Monday, November 2nd, 2009 at 3:38 pm  |  21 responses

Crossing Over

WNBA gaining widespread appeal.

by Ben YorkCrystal Langhorne

For 13 extensive years, it’s been a challenge for the WNBA to generate a substantial following; not because of a lack of talent on the basketball court, but solely due to inaccurate preconceived notions, often times incredibly biased, that the women’s game isn’t as compelling as the men’s game or worthy of true respect and attention.

And while one could become blue in the face trying to dispel those notions, it’s virtually impossible to do so unless those individuals are willing to give the “W” a genuine and fair chance.

The tides have recently taken a dramatic shift in 2009, however, and the amount of admiration and reverence for the league is at all-time high.

Clearly, the WNBA Finals series between the Phoenix Mercury and Indiana Fever contributed largely to the increase in awareness but the overall enhanced momentum has been predicated on 13 teams who continually feature an immense array of talent to showcase on the floor. Not that this is anything new for the WNBA, however, not by a long shot. The league has always been comprised of remarkable players and teams, as any long-time fan can attest to. But the 2009 season surpassed even the most lofty expectations and it’s directly correlated with (as cliché as it sounds) letting the talent on the court speak for itself.

On one hand, a case could be made about how unfortunate it is that it’s taken this long for the league to garner such a following. In the year 2009, shouldn’t we be past the point of having to fight for constant viewership of women’s athletics? Shouldn’t we have the collective notion that they are just as phenomenal (if not more at times) to watch as men? Certainly, these philosophies deal issues that run much deeper than simply playing basketball and it would be careless not to bring these up.

The fact is, though, that we have needed to claw our way toward getting the league it’s long overdue attention and, quite frankly, just to convince fans to give it a single, solitary chance. More often than not, when given an unbiased look, individuals are surprised at the talent level and thoroughly enjoy watching the ‘W.’ The beauty of this is that the WNBA has never wavered in their belief in, or support of these ladies. They’ve not once said, “I told you so” after attracting new fans to the game or developed an attitude of resentment; they’ve known all along that their product is more than worthy of public recognition and deserves to be featured in the mainstream.

That dedication and devotion to the sport is finally paying off, and it’s now closer than ever to legitimately being appreciated and valued by a vast audience.

This is unquestionably evidenced by the 2009 WNBA Finals, for instance, being the most attended Finals in league history. Over 82,000 fans attended the 5 games, an increase of 43 percent from 2008. The series also had the highest average attendance each game (16,404 fans) since the Finals went to a best-of-five format in 2005. Records were broken in postseason attendance for both the Mercury and the Fever, which featured games 3-5 as sellouts. In terms of television coverage, ESPN2 saw double-digit growth in ratings over the previous year – an average of 522,000 viewers each game, an increase of 66 percent oCappie Pondexterver 2008. These are indisputable signs that the “W” is on the brink of truly taking off.

Perhaps more important than data and numbers, it also shows a paradigm shift in public opinion. More and more “new” followers and fans of the WNBA are coming from an incredibly diverse group; this includes men who have previously not paid attention to, or written off, the league entirely. Ultimately, the constant and relentless display of supreme talent and unmatched basketball prowess made this 2009 season so magical. Game 1 of the Finals (a 120-116 Mercury overtime victory) was without question one of the best, if not the best, WNBA games of all time. Quite simply, it was just fantastic basketball showcased on a national level that subsequently served as a perfect testimonial to the authenticity of the league. Perhaps more amazing and historical, the same type of intensity and thrilling competitiveness continued throughout the entire series. Whether it was Tamika Catchings willing the Fever to a victory, or Cappie Pondexter and Diana Taurasi doing the same for Phoenix, this series exhibited a class of basketball that’s rarely been seen before.

The WNBA is now closer than ever towards gaining that type of high-level approval and endorsement, and the 2009 season has proven they are on an indelible track en route to the status they’ve fought so long, and honorably, to attain.

All signs point to an incredibly bright future for a league whose props are long overdue.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • Big M

    Shouldn’t the fact that there has been no Team USA Men’s Basketball this summer (for the first time in awhile) that may have led to the large percentage increases? Either way, if it helps, its a good thing.

  • http://slamonline.com YKnot

    It’s about time the “w” gets some props! I’ve been a fan since Penny Toller started doing and1 tricks during games in her stint with the Sparks!

  • Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  • http://www.iluvwnba.com/blogspot.com sweetd

    Thanks for the article. The WNBA finally getting it just due. The girls are really getting better on every level. The next step will be women above the rim. Once that happen I don’t know what the haters are going to be able to say.

    http://www.sexywomenofbasketball.blogspot.com

  • BurnBrother

    Seems you conveniently failed to mention that for most of the finals games the “GMs” of the respective organizations, Steve Kerr and Larry Bird “bought out” all of the available tickets to assure there was the appearance of interest in this series.

    This is just more of David Stern’s blind devotion to subsidizing the WNBA. Hopefully he will retire eventually and we’ll see if the WNBA can actually stand on it’s own. Right now we know it losses millions of dollars per year for the NBA and it’s Franchisees.

    I’d love to know who actually paid for those “free” playoff tickets and the nature of the conversations with the owners of the continually money losing WNBA franchisees with the real money people.

    I’m all for the WNBA, but it needs to stand on it’s own. It shouldn’t be another extension of Title IX into pro sports. If it’s such a great thing for women THEY need to step up and support it.

    A bit more objectivity would be appropriate.

  • Kiera Press

    It’s about time i love the wnba!!!!

  • Bailee

    Women are above the rim!!! I love the WNBA!! and there are a handfull of women in the W that can dunk or a very close to dunking!!!! Slam should put a women on there cover!! I mean ESPN did and the women was pregnent!!! thats a mile stone right there!!! Taking a Mans Magazine that women like too and put a women on the cover and more NCAA and Pro Women stuff on the inside!!!!!!!!

  • Karen

    Larry Bird only bought out the upper seats for the Conference Finals of the Indiana Fever against the Detroit Shock because he felt “these ladies deserve our support”. Those 6,000 tickets were gone in less than an hour. The 18,000+ FANS bought out Conseco Field House for games 3 & 4 of the Finals. A bit more of getting the facts correct would be appropriate.

  • SportsNut

    Is this a joke? The WNBA certainly is. Thirteen years – attendance shrinking, team count shrinking, rosters shrinking, TV ratings miniscule, only afloat thanks to NBA subsidy. Ben York just states his opinion that support has been tepid not because of a lack of talent on the court but solely (solely!) due to inaccurate preconceived notions, etc. Really? Maybe people just don’t care for it, ever think of that? Does anyone honestly think the best team in the WNBA could beat a strong boys high school team?

  • http://www.slamonline.com Ben York

    @SportsNut – Thank you for taking the time to read an entire lengthy article regarding a league you don’t care about.

  • SunnyDelight

    SportsNut,
    Have you ever watch an WNBA game or attended one in person? Have you ever watched a practiced or stepped on a court to shoot around with any of the WNBA’s talented players. These ladies can ball and could hold their own against some professional men let alone high school teams.

    Here’s an idea for you, if you don’t like it don’t watch it and better yet don’t troll on a WNBA blog to spread hatred for these hard working, talented basketball players. The WNBA is turning a corner whether you or anyone else wants to admit it.

  • caune

    Oh sportsnut, you must be nuts to be here reading an article about things you could care less about. sure sign of insanity I’d say.

  • Jazzy

    Great article Ben! I love that the WNBA is finally starting to get the respect that it deserves. These ladies are extremely talented and it’s always so fun to watch them play. I’ve brought friends who claim they “hate/dislike” basketball (any kind of basketball) to WNBA games and by the end of the game they don’t even want to leave because they enjoyed it so much. They have even asked me if they can come to another game :) ! I’m not going to even entertain that question about the WNBA vs high school boys teams. Anyone who has seen these ladies play knows the answer. Go WNBA! Can’t wait for next season.

  • nano

    Kudos Mr. York. Well said, spot on. Love reading your articles. Keep up the great work.

  • DaniBHaveq

    Love the game, love the league, love the passion. Glad The W finally has a place with SLAM.
    Keep it up Ben, thanks for spreading the word.

    …oh, and thanks for reading, Sportsnut. Adding page traffic.

  • emibaby

    Ahhh, I love it. The smell of crazy in the morning! SportsNut read an article on something he doesn’t support, brews up negativity like we don’t have enough of that already, and then bothers himself to write a comment about an article on a topic of which he isn’t a fan.

    I agree that women need to take care of the league. The most important thing you need to remember, boys, is Oprah. Oprah took charge of TV and is now one of the richest, most widely-respected PEOPLE in the world (not just women). And she’s just ONE woman! Imagine what the rest of us could do together! Be afraid. Be very afraid! ;-)

  • SportsNut

    So, the comment board is only for those agreeing with the article’s thesis? Someone needs to tell me these things. This is such an over the top love fest for the WNBA that it can’t be taken seriously. I would hope Ben was paid for such an obvious advertisement. If you like the WNBA, that’s fine, but to conclude that those not liking it are sexist, etc, that if they were only enlightened they would embrace the league, is laughable. It’s been shown through the public’s viewing habits and entertainment spending choices that the WNBA just doesn’t stand up as a pro league.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Ben York

    @SportsNut – I won’t continue to banter back and forth. It’s not that you don’t care for the league; that is absolutely your choice. However, calling it a “joke” is a bit much and is a perfect example of what I talk about in the article. In addition, the reasons you use to back up your statements are false. The WNBA finished the 2009 regular season with a third consecutive year of increased attendance and a second straight season of increased viewership on ESPN2. For the 2009 Finals, average viewership on ESPN2 jumped 76 percent from a year ago. The five-game series also featured three sellouts plus the highest total attendance figure (82,018) in WNBA Finals history.

  • SportsNut

    Uh dude – a 76% increase over nothing is still almost nothing. Three sellouts in the finals – thanks to the Larry Birds of the world buying blocks of tickets – doesn’t say much. Attendance is still way off the peaks of about ten years ago. Teams were getting bumped out of their home arenas during the playoffs for scheduling conflicts over things like kids shows (think that would happen to the Lakers?). If your job is to write propaganda for the league, that’s one thing. But if you ever want to be taken seriously, get off the soap box and do a little work. Check some facts, do some analysis. The WNBA just isn’t a league very many people care about. It’s vastly inferior to mens basketball, and doesn’t generate enough interest to be a self sustaining pro league. A five year ramp up is one thing, but 13 years? Give it up already.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Ben York

    @SportsNut – It’s fine that you don’t like it. Really, it is. I think where I’m coming from is that I just have never understood the intense ferocity that people have who aren’t fans. You seem to vehemently have a strong passion for disliking it. I’m not a big hockey fan/follower but I certainly respect and admire what they do.

  • Greg

    Sportsnut is spot on. York is another apologist for a failed,PC,ideological experiment. TV ratings and attendance have no political agenda. York wrote an article saying we,the fan needs to change. How many failed businesses would claim the consumer is wrong and that’s why they went out of business. I’m sure the stockholders would accept that logic. The WNBA is badly played, poorly executed basketball.That’s why no one cares or watches. Don’t tell me because I don’t watch it I’m sexist. I loathe hockey,that doesn’t mean I hate Canadians. I prefer a filet over sliders. That doesn’t mean I’m threatened by beef. It is insulting to try to sell me that the WNBA is a good product. I wouldn’t have gone to any of those games even if Larry and Steve gave me the ticket. The WNBA is to fundamental basketball as the Special Olympics is to the Olympics.

Advertisement
Counterkicks
Fullcourt.com