Monday, December 28th, 2009 at 8:42 pm  |  23 responses

President Orender Reflects on the Decade

Grateful for WNBA progress, inspired for the future.

by Ben York

There is an infectious optimism that exudes from WNBA President, Donna Orender, at all times.

Side effects of spending time with her include feeling encouraged, gaining a sense of reassurance, and becoming energized for things to come. Her love of basketball is indelible, her ambition unwavering. Not surprisingly, Orender’s leadership and experience is precisely what the WNBA needs to truly thrive.

The WNBA, as an organization, has endured a plethora of change over the decade. Teams have been dispersed while others have been created. The amount of parity in the league has increased dramatically. And despite several roadblocks that impacted the WNBA over the past few years, largely due to the stagnant economy, Orender remains steadfast in her devotion towards advancing the WNBA.

Taking over for Val Ackerman in 2005, Orender brought a business-savvy approach to the WNBA, combined with a personal passion for the game, that translated into immediate commercial success. In 2007, Orender helped sDonna Orender & Diana Taurasitructure an unprecedented television deal for a women’s professional sports league worth millions of dollars to the WNBA beginning in 2009.

The eight-year deal with ESPN would provide television coverage for the WNBA through the year 2016 with profits being dispersed among each active team. Not coincidentally, 2009 saw record-setting television ratings with the spectacular playoffs and finals leading to an 83 percent increase in male viewership, a 62 percent increase in female viewership, and an astounding 280 percent increase in viewers ages 12-17.

“The 2009 season, in terms of fulfilling what the league could be, was incredibly validating,” said Orender. She’s absolutely correct; the decade was capped in the best possible way for the league. Not only did it feature phenomenal talent all around, it created a distinct momentum heading into a new decade as evidenced by the surge in television ratings and in-game attendance. During the 2009 WNBA playoffs, average attendance increased 18.5 percent from 2008 which led to the highest-attended WNBA Finals ever with 82,018 people catching the game in person.

Orender’s use of the word “validating” also couldn’t be more accurate. Just three years earlier in 2006, the WNBA entered its 10th-consecutive season becoming the first team-oriented professional women’s sports organization to do so. Although several teams have ceased operations and many others have changed locations throughout its 13-year existence, there is now an indelible sense of hope for the future.

Orender has maintained a constant mantra of patience and exuberance for the league during her tenure that is becoming increasingly influential. Though Orender wasn’t comfortable saying 2009 was a turning point for the league, she did acknowledge the significance of the season. “I don’t know if it’s a turning point; I think it’s an inflection point,” Orender said. “I think what [2009] does do is it takes the positive trends we’ve been seeing the last couple of years and continues them with an exclamation point.”

From a numbers perspective, the WNBA has seen positive signs over the past several years that fueled the tremendous season in 2009. Perhaps more important was the sheer influx of talent that filtered into the league toward the latter half of the decade. Orender believes the accumulation of talent directly correlates with recent prosperity. “We’re seeing the impact in attendance growth, we’re seeing it in viewership growth, we’re seeing it in ratings growth; but if you really want to see the impact of the WNBA we need to look at the growth in talent,” Orender said. “It took the WNBA to come along and put the spotlight on women’s basketball and you now see growth in programs at the youth level all the way through. We’re all now beginning to benefit from all the seeds being planted. We’re just at the beginning of what those benefits are going to be.”

Providing this goal to young women everywhere is, conceivably, the WNBA’s greatest accomplishment to date; and essential towards the future success of the league. Without generating excitement at the youth level, the continuing dream of the WNBA would surely wither away. Orender has made a conscious effort to promote the league to its younger audience not just with the goal in mind to be a professional athlete, but to inspire confidence and self-worth.

“I was lucky enough to be in a reception in Atlanta recently, and I can’t tell you how many young players were there; and I’m talking about young — 10, 11, 12 years old,” said Orender. “They were with their Dads, their Moms, their coaches and they would tell me ‘this player is coming to you’ or ‘that team is coming to you’. It’s just fantastic! To be able tDonna Orender & Angel McCoughtryo set a really admirable goal, to be able to project achievement, to be able to project success and what it takes to get there — it takes hard work and commitment; all of us need to learn what it takes to be successful in this world. So whether they make the WNBA or not, what they are learning is how to be successful in life. I think that’s incredibly important, way beyond making a WNBA team.”

In order to sustain and enhance this tangible level of ambition, it’s imperative that young women have someone to look up to — someone to admirably idolize and associate themselves with. The NBA had its Magic Johnsons, its Larry Birds, and its Michael Jordans that it used to appeal to the younger generation; thus, creating fans and supporters of the league for life. Having these popular, larger-than-life superstars over the past 10 years has given youth something to achieve and strive for.

Similarly, the WNBA has seen a return on its investment of marketable stars such as Candace Parker, Becky Hammon, and Diana Taurasi. For the WNBA, the use of these players and the league in general is key to building a bridge into the mainstream. “I think it has to do with one, they are very visible role models — they are visions for girls to compete and get sweaty, dirty, and compete on teams,” Orender said. “The WNBA gives everybody a green light for that. Secondly, because there is that spotlight it has just elevated the amount of resources dedicated to these young girls. There is now gym time when there wasn’t gym time before. There is a quality of coaching that wasn’t there before. When I played, maybe I was one in a couple thousand. Now, I’d be one out of a million.”

The WNBA has always featured a level of accessibility to fans that is unmatched in other professional sports organizations. Players make a continual effort to interact with fans of all ages and make them feel a vital part towards their success — at all times. The past decade has also offered fans unprecedented access toward their favorite teams with the newly created WNBA LiveAccess feature where fans can watch the majority of games online.

But the growth of the league deals with more than just basketball — it’s about setting an example of achievement and empowerment. The standard the WNBA sets for today’s youth transcends gender lines. Though Orender believes in the importance of giving back, she certainly didn’t have to do much convincing to encourage players to feel the same way. “A little known story of when I first got this job is that I wanted to meet the players to learn a little about them and what was important to them — and I fully expected they would ask about business issues,” Orender said. “But every woman asked about how I could help them give back more or help the league give back more. I was pleasantly surprised by that.”

“The desire to give back is authentically part of who these women are,” Orender said. “It’s not a conscious desire to be good people — we are good people. So it’s naturally a part of their lives everyday. The brand in and of itself is an iconic brand. It’s a brand that represents diversity and achievement. When you live these beliefs it becomes very natural to give back and adds so much meaning to our lives.”

Looking back over the last 10 years, it’s easy for the detractors to look at the negative publicity the WNBA has had to face and come to a consensus that the future is bleak. However, the sheer amount of progress the league has made, especially in the 5 years since Orender took over, should trump some of the more unfortunate circumstances.

“We really have to stop and remind ourselves where we are in our history and how far we’ve come,” Orender said. “Business is not patient, people by nature are not patient — it’s a ’show me now, what did you do for me yesterday’ world we live in. So, that’s why we have such an incredible group of owners. They believe we are making our own future and are doing it at a faster pace than anybody could have imagined. If you look at the track records of other leagues, we have surpassed what it took the NBA to get to in 30 years. That said, it’s a different world and we have to keep making progress.”

Although Orender is excited about how far the league has come, contentment certainly isn’t in her vocabulary. She is fully aware that both the success and progress the league has made recently could dissipate in a heartbeat. The desire and drive Orender has to advance the league is palpable, her passion encouraging. There is a genuine ‘fan’ in Orender that comes directly from her playing days at Queens College and in the WBL. Hence, she is personally invested in the future of women’s basketball and believes in its importance and future.

“I absolutely love the game,” said Orender. “I love being around the game and I love our athletes that have played this game. Everyday when I wake up and and be connected to that I find it exciting and gratifying. And I have to tell you, I love the fans and supporters of the WNBA – that’s what gets me up everyday.”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags:

  • BK Posted: Dec.29 at 12:27 am
    how did this dude get a job at SLAM?

  • DS44 Posted: Dec.29 at 10:12 am
    try getting more games televised!

  • AV Posted: Dec.29 at 12:55 pm
    I just started watching the WNBA and I have to say that they are full of passion. They play hard and deserve credit for what they have done for womens sports. Great article Ben! Keep up the good coverage on the WNBA.

  • Ace Posted: Dec.29 at 4:40 pm
    I do have to give the woman credit for getting the WNBA more exposure. Lets hope the WNBA continue to grows through the years. With the talent coming out of college now and highschool the future looks bright.

  • Ben York Posted: Dec.29 at 4:56 pm
    @AV,@Ace: Thank you for reading and for commenting. She really has the WNBA heading in a great direction and I certainly hope the success continues.

  • Chris Posted: Dec.29 at 6:44 pm
    Donna is a very hard-working, very intelligent lady, but she’s in a catch-22. Her biggest issue is her hardest-core fans. Right now, the WNBA is that crazy lady in the office nobody likes. The one who’s not attractive but has a nasty attitude. She’s ignored by most guys, but when one says something nice to her, she complains about sexual harassment and tell everyone she can’t get him to stop hitting on her. Of course, this causes the guys to become hostile toward her and other women to be repeled from her. Problem isn’t just that no one likes the player of the “victim” card. It also detracts from real victims of sexual harassment, because when that happens, people see this woman’s antics and associate them with the real victims. This woman is the WNBA and the real victim is women’s sports and womankind. The WNBA’s product (attractiveness) is subpar, but unlike other women’s sports, the fans won’t let let the WNBA differentiate itself from the men’s version (i.e. uniforms, rim height, etc.) yet they expect the same respect as the NBA (the more attractive girl at the office). Other women’s sports make differentiations (i.e. tennis skirts, shorter fences in softball, shorter nets in volleyball, tees in golf, etc.) Then the WNBA fans play the victim card by accusing those not attracted to (watching) the WNBA as “haters” and misogynists and other names, when in reality, most of those who “hate” the WNBA have no problems with women, women’s sports or women’s basketball, just the WNBA. Of course, the victim card repels men and women, and because the WNBA is the top women’s b-ball league, all of women’s sports takes a step backwards. So Donna’s problem becomes: Is she going to appeal to the masses (change the uniforms, lower the rim, change some other rules, etc.) and alienate the most loyal fans and gamble there is enough interest from the masses to sustain the WNBA? Or is she going to continue to repel the masses (and maintain the WNBA’s status as one of the biggest jokes in sports) and hope the most loyal fans can sustain the league? The latter seems to be what she’s doing, and it doesn’t seem to be working.

  • Chris Posted: Dec.29 at 6:44 pm
    Donna is a very hard-working, very intelligent lady, but she’s in a catch-22. Her biggest issue is her hardest-core fans. Right now, the WNBA is that crazy lady in the office nobody likes. The one who’s not attractive but has a nasty attitude. She’s ignored by most guys, but when one says something nice to her, she complains about sexual harassment and tells everyone she can’t get him to stop hitting on her. Of course, this causes the guys to become hostile toward her and other women to be repeled from her. Problem isn’t just that no one likes the player of the “victim” card. It also detracts from real victims of sexual harassment, because when that happens, people see this woman’s antics and associate them with the real victims. This woman is the WNBA and the real victim is women’s sports and womankind. The WNBA’s product (attractiveness) is subpar, but unlike other women’s sports, the fans won’t let let the WNBA differentiate itself from the men’s version (i.e. uniforms, rim height, etc.) yet they expect the same respect as the NBA (the more attractive girl at the office). Other women’s sports make differentiations (i.e. tennis skirts, shorter fences in softball, shorter nets in volleyball, tees in golf, etc.) Then the WNBA fans play the victim card by accusing those not attracted to (watching) the WNBA as “haters” and misogynists and other names, when in reality, most of those who “hate” the WNBA have no problems with women, women’s sports or women’s basketball, just the WNBA. Of course, the victim card repels men and women, and because the WNBA is the top women’s b-ball league, all of women’s sports takes a step backwards. So Donna’s problem becomes: Is she going to appeal to the masses (change the uniforms, lower the rim, change some other rules, etc.) and alienate the most loyal fans and gamble there is enough interest from the masses to sustain the WNBA? Or is she going to continue to repel the masses (and maintain the WNBA’s status as one of the biggest jokes in sports) and hope the most loyal fans can sustain the league? The latter seems to be what she’s doing, and it doesn’t seem to be working.

  • Chris Posted: Dec.29 at 6:45 pm
    Oops, sorry for the double-post.

  • Ace Posted: Dec.30 at 1:45 am
    @Chris making those changes does not guarantee mass appeal. If she sticks with it and with the new talent coming in, the WNBA will continue to grow. Personally if I was staff for the WNBA and you told me this rubbish I would just say “don’t watch it then, problem solved.” If history has taught us anything it’s that trying to appeal to the masses is not always the right answer. Rome tried it by getting rid of the citizen-soilder, and it backfired. They also tried with the coliseum, except it caused them to go broke by trying to please the masses.

  • Clay Kallam Posted: Dec.30 at 11:40 am
    I think the characterization of the WNBA has some validity, but I don’t know that it’s one of the biggest jokes in sports. It is basketball played at a high level by elite athletes, regardless of how it may come across as a victim. I agree the league should tone down the “Expect Great” angle and promote itself more realistically, but in the long run, the league, as with all second-tier sports, will rise and fall with the development and nurture of its core audience.

  • hoopla Posted: Dec.30 at 7:04 pm
    @Chris: I agree with most of what you are saying…and your analogy was a good one. I don’t agree with your solutions though. Changing the uniforms, lowering the rims, etc is not the answer. The WNBA, it’s fans and it’s writers definitely need to “stop playing the victim” as you put it. Stop being so darn sensitive. Stop taking themselves and the league so darn seriously. Stop trying so hard to confront and convert the haters. That is a HUUUUGE turnoff for me…and I’m a big fan of the WNBA! Just cover the league in a REALISTIC, BALANCED and INTELLIGENT manner without being confrontational and judgmental of other leagues and fans of other leagues. Focus on talking/writing about the league as if it is a serious, respectable sports entity. If you take yourself seriously, it increases the likelihood that others will too. That means stop preaching. Stop begging for acceptance. If the WNBA loyalists aren’t willing to critique and criticize the league, then they leave that completely up to the haters. Clearly that hasn’t served us well thus far. Anyway, nice article, Ben. Donna’s unwavering optimism is refreshing :-)

  • Chris Posted: Dec.31 at 4:40 am
    @Ace: Problem is, even with more and more talent coming in, the WNBA is NOT growing. In fact, it’s contracting. Actual attendance is shrinking and unlike the NBA and MLB (which also saw attendance declines amid this economic climate) there is NOT a significant increase in TV ratings to counter. TV, media coverage, attendance and popular conscious have all declined drastically since Day One. If you don’t appeal to the masses, you’re going to fail. And to be honest, I won’t be sad at all if the WNBA fails. I hope it does. Then, maybe by the time my daughters get to middle school, someone else will come up with another pro women’s basketball league with a better and more realistic business model and a marketing scheme catering to the mainstream fanbase instead of the current core fanbase that seems incredibly hostile toward the mainstream leagues and fans. I want women’s pro hoops to succeed, but the current WNBA is laughed at (pitied, really) by most men and repulsive to most women. I’m sure you’ve notice that modern feminists have NOT jumped on the WNBA bandwagon. They disassociate themselves from the WNBA, because the WNBA is that credibility-lacking crazy woman at the office whose antics are ultimately hurting the real victim, i.e. women’s sports. (And comparing a modern entertainment-based sports league to ancient Roman politics? Come on, bro.) And you’re comment about
    “Don’t watch it” – that’s what the majority of the population is doing, which is why the league is regressing.

  • Chris Posted: Dec.31 at 4:56 am
    @Clay Kallam: I think the WNBA is considered a joke by much of the sports world, but it’s not because of the athletes. Also, I don’t mind the “expect great” angle, and I think the WNBA has promoted itself realistically. And the problem with the WNBA core fanbase (as opposed to the fanbase of other niche leagues) is that their general behavior repels mainstream and casual fans away. The incessant bashing of the NBA, NFL and MLB gets people upset and the unbelievable defensiveness when someone mentions that women are not as good as men is over-the-top. (I’ve talked about this before, but in short, mainstreamers don’t take well to WNBA loyalists saying stuff like the NBA is “all about dunking” or “don’t play defense” or “don’t hustle” or “lack fundamentals and teamwork” or “is 1-on-5″ or “are all thugs”, and saying that in such an in-your-face way.) I think women’s hoops ought to cater to the mainstreamers (as opposed to the current core fanbase) because unlike the other niche leagues, it has the potential to be big-time. Americans love basketball and women. It would help a lot if they look like women on the court (and I don’t mean bikinis, but tighter tanktops and shorter shorts like what tennis players wear when they’re practicing). Lower the rim, so they can play above the rim. It’s not demeaning to women, it just means they are shorter. It’s not any more demeaning to shorter nets in volleyball, fences in softball, tees in golf, etc. There shouldn’t be so many blown uncontested lay-ups, but we see them because players are releasing the ball so far below the basket.

  • Chris Posted: Dec.31 at 5:10 am
    @hoopla: I’m far more passionate about changing the uniforms than lowering the rim. I think changing the uniforms is a solution, because it’s one of the first things people see, and perception is reality in people’s minds. The perception is, the women want to be men because they’re dressing like men. In no other aspect of sports or life in general do women dress exactly like men – not in tennis, volleyball, golf, schools, gyms, business offices, formal dances, bars and clubs, etc. Except basketball. And I think that turns people off. Lots of WNBA loyalists say changing the uniforms means they’re selling sex and devaluing the athleticism. I disagree. Are you saying the athleticism of women’s tennis players, golfers, softball players, figure skaters, etc. has been devalued because they look feminine? Personally, as the father of two softball and soccer playing daughters, I take offense to that. I want them to think it’s okay to be a woman and an athlete, which means looking like a woman athlete. WNBA fanbase seems to think it’s not okay to look like a woman because they devalues their athleticism. Changing the uniforms would change to perception from “We’re just like the men (but we can’t play like them)” to “We’re women and we’re basketball players, and that’s something to be proud of.” Think of how the perceptions of women’s tennis and volleyball players and figure skaters would change if they suddenly dressed like the males athletes do. That’s the WNBA right now. As for everything else you said, I wish more WNBA fans would take note. And PS, nice blog!

  • hoopla Posted: Dec.31 at 1:14 pm
    @Chris: hmmm…I hear what you’re saying and I understand your approach. I personally have a hard time advocating “form-fitting” bball uniforms because I know darn well I wouldn’t want to play in them. I grew up playing volleyball, tennis and basketball in high school and, while I loved the sports, I loathed the tennis skirt and the volleyball spandex. Aren’t women’s soccer uniforms very similar to their male counterparts? Is that a problem too? Also, IMO, baseball uniforms are actually more “feminine” than softball unis because baseball pants are really tight. In softball, the ladies are wearing baggy shorts just like the female ballers. Is the issue simply that you want the WNBA uniforms to be different than the men but not necessarily more feminine? Like, would it be cool if the WNBA unis remained baggy, but the women wore t-shirts instead of tanks (…a la softball uniforms)? Or long pants instead of shorts? How about if the uniforms stayed the same, but the colors were more feminine — more pink/purple and less blue? Honestly, I don’t think a uniform re-design would help the league at all. It’s not like people are watching softball, gymnastics or figure skating more than they are watching the WNBA. Sure, women’s tennis and golf are probably more popular than the WNBA, but those are non-contact sports. Actually, every sport you mentioned above is non-contact. It’s easy to look feminine, prissy and dainty while golfing but it’s impossible to do that while playing bball regardless as to what the athletes on the court are wearing. So unless you want to change the rules of women’s basketball so that it becomes a non-contact sport (with no sweating or aggression), then I think its kind of impossible for your vision to come to fruition…Good discussion though :-)

  • Ace Posted: Dec.31 at 11:43 pm
    @Chris why not compare it to politics b/c that’s all business is anyways, politics. My comparison to Rome goes deeper than just politics. I have studied the history of Rome and the comparison works. It’s clear we hang in diff. circles b/c the men and women I hang with actually enjoy watching the WNBA. You can even ask the players they know that the WNBA is not popular, but they know what it means to young girls to see them play. Personally I would market to the gay men and women b/c even if that’s the majority of your viewers you can still do very well. I hope the WNBA teams continue to have sponsors like Phoenix and LA b/c that’s how the teams in Europe do and they can pay their athletes way more. I’m guessing you didn’t look at the attendance records or viewing records that they broke this year? To even hope the WNBA fails makes you a hater, it’s ok to not like the WNBA but to wish it fails is crazy. I don’t like baseball but I don’t want the MLB to fail. If it fails are you gonna start a new league to replace it, and find all of those people jobs?

  • Chris Posted: Jan.2 at 2:22 pm
    @Hoopla: Just wondering, why do you loathe the tennis skirt and volleyball spandex. Personally, I think the volleyball spandex is too “slutty” and I can’t believe they have high school girls wear them. However, it is the female coaches who insist volleyball uniforms stay like that. As for soccer, the uniforms are the same — however, since when, in America, has soccer been considered a masculine sports? Never. And baseball (and football) — yes the guys play in tight pants. Do you honestly not think that is at least part of the reason why baseball and football are so popular with women? I know many genuine female sports fans (including my wife), but I know just as many who watch baseball and football just to stare at the guys (and my wife admits she does that, too). Is it that wrong that the WNBA also makes “sex” at least part of the package, the way MLB and NFL does rather shamelessly? (And it doesn’t matter what colors they are, baggy jerseys and knee-length shorts are not feminine. I think the WNBA should enforce a rule that shorts cannot go past mid-thighs.)

  • Chris Posted: Jan.2 at 2:35 pm
    @Ace: Okay, my bad. Those comments about wishing the WNBA to fold go too far. I don’t actually wish that. I do, however, wish the current culture of the WNBA goes good-bye. The WNBA fans try to say the WNBA stands for social and feminist progress. However, in reality, it is social and feminist regress. Too much of the fanbase are man-hating (which means, among other things, NBA-hating) radicals. The feminist movement has disassociated with the WNBA. Men have, too. I like to see a WNBA with a model that appeals to the mainstream and not the radicals. This is a country that loves basketball and loves women. The WNBA (and, again, when I say WNBA, I don’t mean women’s basketball) is repulsive. And then the fans say this country hates women and women’s basketball, but that’s not the case (hence my victim card analogy). This country hates the WNBA, but not the sport of women’s basketball. Another women’s basketball league run differently could easily be loved by the masses and become highly profitable, which would make women’s basketball mainstream. But women’s basketball will never be mainstream as long as the WNBA as it is right now has a monopoly on the sport. That’s all I meant. (PS Those attendance “records” are beyond bogus and the TV ratings increase is the equivalent of raising your grade from a D- to a D+ in the recent semester of your senior year after starting out with B’s and A’s in your first year.)

  • Ace Posted: Jan.2 at 10:29 pm
    @Chris. The only time I really had a prob with some WNBA was when they were hating on the press that Candace Parker was getting (b/c she was great ball player, attractive, and straight.) Aside from that I haven’t really seen or talked to these man-hating fans you speak of (i’m sure some exist.) Even if you think it’s only a minor grade improvement a D+ is still passing. I think the WNBA needs to get more private investors so they can get more teams away from the NBA and make some changes (longer season, bigger salary, better promotion, etc, etc.) We can agree that the WNBA needs to make some changes. We may disagree on what those changes are, but changes nonetheless.

  • Greg Posted: Jan.3 at 11:24 pm
    The WNBA’s problem is not that they don’t dunk. It’s that they don’t play the game very well. One improvement would be to shorten the length of the court. There is too much dead space with the current playing surface size. There will still be the issues of athleticism. Please don’t tell me they are great athletes. Frankly they play like girls and that’s why no one watches. Sorry “Gloria Steinem’s” but women are inferior athletically. If you don’t believe me look at the Guiness World Record Book. Men run faster,jump higher,are physically stronger,and are all around better athletically. Don’t try to sell me that it is just as good,it isn’t.

  • Chris Posted: Jan.3 at 11:51 pm
    @Ace: D+ is a passing grade, but women’s hoops has the potential to get A’s and B’s. Sure it’d be nice if the WNBA played longer seasons, paid bigger salaries, had better promotions, but with what money? The league is already bleeding cash and would be long gone if not for the parents (NBA). If you don’t see the man-hating WNBA fans, I’m don’t know what you’re seeing. WNBA fans hate the press on CP because they think her attractiveness, etc. is pandering the men. They are so passionate about not changing uniforms to something feminine because they think it would be pandering to men (even though the ever-popular NFL and MLB blatantly sell sex to women, as well as football and baseball to its core fans). If WNBA fans are not man-hating, why are are they so quick to bash the NBA, MLB and NFL – stereotyping them all as dumb thugs, etc. When they say garbage like the NBA is all dunking or one-on-one or no defense or no fundamentals, that’s not being objective, it’s hating on the NBA because they are men. (I don’t mind them propping up the WNBA, but don’t use lies like WNBA is so fundamental or defense-oriented or play so hard when compared to the NBA. Our author Ben is very guilty of this.) When WNBA fans are so quick to label people who don’t watch the WNBA, that’s man-hating. Never mind that someone may simply not watch the WNBA because it’s not a high enough level (that’s not my reason, but many of my non-sexist guy friends state that reason), they are misogynistics and insecure about themselves. Never mind someone may spend thousands to pay for their daughters’ private softball lessons or take them to pro women’s soccer games or one of Hillary Clinton’s rallies or move 500 miles for your wife’s career, etc. (all of which I did), you don’t watch the WNBA, you’re a sexist hater who doesn’t appreciate “real” basketball. When WNBA fans criticize women for watching the NBA but not the WNBA, that’s also man-hating. My wife was a women’s studies minor back at Cal. She and her friends from that circle are true feminists (people who desire equality for women, not everything for women). They laugh at the WNBA. They won’t associate or support the WNBA because it doesn’t stand for their mission. When I refer to WNBA fans as “radicals,” that’s actually my wife’s word. I worked concessions at Arco way back in college 10 years ago, and I remember seeing the general attitude toward men of most WNBA fans. I remember thinking back then that as long as they dominate the fan voice, the WNBA will never be mainstream.

  • Chris Posted: Jan.3 at 11:57 pm
    @Hoopla: One more thing — I don’t know why people don’t watch softball more. Sure, they don’t have the athleticism or power or speed as the MLB guys, but I honestly don’t understand why there is such a big difference in popularity. But gymnastics is one of the most popular sports of the summer Olympics and figure skating is far and away the most popular and profitable women’s sport, so I don’t know what you mean by no one watches them.

  • Kevin Yost Posted: Jan.4 at 2:05 pm
    I like women’s basketball, figure skating, ice hockey, field hockey, lacrosse, softball, tennis, and volleyball. I like the idea of women having more feminine uniforms in basketball, like those in Australia, as well as in soccer, just as the FIFA president suggested, and just as female indoor volleyball players went to more feminine uniforms. However, the WNBA just changed uniforms and they are more feminine than the ones before. I hope that WNBA, WPS, and National Pro Fastpitch expand and continue to thrive. I would also like to see more WNBA games on television again, especially on regular television, since I do not have cable, satellite, or internet access at home.

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.
Fullcourt.com