That’s the question Stan Van Gundy and his coaching staff had to answer as they clung to a three-point lead late in Game 4 of the NBA Finals. Van Gundy picked the wrong answer, as he elected not to foul the Lakers on the inbound play, and the rest as they say, is history.
Derek Fisher calmly dribbled up the floor, raised up for the game-tying three, and added yet another chapter to his postseason legend.
After the devastating loss, Orlando’s head coach was grilled by the assembled media, and tried to explain why he didn’t order his team to foul the Lakers in that situation. From the Orlando Sentinel:
“We thought 11 seconds was too early, especially the way we were shooting free throws,” Coach Stan Van Gundy said. “In retrospect, we gave [Fisher] too much space to shoot the ball. We played like we were trying to protect a layup. We just didn’t play Derek Fisher.”
“Yes, I regret it now [not fouling]. … That play will haunt me forever.”
Well, at least he’s self-aware. So, he’s got that going for him.
Of course, the decision not to foul is not the sole reason Orlando is now staring down a virtually insurmountable 3-1 hole…their horrendous free throw shooting (they missed 15 on the night), 19 turnovers, and defensive lapses in the closing moments played equally big roles.
- Slamadaday: Meyers Leonard on Matt Moran
- The Wisdom of Jerry Sloan
- Big East Live Blog: Quarters
- The Definitive Analysis of the Knicks Season
- The King of Rock
- Euroleague Weekly Preview
- Kevin Durant on His Love for OKC
- Knicks Losing in Depressing, Historic Fashion
- Eddie Jordan’s Hot Seat Getting Hotter
- Paul Pierce and the Celtics Hearing Boos
- Subscribe to Slamonline »
-
Thick and Thin
Deron Williams will go hard… and win.
-
Win a Ring For the King
The LeBron and Shaq show starts now!























Good chance your either sending Fisher to the line for three shots he makes more often than the pull-up-hand-in-face one he actually did make, OR you give up a 4 point play and lose the game right then and there.
Also, if Jameer meets him at the line as people are saying, Fisher could have easily moved to either side of the defender, and still been behind the three point line, with more space than he had onthe shot he made.
Basically, Fisher just made a tough, low percentage shot in a clutch moment.
Don’t regret not fouling, SVG. Regret not coaching.
JAMEER SHOULD HAVE CROWDED FISHER AT THE 3 POINT ARC.
Let’s say they do foul. The Lakers hit both freethrows. Then what? The Lakers foul too, obviously. Only problem is… The Magic were turrrible at the line last night. WHY risk missing 1 or even 2 freethrows, giving the Lakers the ball being down only 2, while STOPPING TIMEÉ
Not fouling was NOT the problem. Not crowding the 3 point line was.
Mr Nelson: I know getting blown by for a layup for DFISH may seem like an embarrassing play; but trust me — I’m pretty sure you force the guy off the line if you’re up 3 with 4 ticks left. Ugh, this is frustrating because this series should be knotted up right now and at this point, it’s all but over.
Then you’ve got the free throw contest…
The end of close games are less spectacular but it’s the best way to ensure your victory.
Maybe Ron Jeremy was on PANIC mode!
Foul him before he attempts the 3pts shoot!
What I mean is that in Europe, fouling in this case is an automatic thing, it’s almost cultural…
Players with a lil’ B-ball IQ of any age do it even without coach advice.
Maybe it’s because of the FIBA rules with so many less time outs…
Comments