t. I can see D.Rose at about 22.5 & 7 this year easy.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 1:09 pm
    Tariq are you talking about impact on the team? Or stats? I’d say he will most likely have better stats than chauncey seeing as their numbers were pretty close this past season and we all know rose will improve this year. If he got 17 and 6 last year what’s the diff between 20 and 8?

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 1:12 pm
    I’m defending this pick even though I kind of agree joe johnson is better. But the other people mentioned , devin harris? Please. If rose was handed the keys the nets the way harris was he would be ridiculous. Chauncey is a better player too but not more statistically productive.

  • J.Deneer Posted: Oct.5 at 1:26 pm
    The “myth” of Yi, better be #17.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 1:27 pm
    Plus vinny del negro is the coach and that’s good for -3 points a game. Worst coach in the league. Even worse than micheal curry and terry porter were.

  • tavoris Posted: Oct.5 at 1:39 pm
    Bryan, I see your Del Negro and raise you a Don Nelson

  • Russ Bengtson Posted: Oct.5 at 1:44 pm
    If he progresses the way I think he should, Rose absolutely should be an All-Star lock this season — who are the better point guards in the East? — but fan voting and team record and Vinny Del Negro’s “coaching” may conspire to keep him off.

  • Ryne Nelson Posted: Oct.5 at 1:47 pm
    That’s the thing, Bryan. If I’m going for a player who will provide Playoff composure and leadership, I’d be comfortable with Rose (as opposed to say… Billups). Rose doesn’t seem to ever get flustered, as evidenced by his play in the NCAA Tournament and as a huge underdog against the Celtics. Elsewise, Rose is better than Billups in everything but long-range accuracy.

  • Ryne Nelson Posted: Oct.5 at 1:50 pm
    And I hear you, Russ. If he’s not an All-Star, the SLAMonline crew will score an *epic* fail.

  • ab_40 Posted: Oct.5 at 1:52 pm
    bulls season hinges on luol deng not on D Rose. But still he’s gonna do good this year jsut not 22 6 and 8 they have three guys who can only run the floor and rebound, thomas, noah and now gibson. I don’t know if there will be a lot of rebs left for him.

  • Afonso Posted: Oct.5 at 1:54 pm
    THIS LIST JUST LOST ALL CREDEBILITY I THOUGHT THEY HAD…..AND SLAM TOO, UNFORTUNATLY… EVEN O.J MAYO SHOULD TOP ROSE… WE ALL SAW THIS COMING, WE ALL LIKE THE KID, HAS GREAT FUTURE BUT THERE´S NO WAY HE IS EVEN TOP 30.. 18?!?!?! YOU GUYS LOST YOUR MIND, DEFENETLY~ better than DAVID WEST, BIG ALL, DEVIN HARRIS, DANNY GRANGER, IGUODALA, BILLUPS, BUTLER, ALDRIDGE, RONDO ETC?!?!?!?!?!!? IS THIS THE CHICAGO BULLS OFFIIAL SITE?, I MEAN, THE KÍD SHOOTS ALMOST AS UGLY AS RONDO AND A 17and7 kid should be better than the guys i´ve mentioned??!?! THIS IS RIDICULOUS!!! F…ING AMATOURS

  • Enigmatic Posted: Oct.5 at 1:58 pm
    Afonso, lay off the caps lock and look into spell check. And yeah, he’s better than all the players you mentioned. Aldridge? Are you kidding me???

  • airs Posted: Oct.5 at 1:59 pm
    hate hate hatehatehate
    y’all that hate are ignorant.
    he’s getting his minutes for sure and when he does, you all are gonna eat your words.
    not too high, not in the slightest.
    DROSE 4 MVP ahhah, hate on that for a bit.

  • Afonso Posted: Oct.5 at 1:59 pm
    FUC.ING AMATEURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PUT HIM TOP 5…EVEN AHEAD OF LEBRON AND KOBE AS YOU GUYS DON´T HAVE SHAME IN CALLING YOURSELVES A MAGAZINE…

  • airs Posted: Oct.5 at 2:00 pm
    and way to go slam for not putting him on the front page, you suck as well. thanks!

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 2:06 pm
    Ryne said:
    “If I’m going for a player who will provide Playoff composure and leadership, I’d be comfortable with Rose (as opposed to say… Billups). Rose doesn’t seem to ever get flustered, as evidenced by his play in the NCAA Tournament and as a huge underdog against the Celtics
    WTH
    Now, I think Chauncey’s “Mr. Big Shot” rep is a tad inflated, but come on now. Are you seriously saying that you think Derrick Rose is more poised and a better leader than Billups in the post season? Based on what? What possible criteria supports that?
    Chauncey was the undisputed leader of a team that went to six Eastern conference finals and two Finals, and got one ring. He is credited for changing the entire team culture in Denver. Chauncey gave the best point guard in the NBA the freaking BUSINESS in the first round of the playoffs last year.
    Derrick Rose’s first playoff game was freaking amazing, but for the rest of the season he was just pretty good, while he got torched by a cat who averaged a triple double. Rose is SPECTACULAR and he might have a better regular season than Billups, but in the playoffs Billups is still the better bet.

  • Russ Bengtson Posted: Oct.5 at 2:07 pm
    For the record, the age argument is sort of pointless. Kevin Durant just turned 21 himself, and clearly he’s ranked even higher.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 2:07 pm
    Russ:
    I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Rose made it in the East. Not at all. But he’s not a lock. Fan voting has been the cause of some shady selections over the years, but if Wade and Joe Johnson are the starters, well, then that’s what I would “project” at this point in time (I realize that Joe is not a PG, just saying). As for the reserves, Rose has some pretty tough competition at the guard spot: Rondo, Harris, Jameer Nelson. And that’s not taking into consideration if Gilbert Arenas makes a resurgence. So, my point is: Rose could very well be an all-star next season, but he ain’t a lock. Joe Johnson is a lock.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 2:08 pm
    Russ:
    I think Durant is on a different level.

  • Afonso Posted: Oct.5 at 2:09 pm
    I´M NOT ENGLISH OR AMERICAN SO THE GRAMAR MISTAKES ARE NORMAL…AND YEAH, GINOBILI, TURKOGLU,J JOHNSON OR LODOM ARE 10 TIMES BETTER THAN THE KID, FOR THE NEXT YEAR TOO… YEAH I SAID ALDRIDGE…WITH ROY,LED HIS TEAM TO 54 WINS IN A CONFERENCE IN WITCH THE BULLS WOULD HAVE BEEN DEAD LAST, MAYBE CHICAGO COULD STAY AHEAD OF SAC TOWN…LOL

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 2:10 pm
    Didn’t Derrick Rose miss two crucial free throws to give his team a win or something in the Final Four?

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 2:14 pm
    That being said, I hope Rose tears the league up and proves me wrong. I’d love to see that.

  • Freaknick Posted: Oct.5 at 2:15 pm
    The way they present the list (09-10 expected performance) makes me think of it like this: If there were a draft for ONE SEASON league, how far do you think D-Rose would fall? Honestly, can you tell me you’d pick some of these guys you’ve mentioned (Aldridge, D-West, Iguodala, Devin Harris) ahead of Rose? He might already have the best combo of strength/quickness in the league (for a PG…D-Will the lone competitor), and he can play on both ends of the floor. Think about it, if there’s only one thing everybody’s hating on–his shot from distance–then everything else must be pretty damn good. Maybe he’s a bit too high too early, but not more than 22-24 range. “SLAM has lost credibility as a magazine” ?? Come on.

  • Enigmatic Posted: Oct.5 at 2:15 pm
    @ Afonso – “Aldridge….with Roy, led his team to 54 wins in a conference in which” blah, blah blah. This isn’t a list of the top duos in the NBA, this is a list of who the best players will be next year, according to Slam. Aldridge alone is not better than Rose. And as for the Bulls being dead last if they were in the west? Come on now, if your knowledge of the NBA is that low, you really have no room to talk on any of this. Where you from anyways?

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 2:15 pm
    OK, Afonso is going a bit too far.

  • TADOne Posted: Oct.5 at 2:17 pm
    All of this talk has made me realize that the East has some pretty unremarkable PG’s.

  • airs Posted: Oct.5 at 2:17 pm
    yeah its not the site the sucks. its actually the people commenting on the site. sorry slam, i apologize.

  • Enigmatic Posted: Oct.5 at 2:22 pm
    @ TADOne – that’s exactly why Rose will be an all-star this year! Don’t think he’d get it in the West though…

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 2:37 pm
    For this coming season I’m picking chauncey but drose is hot on his heels.

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 2:40 pm
    Hold up, Allen your last post confused me. Miss 2 free throws to win? Huh?

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 2:41 pm
    TADOne:
    Co-sign.

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 2:55 pm
    Klav
    My bad, he missed one free throw against Kansas.

  • Afonso Posted: Oct.5 at 2:56 pm
    i like DRose.hes top 10 Pg and can be top3 in 5 years… FREAKKNICK…youre exactly right!!!thats how I see it: a 1 YEAR LEAGUE SEASON, like who would I pick to play in my team for one year…AND ROSE IS LIKE 36th..behind all those I´ve mentioned…I´ve got nothing against the Bulls or Rose but even OJ Mayo was as good last year… Enigmatic..I dont hate noone and obviously I was joking on the Bulls being last but they would not discuss the 8th spot in the west thats for sure…30 wins maybe…

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 3:07 pm
    Allen, thanks, I thought I missed something. That game I was in class, so if anything I was gonna look it up on youtube. Haha.

  • Spaceship Jay Posted: Oct.5 at 3:11 pm
    Thank You Allenp.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 3:14 pm
    @Alfonso, OJ is good, but Memphis didn’t even sniff the playoffs last year. Derrick Rose went 7 games w/the defending champs. Your argument is based off personal preference.

  • tavoris Posted: Oct.5 at 3:22 pm
    Tariq, Rose almost made it in as a reserve last season. That’s how big an impact he had on the league. I wouldn’t b surprised AT ALL if he gets voted a starter this year.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:29 pm
    tavoris:
    My point is that Rose is not the 18th-best player in the league right now, nor do I project him to be the 18th-best player in the league this season. The 18th-best player is someone like a Chauncey or a Joe Johnson. Joe Johnson is, barring injury, a LOCK for the all-star team. Derrick Rose has a good shot of making it, but he’s not a lock. It’s just one way of saying he should be a bit lower, like 22-24. That’s where you get the types of players who, like Rose, are knocking on the fringes of the all-star team and may consider “snubs” if they don’t make it. That’s why I brought up the all-star team.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 3:29 pm
    @Alfonso… Oh yeah, Derrick Rose is a top 5 PG in the league right now, easily. Because his shot isn’t the greatest, he doesn’t deserve to be ranked highly? Like Ed Lover would say, c’mon son! No man crushes allowed in here.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:30 pm
    * may be considered

  • Niya-girl-fresh Posted: Oct.5 at 3:34 pm
    He deserves this spot, sorry this is a perfect spot for him. He took his team to the playoffs as a rookie, and had a 30 point game in his first playoff game ever, dude had a coming out party for real.

  • Jacob J Posted: Oct.5 at 3:39 pm
    This is hilarious that Derrick Rose from Chicago that is just a second year player is nuimber 18 and is better than danny granger,KD,Joe Johnson and Shaq along with many others.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:41 pm
    Bryan Crawford:
    I think Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Tony Parker, Chauncey Billups and Steve Nash would like a word with you.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:41 pm
    Jacob J:
    Shaq? Really?

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 3:43 pm
    All: The SLAM Top 50 ranking is based on a players “projected” performance ON THE COURT this season, not the best players in the L 1-50. That being said, of course Derrick Rose is going to rank higher (obviously not by much) than Chauncey Billups, OJ Mayo and whoever else’s name has been thrown out because of the simple fact that D Rose is all the Bulls have. He’s a PG so the ball will be in his hands at all times and the offense is going to run through him. Barring injury, he can’t help but have a big contribution for Chicago this season. As Ryne said, it’s an ambitious ranking, but it’s not ridiculous or far fetched as some have tried to make it seem.

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 3:45 pm
    Tariq
    I don’t think Steve Nash and Derrick Rose should be in the same sentence, ever. Last time it generated 200 comments. SMH. And I like them both, but I would rather have DRose, somebody who is more committed to playing defense – thereby justifying a good but not great offensive showing. So yeah I agree that Rose is top 5 already.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:46 pm
    Bryan:
    You just said he’s a Top-5 PG. Easily.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 3:47 pm
    Tariq, I counted CP3, D-Will & Billups ahead of Rose. As far as Nash and Tony Parker, neither of them could do what Rose did given the same squad.

  • Ashenafie Posted: Oct.5 at 3:48 pm
    Slam has lost its mind

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:49 pm
    And, by the way, this ranking is not “ridiculous.” Jacob J saying that Shaq should be ranked higher than Rose is ridiculous. Ranking Brandon Haywood at 42 would be ridiculous. I just think this is a BIT high. Sorry for not having the exact same opinion.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:50 pm
    Bryan: If you think Rose is better than Parker NOW, then I don’t know what to tell you.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 3:53 pm
    Tariq: Actually I do, and there’s nothing you can tell me. TP has had the luxury of playing on a great team with one of the greatest players ever his whole career. Like I said, Tony Parker couldn’t do what Derrick Rose did as a rookie given the same squad.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 3:54 pm
    I’m a tony parker hater so I might have to agree.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 3:56 pm
    Klav:
    Nash is definitely a defensive liability, which is why I was so down on him during the infamous SLAM Top 50 of ALL-TIME debacle. That being said, a rookie who averaged 16 and 6 is not better than Steve fuc*ing Nash. Sorry. P.S.
    Rose is not exactly Gary Payton.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 3:58 pm
    In my opinion once tony parker loses his speed he’s done, his skills to ME are average but his speed and quickness make up for lack of fundamental skills.

  • doyouwantmore Posted: Oct.5 at 3:58 pm
    I don’t know who the writer is, but they don’t know how to spell Allen Iverson’s name.

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 4:04 pm
    Bryan
    That’s like saying once Lebron gets slow, he’s done.
    Or that once Derrick Rose loses his speed, he’s done.
    Or Iverson
    Or 90 percent of the cats who dominate on a nightly basis. Most cats in the League dominate becuase they are not only skilled, but have good to great athleticism.
    As a rookie, nah, Tony Parker couldn’t do what Derrick Rose did.
    Right now?
    I think Tony Parker could have done the exact same thing, and he MIGHT have beaten Boston with KG.

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 4:05 pm
    My bad, Boston WITHOUT KG.
    I like Parker’s chances with Derrick Rose’s teammates.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 4:06 pm
    Tariq: Steve Nash averaged 3.3pts & 2.3asts his rookie year. Last year he averaged 15.7pts & 9.7asts. Looks like D Rose is on his heels. So your point is?

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 4:09 pm
    Derrick Rose may well develop into a better player than Tony Parker. But that Tony Parker is RIGHT NOW a superior player is so self-evident, that I won’t even attempt to make the argument. If you want to believe that Rose is the better player, go ahead. I’ll just assume that you have some rooting interest (Bull fan/Memphis fan)and stop arguing with you.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 4:10 pm
    Allenp, no way Tony Parker does the same thing with the Bulls. In fact, take him off the Spurs and make him the focal point of a team and we won’t be talking about him at all anymore. Correction, yes we will. We’ll be talking about how overrated he is. Playing on the Spurs in that offense makes him look a lot better than what he is. And that’s not to say he sucks, because he doesn’t. But I’m just keeping it real.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 4:11 pm
    Bryan Crawford: You’re not making any sense.

  • jdn41 Posted: Oct.5 at 4:13 pm
    SHIIIIEEEETTTTT (clay davis) 18th best in the league, iverson came in with better numbers than this guy and will leave with better numbers than this guy and iverson is 50th… okay ben gordan will leave but did everyone forget about the return of leul dang dude was dropping 20 ppg before injuries and word has it that hes healthy this year, toss another 20 ppg forward in salmons, and theres no way he’s averaging 22,8,6 thats some bull, even if he does get that stat line which is unbelievable would you guys say thats better than al jefferson PROVEN 23 ppg 11rpg and 2bpg or how about danny granger 26 ppg 5 rpg 1 steal 1.5 blocks and devin harris dude was second banana and still got 21 ppg and 7 apg now he is the clear cut top dog and your telling me rose is better…rose is good but not this good don’t even get me started on that three pointer of his

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 4:13 pm
    “Steve Nash averaged 3.3pts & 2.3asts his rookie year. Last year he averaged 15.7pts & 9.7asts. Looks like D Rose is on his heels. So your point is?” What is this supposed to mean?

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 4:14 pm
    Bryan
    FIBA.
    That’s my retort. Tony Parker KILLS everybody in FIBA. With Ronny Turiaf as his second best player.
    I think given the talent on the Bulls, given his court saavy, Parker beats Boston.
    You are underrating what Parker does. Yes, Duncan is a huge crutch, but I’ve seen Tony destroy enough cats with Duncan out or on the bench that I KNOW that he would have had a field day with the Bulls.
    He would averaged 22-23 easily, and given you about 7-8 assists.
    You are undervaluing Parker’s court sense for real. Dude knows the game, his jumper is wetter than Rose’s and he finishes just as well if not as spectacularly.
    Rose is the better player if you compare them as rookies, but not now. Not at all.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 4:14 pm
    Tariq: I’m a Chicagoan, a Bulls fan, & I come from the same neighborhood as D Rose. But I don’t base my argument off any of that. For the record, any Argument I make is strictly basketball based, not on being a fan boy or having a man crush on anybody. I don’t do that. I’m a writer, it’s against the code.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 4:16 pm
    AllenP, FIBA? He’s supposed to kill in FIBA. You seem to be making the assumption that FIBA talent is equal to the NBA’s.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 4:17 pm
    Nah allen I guess I understated how poor I think his fundamentals are. I hear what you’re saying but I think tp is a subpar shooter and not in the allen iverson takes 30 low percentage shots kind of way but in the actually is a poor shooter kind of way. His passing is decent but not great, I think he’s an overrated defender. If you take away lebrons speed he’s still going to be a strong rebounding great passing power forward who has skils. If you take away tony parkers speed to get into the lane what do you have?

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 4:20 pm
    AllenP, and if you look at the stats, aside from dropping 6 more ppg’s the numbers between the two are similar, and D Rose doesn’t have a Tim Duncan or anything close to it.

  • TADOne Posted: Oct.5 at 4:20 pm
    I don’t like tony Parker, never have. However, for the NBA 2009-2010 season: Parker > Rose.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 4:22 pm
    Allenp:
    Next thing you’ll be trying to convince cats that LeBron is better than Caron Butler.

  • jdn41 Posted: Oct.5 at 4:23 pm
    make shaq 6’3, take away reggie miller’s jumpshot, and take away cp3 entire right leg while your at it. who freaking cares if one guy has an ability that he uses to his advantage everyone’s made differently syaing a player is useless without this or that is not only speculating but also entirely pointless

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 4:23 pm
    Parker will put up better numbers for sure.

  • Bryan Crawford Posted: Oct.5 at 4:27 pm
    Tariq, you said a rookie averaging 16 & 6 isn’t better than Steve Nash so I just dropped their numbers.

  • Enigmatic Posted: Oct.5 at 4:31 pm
    Dudes just need to accept it. Derrick Rose is the truth. I can sympathize a bit with those who think Rose might be a bit too high on this list, but those who say Rose doesn’t deserve to be on this list at all need to stop calling themselves basketball fans.

  • MeloMan2.0 Posted: Oct.5 at 4:42 pm
    ok honestly, d rose is a beast! hes like a mini lebron… but right now, Billups is the better player. even though i think he recieved a tad too much praise for the Nuggets success last year, if drose was on the nuggets instead, they probably wouldn’t do as good

  • slick ric Posted: Oct.5 at 4:46 pm
    D rose is going to prove all the haters wrong this year, people thought he should not of been the # 1 draft pick but he came away with the rookie of the year and led his team to the playoffs. say what you wanna say but this guy is the real deal and he is going to show that this season because he feeds off the obsurd scrunity u fools give, he going to average great numbers and make the allstar team for many years to come. bi***es

  • slick ric Posted: Oct.5 at 4:46 pm
    D rose is going to prove all the haters wrong this year, people thought he should not of been the # 1 draft pick but he came away with the rookie of the year and led his team to the playoffs. say what you wanna say but this guy is the real deal and he is going to show that this season because he feeds off the obsurd scrunity u fools give, he going to average great numbers and make the allstar team for many years to come. bi***es

  • slick ric Posted: Oct.5 at 4:46 pm
    D rose is going to prove all the haters wrong this year, people thought he should not of been the # 1 draft pick but he came away with the rookie of the year and led his team to the playoffs. say what you wanna say but this guy is the real deal and he is going to show that this season because he feeds off the obsurd scrunity u fools give, he going to average great numbers and make the allstar team for many years to come. bi***es

  • fonz Posted: Oct.5 at 4:46 pm
    all i got to say is that the bulls are going to be the magic of last year. The suprise upset to make it to the finals. A starting lineup of rose, salmons, deng, thomas and noah (who by the way both added upper body muscle) A a bench of johnson, gibson, pargo, miller and hinrich is one of the best if not the best group to come of the bench in the nba

  • slick ric Posted: Oct.5 at 4:46 pm
    D rose is going to prove all the haters wrong this year, people thought he should not of been the # 1 draft pick but he came away with the rookie of the year and led his team to the playoffs. say what you wanna say but this guy is the real deal and he is going to show that this season because he feeds off the obsurd scrunity u fools give, he going to average great numbers and make the allstar team for many years to come. bi***es

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 4:51 pm
    Bryan:
    What do Nash’s rookie numbers have to do with anything??
    P.S.
    Say hi to DRose’s cousin Greg for me.

  • TADOne Posted: Oct.5 at 4:52 pm
    People are really passionate about Rose one way or another. I feel as though he is a few spots too high, but i’m quite sure that shouldn’t make me a ‘hater’. I miss the days where we could debate on here without people saying you are stupid or hating when you feel as though one or two proven players should be ranked ahead of players on the fringe. It is all opinions at the end of the day.

  • Hussman25 Posted: Oct.5 at 4:54 pm
    HOW IS D-ROSE BETTER THAN “MR. BIG SHOT!” Im done already… Chauncey needs to be top 15! PERIOD! This may be the most argued entry in the top 50!

  • Moose Posted: Oct.5 at 4:57 pm
    It’s about effing time.

  • tealish Posted: Oct.5 at 4:57 pm
    @Enigmatic: I don’t think anyone’s arguing that he shouldn’t be top 50… just that it’s silly how he’s projected to be the 18th best player in the L this upcoming season. Let’s do without building men of the straw variety.

  • Shem Posted: Oct.5 at 5:01 pm
    Not a Drose hater but im sure we can all agree you cant place a rookie as the 18th best nba player. He isnt better then Billups, Jefferson, Johnson and some others BUT he will be and he is a special talent.

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 5:08 pm
    Let’s seem to break this down…Who are some of the best players in the NBA? (I’M GOING TO MISS A LOT OF PEOPLE) PG: CP3, Deron, Chauncey, TP, Jameer, Devin, Rondo, Rose, Gil, Ivey; SG: Kobe, Wade, Roy, T-Mac; SF: LeBron, Melo, Durant, Caron, DannyG, Iggy; PF: TD, Garnett, Pau, Amar’e, Al Jeff, Booze; Centers: Yao, Dwight, Shaq. So I just name dropped a bunch of people by respective positions, but just off the top of my head it seriously seems like the most abundant positions with elite players are pg’s and sf’s. SF’s is a clear-cut winner with LBJ, but PG’s after the top 2 spots (which is still pretty debatable to most) it gets really murky. They all have great skills and can excel, except they also have obvious deficiencies in their games. Idk, I’ll take a second year Rose over an aging pg (regardless if he’s spectacular now), my perfect example is when Boston used Rondo. He won a championship as a second year player, with arguably the best finishing team in recent memory. Idk, pg’s are hard to rank, really because they all have a lot of overlapping games.

  • JUFU Posted: Oct.5 at 5:11 pm
    Um, let’s all think about this. first, D-Rose is a legit player, even as a rookie. second, nash is gonna be worse than Rose this season. he ain’t gettin’ any younger, and ditto with billups, who has a LOT of talent with him on the nuggets. finally, name ten other players (retired or otherwise) that, as rookies besides d-rose who actually led their team into the playoffs. the kid is legit.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 5:15 pm
    Cosign tad.

  • 360vue Posted: Oct.5 at 5:17 pm
    im almost dont want to be mean; but this board can often be moron-central. how many times have people explained this ranking system and yet others still take offence to some positions as if their own child has been smacked silly during the process. personally, i dont have a problem with this kid. hes about six months younger than me and hes done stuff that ill never do. the only thing he should be getting is applause but too many idiots think its alright to hate on someone they havent even given a chance. so what if rose has been shoved down ur throats as ROY or #1 draft pick. THATS CALLED INEVITABILITY, deal with it, because thats the medias problem not his. this kids got game and from what ive heard of him hes got a functioning brain up there along with common sense, which for such a precocious talent really should be admired when most are stuck up morons who couldnt be any further detached from the real world if they were in a parallel universe

  • B-Moore Posted: Oct.5 at 5:19 pm
    co sign moose.

  • nbk Posted: Oct.5 at 5:20 pm
    to imply Derrick Rose will be this much better then Billups this year is a little crazy slam. Billups has been to 7 Conference Finals in a ROW…..the only other person to do that is Wilt Chamberlain. Good write up though, but I disagree with the ranking

  • 360vue Posted: Oct.5 at 5:20 pm
    “duhhhh im a spastic…. rose isnt 18th best in the L. play wit it. duhhhh
    … ur shut the duhhh up, he isnt the 18th best in the L MORONS, they are PROJECTING THIS SEASONS STATS. AND ON A BULLS TEAM WITHOUT GORDON AND DENG POSSIBLY NOT RETURNING TO HIS OLD FORM FOR MONTHS, ROSE IS GONNA BE IN THE LEAGUE LEADERS FOR POINTS AND ASSISTS. ROLL WITH IT

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 5:20 pm
    That’s all well and good, Klav, but here’s where your argument breaks down: see that 2nd-year player you mentioned? The one who won a chip with Boston? Even when he won that chip, he still wasn’t as good as those “aging pgs” you seem to dislike. You think that Boston team wouldn’t have won with about 10 other PGs running the show? Also, 3rd-year Rondo was a LOT better than 2nd-year Rondo. But I can still debate Billups vs Rose this COMING season. We can have a convo about that. But to say that he’s ALREADY better than Nash and Parker is just laughable.

  • PANAGIOTIS VASILOPOULOS Posted: Oct.5 at 5:23 pm
    @Moose….4:57 pm: BAD BOY!!!!

  • larry bird Posted: Oct.5 at 5:26 pm
    PANAGIOTIS, ???

  • Moose Posted: Oct.5 at 5:27 pm
    That last comment was by me, had no idea why it showed up as larry bird.

  • PANAGIOTIS VASILOPOULOS Posted: Oct.5 at 5:31 pm
    …..>Parker>Diamantidis>Calderon>Spanoulis>….>Sarunas>D.Rose>Rubio>……>Rondo>J.R.Holden>……>Lakovic>…….>Me>Iverson.

  • Afonso Posted: Oct.5 at 5:53 pm
    @ BRYAN CRAWFORD…ARE YOU TALKIN ABOUT YOUR MAN CRUSH WITH ROSE?!?! I SAID HES 10 AFTER CP3, DWILL, TP, BILLUPS, HARRIS, JAMEER, RONDO, KIDD, ETC…SAYIN ROSE IS BETTER, TODAY, THAN THIS 8 GUYS IS YOUR MAN CRUSH, DONT INVOLVE ME IN THAT…THATS YOUR THING SON..

  • Garett Posted: Oct.5 at 6:00 pm
    18th best in the league? Probably not. More like 30. But for this upcoming season, in his situation, I think it’s pretty close. A little high, but not criminal. Chill.

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 6:00 pm
    Tariq, I wasn’t directing that at you, just some food for discussion for all. But I don’t have anything against aging pg’s, I’m just tired of having people hype up players more than what the’re worth NOW. Do I think Nash could lead a championship team at this stage in his career? No. Do I think Devin Harris could lead a championship team now? No. And I wouldn’t even give it to Rose at this point. I think everybody speculates way too much on the given talent that we’re blessed to watch over an 82 game schedule. There are plenty of good floor generals, and everybody will have their reason why this guy is better than that guy or if he were on this team or whatever. To me it’s just numbing how people can banter for so long on a topic that has been debated since what? The last 10 rankings? I’m done with PG rankings and Kobe vs. LeBron. That ish is more played out than hooker p****. I’m going to sit back and watch people argue. And Spanny’s rank of world pg’s is the best comment of the day. (Not joking either)

  • Tdot Posted: Oct.5 at 6:02 pm
    360vue some basketball fans realize a player can be better then his stats project and vice versa. Like Derrick Rose who will have better stats then Billups without a doubt will not be better because Billups will lead his team to more victories, he shoot a better % in the 4th quarter, and will also have a lower turnover ratio. Just because derrick Rose goes for 22, 7, and 4 this year does not make him better then Billups. In my opinion

  • nbk Posted: Oct.5 at 6:04 pm
    that last comment by tdot was me. Slam is one messed up message board

  • Moose Posted: Oct.5 at 6:04 pm
    @ Alfonso: He didn’t mean RIGHT NOW. He means this season.
    @ Garett: Couldn’t agree more.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 6:09 pm
    Klav: You make a lot of good points. I don’t think Nash could ever have “lead” a team to a chip. But that boston team was loaded. i think they coulda won with him. devin too. and rose.

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 6:14 pm
    360
    Nah, you’re wrong. They aren’t predicting stats. If they were “predicting stats” Iverson wouldn’t have been 50 and Josh Smith wouldn’t have been 40. If they were predicting stats, OJ Mayo would have been higher.
    They are predicting who is going to be…Hell, I don’t really know..
    Lang said in his Ivey piece that there is NO WAY Iverson is the 50th best player in the NBA next season.
    NONE.
    But, he’s ranked in that position because that’s how people perceive his worth. It ain’t about stats, if it was about stats Igoudala wouldn’t have been number 26.
    It’s about some nebulous concept of who is the “better player in an NBA system according to what NBA teams are looking for.”
    It is what it is, but people have questioned the system and I think rightfully so. Calling people stupid is counterproductive especically when you aren’t making a coherent argument.
    Bryan
    I think Tony’s fundamentals as a shooter have improved greatly, and are no worse than Rose’s. I think his court sense and saavy are lightyears ahead of Roses, as they should be given his time in the league. Rose is obviously an athletic freak, but I think Parker’s all around game is better than Roses and I expect it to be better next year. I also think that given Parker’s all around game, he would have put up better numbers and had comparable team success playing point for the Bulls last year.
    I haven’t really seen where you’ve explained why you think Parker’s game is so different from Rose’s that he wouldn’t have put up the same 16 and 6 on 47 percent shooting.

  • niQ Posted: Oct.5 at 6:16 pm
    Klav you should be careful when using the term Ivey.. Cause well, I thought you were referring to Royal Ivey. LOL

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 6:21 pm
    Tariq while we’re at it I think that team could’ve won with Derek Fisher. LOL Rondo didn’t play a ridiculous part in Boston’s eventual win, although I will credit him for being a HELL of a lot better than Eddie House as pointman. I’ve said it a billion times, when you got Vladimir Radmanovic guarding Pierce, you might as well hand the team the Larry O’Brien. PJ disappointed me by not using Ariza that year, and now Ariza’s head got too big and let his agent do the talking. I’m still optimistic for the repeat, but the likelihood is getting dimmer and dimmer. And while we’re on the topic,LA wouldn’t nearly benefit from a superstar pg like teams. They just need somebody to regulate distribution and knock down shots, thats why I love the triangle.

  • Klav Posted: Oct.5 at 6:22 pm
    niQ, haha I remember when that post came up where “Ivey re-signs with Sixers” and everybody went apesh!t. GOTCHA! Haha.

  • TADOne Posted: Oct.5 at 6:23 pm
    I’m patiently awaiting the Kevin Durant write-up.

  • niQ Posted: Oct.5 at 6:26 pm
    @PANAGIOTIS VASILOPOULOS. His list is flawed because he forgot to add my name in it.
    @TADOne. He’ll most likely be top 10 at this rate.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 6:30 pm
    Allenp:
    You are way too level-headed for this site. Bryan made a very compelling argument for why Tony Parker couldn’t do what Derrick Rose did: “Bryan is from Chicago and is from the same neighborhood as DRose.” How can you argue with that? That’s about as iron-clad as you can get.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 6:32 pm
    Oh, and Parker plays with Duncan. I think that was his other thing.

  • Afonso Posted: Oct.5 at 6:32 pm
    jjohnson, big All, Caron Butler, Turkoglu, LOdom, DHarris, Ginobili, Rondo and a few more are far and WWAAAYYYY better than DRose TODAY and NEXT SEASON… so,Rose lovers,(yes SLAM, i´m lookin at you)…deal with this reality and try to make a better ranking next year…

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.5 at 6:33 pm
    This blows. I’m going to go watch the Packers and Vikings.

  • Allenp Posted: Oct.5 at 6:39 pm
    Afonso
    You should stop. Really. People remember what you write on here.

  • Bryan Posted: Oct.5 at 6:49 pm
    I wasn’t saying tony parker couldn’t put up the same numbers as derrick rose? What I was saying is that derrick rose has better vision, more strength and better ball handling and at 27 his jumper isn’t going to get much better and derrick rose already has better fundamental form imo. Now the arguement was never made that derrick rose should be higher on this list than tony parker just that in my book I think tp is overrated and derrick rose has more tools to work with I guess.

  • Afonso Posted: Oct.5 at 7:11 pm
    TP is UNDERrated and fundamentals are one of TP best weapons, that foot work in the paint against the giants is as fundamentaly sound as you can get…hes the 3rd best PG right now.. DRose is an athletic freak who could reach DWill and CP3 in 3-5 years..in my opinion hes not the purest PG as his strenght is attacking the rim..but he can and will grow as a playmaker

  • Dyce Posted: Oct.5 at 7:22 pm
    Derrick Rose is in the same mold of point guard that stephon marbuy is….Dont think hes going to be winning championships on his great play.

  • onlyclipfanonslam Posted: Oct.5 at 7:27 pm
    Interesting… I agree with much that has already been said. Should be around no25 IMO

  • Wesjet23 Posted: Oct.5 at 7:48 pm
    rather have joe johnson or billups any day
    maybe take rose in 3 years

  • Vegas Posted: Oct.5 at 7:49 pm
    umm, that much better than Rondo? I put Rose at 23rd

  • Vegas Posted: Oct.5 at 7:49 pm
    umm, that much better than Rondo? I put Rose at 23rd

  • T.J. Posted: Oct.5 at 8:11 pm
    Overrated. Dude has no rings. no asgs. not alot of anything but a good rookie season. I think he got his position more of his potential rather than what he’s actually accomplished. After seeing what Rajon averaged against him in their series I definately wouldn’t list him above JJ, C.Billups, Nash etc. He’s definately top 25 but no way he’s top 20. He’s gotta do more then have one good season to have me ranking him up with the players that have worked hard and earned their spots in the top 20.

  • MC Pats Posted: Oct.5 at 8:21 pm
    Rose is good but not 18th good… yet. Next season definitely top 15 but not top 20 this one. I’d take all the players from 19th to 40th in this list before Derrick Rose.

  • Ronald Michael Soriano Posted: Oct.5 at 8:33 pm
    Overrated! Damn, He’s better than JJ? Better than Danny G? Better than Steve Nash? This guy has proven nothing! Laughable indeed! He won’t even top Chicago in scoring and won’t even be top 5 in assists! Overrated!

  • Lucas Posted: Oct.5 at 9:13 pm
    I bet either Amare or Duncan are next

  • Moose Posted: Oct.5 at 9:43 pm
    Tony Parker, Chris Bosh, Paul Pierce or Pau Gasol is next.

  • aj Posted: Oct.5 at 9:57 pm
    way, way too high. He’s gonna get there, but he’s not even close to a top 20 spot now.

  • Logues Posted: Oct.5 at 10:38 pm
    agree completely with aj, SLAM how can u say that rose is better than billups?

  • Blackrick Posted: Oct.5 at 10:41 pm
    I dont think you guys understand just how good this kid is.When he was at Memphis he destroyed every point guard he went against in the NCAA tournament,read what i said,DESTROYED!!Not to mention he was only a freshman.He goes on to be rookie of the year and has one of the greatest playoff debuts in NBA history!!And he’s only gonna get better,that’s the scary thing.He’s about to ball out of his mind this year,mark it down.Physically no point guard in the league can deal with his size,speed and uber-athleticism and i mean nobody!Throw in the fact that despite his physical gifts he’s still a true pg and looks to get everybody involved and then things get more scary.This kid is a top 20 player without question and who knows?,by seasons end we might be talking about this kid top 10.

  • Mack Posted: Oct.5 at 11:48 pm
    really? Derrick Rose < Joe Johnson? maybe next year

  • Mack Posted: Oct.5 at 11:49 pm
    lol I mean joe johnson is better

  • Orlando Green Posted: Oct.5 at 11:57 pm
    Drose’s court prod will be better than C-Bills and Nash so thats why he is higher…period. Good spot

  • Jukai Posted: Oct.6 at 12:40 am
    ARENAS OVER AI ARE YOU @*$*)(*# KIDDING ME?

  • I am the walrus Posted: Oct.6 at 12:46 am
    Now this is ridiculos.I know this is based mostly on prodjected performance for the upcoming season, but damn it Slam you can’t put a young player with one season under his belt and say he is the 18th best player in the NBA. He is not the 18th best player in the best league in the whole world. He ain’t that much better than Rondo, JJ, Billups,Odom just to name a few. I’m not a hater but i think this is way too high…

  • BIG Z Posted: Oct.6 at 2:08 am
    if these rankings are based on 2009-10 projections. Then how high will Durant be im thinkin at least #9

  • Anton Posted: Oct.6 at 3:08 am
    Stupid ranking system. I like last year’s best players in the game RIGHT NOW criteria.

  • minikidd Posted: Oct.6 at 3:23 am
    @ T.J.:”He’s definately top 25 but no way he’s top 20″..!? Wth, that statement doesn’t make any sense…

  • tealish Posted: Oct.6 at 3:28 am
    No Anton, that would make too much sense. I only tease, SLAM. I only tease.

  • josh Posted: Oct.6 at 7:31 am
    he should be in the 25-30 range….

  • Furious Posted: Oct.6 at 7:41 am
    minikidd, that makes perfect sense. obviously tj is saying that he should have been 25-21, but that there is no way he deserves any higher. not that hard to understand.

  • don Posted: Oct.6 at 8:08 am
    “Only Paul, Iverson and Kidd averaged more assists then Rose as a rookie, ” — this proves that AI is really that good.

  • jk_light Posted: Oct.6 at 9:42 am
    I think it’s kind of funny if somebody says that the ranking is totally unbelievable and he should be 3 places up or down (Counts for every player, not just this ranking for D.Rose). Who are you that you exactly know where people should be ranked? Everybody has a different opinion and this is the Average of some people, that have way more information then nearly everybody on this board. So you can all state your opinion but most are doing as if they have the one and only (right) answer.

  • minikidd Posted: Oct.6 at 9:46 am
    Furious, i’ll just have to disagree with you then.. I don’t see how you can “definately” be among the 25 best players, but there’s “no way” he’s top 20.. so 5 spots are difference between definately and no way.. well, never mind, I’m just being petty… No matter what Drose is gonna be sick this year, can’t wait to buy league pass…

  • La Maravilla Posted: Oct.6 at 11:13 am
    Men what the hell is going on with this thing is becoming a joke u put this ni99a over Billups? Billups got denver to thw WCF men he had a way better season then this rookie men get off Drose meat he can’t shoot to save his life and don’t u ever compare him to my boy CP3 cause CP3 is in another level yeah that noe level that Drose will never reach not even with the help of stockton kid magic I don’t care who u put to coach him he can’t see CP3 at all

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.6 at 11:37 am
    minikidd:
    Yeah. 5 spots makes a difference. So you can say, for example, that Deron Williams may be a Top 10 player in the NBA but there’s no way he’s a Top 5 player. Something like that.

  • Tariq Posted: Oct.6 at 11:39 am
    Speaking of which, what the hell does Deron have to do to make the all-star team? There goes my “18th-best player is a lock” hypothesis.

  • Russ Bengtson Posted: Oct.6 at 11:43 am
    Deron has to play in a conference that doesn’t have Chris Paul, Tony Parker, Chauncey Billups, Kobe Bryant, Brandon Roy and Steve Nash in it. Either that or they need to expand the All-Star rosters to 15 players already (which they absolutely should do).

  • jsmith Posted: Oct.6 at 1:18 pm
    J-Salmons will take away most of the pressure from Rose. Deng might do something this year but you never know, and Tyrus T should still continue to improve a little bit. Rose should be a stud this year, and I think 19-8a-6r is easily attainable for Rose.

  • T.J. Posted: Oct.6 at 6:58 pm
    @minikid you know 21,22,23,24,25 but not 1-20 range and surely not over JJ

  • Harlem_World Posted: Oct.7 at 5:31 am
    If we’re talking about forthcoming season, its a better debate to ask who is better RIGHT NOW Rondo or Rose? Neither can shoot (though Rose is better shooter), but Rondo does more all over the floor than Rose right now. I’d take Rose if it was my franchise as he has the far higher ceiling, but right now? Kid’s not quite there yet. Having him placed higher than Chauncey is just nonsense. As someone else said, Devin and Grainger too.

  • Zach Posted: Oct.7 at 11:02 am
    I read alot of these comments. And I’m sick of everyone hatin on my boy D Rose. 18th spot is correct. The loss of Gordon won’t make a difference in the way this team will play. Other people will step up including Rose. He officially kknows the NBA now. He knows how to play in the league. Based on that he will put up better numbers and prove all you haters wrong. Derrick Rose will own up to the 18th if not better.

  • JD Posted: Oct.7 at 4:12 pm
    I don’t hate this guy, but 18 is 20, 22 places too high 4 him, give it a few years first, he only just edged OJ 4 R.O.Y and he’s no.40 something

  • Utah Jazz Blog Posted: Oct.8 at 4:16 pm
    Ridiculous ranking for an unproven player. Rose had a nice rookie season and probably will be deserving of this position in a year or two, but not now. No way at this point in time that he is the 18th best player in the league.

  • Darryl Posted: Oct.10 at 9:17 am
    The only GM’s that could pick up the phone and make the Bulls an offer for D.Rose Live in LA(Kobe),Cleveland(LeBron),New Orleans(CP3),Miami(D.Wade and Orlando(D.Howard),everyone else gets laughed at.That’s how good Rose is!

  • KH Posted: Oct.15 at 11:51 pm
    This is a ludicrous ranking.

  • Charles Kirk Posted: Oct.16 at 9:22 am
    I think that Rose is good but, there is noway that he is that much better than Mayo. It’s okay if you think he is but, by 29 spots no frickin way.

  • Kyle Posted: Dec.18 at 6:38 pm
    How is this guy better than Steve Nash? Wow… and Mayo and freaking Gallinari are both better than he is this season. Good call Slam! Oh, and Kobe is far better than LeBron. Nash is also better than Williams. Give him the Utah Jazz team, and he’d have 14 assists a game. The guy is making Channing Frye look like a starter in the NBA.

  • rich Posted: Apr.15 at 9:37 am
    4 1/2 months later, the ranking fits pretty perfectly. might even be higher now.. haha.. rose was just ailing with his ankle injury early in the season. he’s tearin it up now

  • Jay Posted: Apr.17 at 11:33 am
    It is safe to say that this ranking was justified with the season D.Rose just had. This is why the writers are working for SLAM mag and you people arent…

  • Jay Posted: Apr.17 at 11:35 am
    Oh I still agree that Billups is a bit underrated…

  • whitey Posted: Apr.23 at 9:41 am
    i think that he should be in the top ten

  • Jay Posted: Apr.23 at 12:34 pm
    Top ten? No way.

  • joe Posted: May.16 at 10:08 pm
    D-rose is better than jerry west

  • joe Posted: May.21 at 2:58 pm
    No way LOL…what person in there right mind would say he’s not in the top ten a d rose hated thats who problly some one who thinks nash and parker is better than rose……

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.