Monday, May 17th, 2010 at 1:11 pm  |  8 responses

The WNBA’s Back

Random notes from the first weekend of WNBA ball.

by Clay Kallam

What we learned from the first weekend …

Well, not that much, really, but there were a couple of nuggets. And to say it doesn’t really matter because it’s early misses one crucial factor: Head-to-head tiebreakers.

In a WNBA season that promises to be more balanced and competitive than any of the previous 13, not only is it likely that head-to-head results will determine home court advantage in postseason, but could very possibly determine who makes the playoffs and who doesn’t.

With that in mind, Indiana’s two losses to division rivals is certainly not good news for Fever fans, nor are L.A.’s two defeats at the hands of Phoenix and Seattle. Of course, things are going to be easier in the West because of …

Tulsa: The Shock don’t have much talent, but Nolan Richardson’s vaunted system isn’t going to make that talent any better. Richardson’s brand of pressure defense requires a deep roster that doesn’t feature too many stars and can get production from the ninth player on the bench. It also works a lot better at lower levels where inexperienced ballhandlers are more likely to panic facing double-teams.

To start with the first point, does it make any sense to play Natasha Lacy eight minutes more than Plenette Pierson? Or Scholanda Robinson 11 more minutes than Shavonte Zellous? And since Tulsa’s success is far more dependent on Pierson and Zellous than on Lacy and Robinson, what has Richardson gained by showing the women who he must have on his side that he won’t stick with them?

And yes, the Shock forced 22 turnovers, but that was against a team without its best player, and its third-best player, both of whom would have punished over-aggressive defense a lot more than Nuria Martinez and Monica Wright could.

Marion Jones? Please. Promotional gimmicks are great, but how many tickets will she sell if the team loses and she plays 3:19 a night?

New York: Cappie Pondexter is going to do just fine, but the Liberty are going to have to defend a lot better to be a force in the East. Defense was an obvious weakness coming into the season, but of course if Kalana Greene and Essence Carson keep shooting close to 50 percent, it won’t matter that much.

And my long-time criticisms of Anne Donovan and Kia Vaughn may have to be revised: Donovan, or someone, seems to have gotten to Vaughn and made her realize she has a ton of talent in a great basketball body. Then again, Vaughn didn’t get to the free throw line in 12 minutes, and for her to take the next step, she has to figure out a way to draw fouls.

Chicago: “Fouls” made me think of “Fowles”, and hoo boy, Sylvia Fowles looks a lot better. A whole lot better.

She actually has moves now, and plays with confidence and passion. And she’s no longer a turnover machine, and apparently has learned to catch the ball, which means she’s pretty much unstoppable.

To maximize her value, though, the Sky need their starting guards to make shots, and Dominique Canty and Jia Perkins combined to go six for 19 against New York. If they make two more jumpers, Chicago wins–and Fowles is more wide open.

Phoenix: Losing Cappie hurts, as the Mercury no longer have anyone to give the ball to in crunch time, confident that a good shot will be created for someone. Still, the addition of Candice Dupree is a good one, as even though she provided only token defense on Candace Parker, she put up the first of many double-doubles in the one-point win over L.A.

Also, credit to Corey Gaines for a nifty sideline inbounds play to set up the winning free throws. (I’m stealing that one for my high school team, and I’m sure I’m not the only one.) People will forget the play in a week or so, but when we get to August, and the head-to-head between Phoenix and L.A. becomes a topic of discussion, it might be worth recalling.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Ace

    Tulsa: I agree with everything you said.
    NY: Didn’t get to see them play. I do know that Donovan is a good coach which is a plus for NY.
    Chicago: Agree if they don’t get their shooters to start making shots it spells trouble. Fowles could be in the running for MVP if she keeps this up.
    PHX: Good thing they have Penny Taylor b/c she saved their butts on Sat. If DT doesn’t improve PHX will be having some issues in the future.
    LA: Once again they don’t have solid guards to compliment CP3. Since the season just started they could get their stuff together later on.

  • http://slamonline.com Clay Kallam

    I wish I could agree that Donovan is a good coach, but she lost more with the USA Senior Women than any coach in the past 20 years, and I thought she underachieved in Seattle after winning the one title.

    But we’ll see — if she can get this Liberty team to the conference finals, she’ll have done a fine job.

  • The Philosopher

    Shout out to Debbie Black.

  • DS44

    With the severe lack of television coverage the WNBA is destined to fail.

  • Clay Kallam

    >With the severe lack of television coverage the WNBA is destined to fail.

    The TV coverage is the same as it’s been for the past 10 years … during which time, people have been saying it’s destined to fail.

    There are reasons for concern, primarily due to the overall economy, but the league does need a couple more stable franchises. Its future is not dependent on TV deals, but rather in-arena attendance, which is driven locally, not with national television exposure.

  • Kelly

    Why not get the WNBA a magazine of their own and stop sticking them in the SLAM magazine. If anyone want to know about the WNBA, they will buy the magazine. Keep NBA separate. I’ve even noticed that WNBA advertisements are stuck in with the NBA advertisements. Don’t try to force the WNBA on people.

  • Barry

    Nice analysis as always, Clay.

  • a.r.

    slam is a basketball magazine, not an nba magazine. i don’t have a problem with a seperate wnba magazine if there is enough interest to sustain it. but slam has always provided excellent coverage of women’s bball & female players. it does a better job of consistently covering female athletes than any magazine i can think of. i became a true fan of slam after holdsclaw was on the cover back in the day in a knicks jersey. still my all time favorite slam cover!

Advertisement
Fullcourt.com