Tuesday, February 15th, 2011 at 9:45 am  |  22 responses

Top 20: Sue Bird, no. 6

The definitive ranking of the WNBA’s best players.

by Ben York / @bjyork

Some of you won’t care, and we’re about 99 percent positive we’ll get a few of the traditional “what is the WNBA?” comments we usually do. But this is long overdue – SLAMonline’s first ever in-depth player rankings for the WNBA.

Why just the top 20 and not the top 50? Simple. There are 18 fewer teams in the WNBA than the NBA and roster sizes are limited to 11 players. Thus, the NBA has hundreds of more players than the WNBA does – and this list needs and deserves to be competitive.

This list is based solely on projected performance in the 2011 season. Traditional player statistics are taken into account but being a successful and effective player in The W is so much more than that. It’s what each player means to the team – in terms of responsibility, leadership, management and all-around game.

We know you’ll see players you think should be on the list but aren’t. Conversely, you’ll also see players on the list that you’ll vehemently disagree with. Maybe you agree with the entire top 20. Just be sure to let us know in the comment section.

Also, check out Ben’s weekly podcast at WNBA.com.– Ed.

No. 6 – Sue Bird

“Sue doesn’t realize how good she is. She could average 25 a night, but she’s in it to make others better.”
Diana Taurasi

A few months ago, I was in a small coffee shop in downtown Phoenix figuring out the best way to format Sue’s bio for her official website. As a starting point, I began jotting down all of the accolades she has attained over the course of her collegiate and professional career.

This was more of a daunting task than I originally anticipated because…well…read for yourself:

- 2010 WNBA Champion, All-WNBA Second Team
– 2009 WNBA All-Star Selection, Most Valuable Point Guard, Ekaterinburg International Invitational, WNBA Peak Performer Award – Assists
– 2008 All-WNBA Second Team, 3rd in MVP voting, USA Gold Medal  Beijing
– 2007 WNBA All-Star Selection
– 2006 WNBA All-Star Selection, WNBA All-Decade Team
– 2005 WNBA All-Star Selection, All-WNBA First Team
– 2004 WNBA WNBA Champion and All-Star Selection, All-WNBA First Team, USA Gold Medal – Athens
– 2003 WNBA All-Star Selection, All-WNBA First Team
– 2002 Nancy Lieberman Award, National Championship, Naismith Award, Wade Trophy, Lowes Senior CLASS Award, Sportswoman of the Year, Big East Conference Women’s Basketball Player of the Year, No.1 Pick in 2002 WNBA Draft, All-WNBA First Team, WNBA All-Star, WNBA Rookie of the Year
– 2001 Nancy Lieberman Award
– 2000 Nancy Lieberman Award, National Championship
– 1998 WBCA All-American

Quite a list of accomplishments, eh? To have that successful of a career, in college and as a pro, is extraordinary and something very few players would be able to match.

Then, after finishing the list, I had something of an epiphany – Sue Bird, in spite of all those accolades, is one of the most underrated players in the WNBA.

Yes, you read that sentence correctly. No, I’m not crazy (in spite of what many of you think).

In fact, you could make a legitimate and convincing case for Sue Bird to be no.1 on this list; she is that good. Still, Bird doesn’t come close to getting the recognition she deserves in the media or in the public eye. Don’t get me wrong; she is loved all across the country but her sweet demeanor often overshadows how amazing of a basketball player she is.

I could go on and on about her efficiency and assist-to-turnover ratio (which rival the best in the league) but rather than get into a bunch of monotonous stats, I’d like to focus on exactly what separates Bird from other point guards. Like Steve Nash in the NBA, Bird knows precisely when to set up a teammate for a shot if they are struggling (in order to help boost their confidence), when to take over a game offensively (Bird, like Taurasi said, could average over 20 points a game if she wanted to or if the Storm needed her to), and when to push (or not push) the ball on offense.

She has a feel for the game that cannot be taught. She sees two or three plays ahead of time in her head and understands where to direct her teammates in order to get the best possible shot. As any player and point guard will tell you, that is so much easier said than done. Bird is, perhaps, the best player in WNBA history in terms of anticipating where the next pass should go and facilitating the offense to get to that point.

Sue isn’t overly flashy on the court and I think that is a big reason why she gets overlooked as one of the best players in the league. Again, like Steve Nash, there’s a beauty in Bird’s game that leaves you shaking your head in amazement. She knows exactly what angles to exploit on the court and can shred opposing defenses with pin-point accuracy.

She won’t dazzle you with a ton of behind-the-back passes or put on a dribbling exhibition, but she could teach a class on the best way to make an entry pass or lead a successful fast break. That’s what makes Sue’s game so remarkable – she plays basketball exactly how it was meant to be played.

In a culture where the fundamentals of basketball are often taken for granted, Bird has continually demonstrated why that shouldn’t be the case. For young women learning how to play the game, Bird is the quintessential model both on and off the court.

While we all know how great of a person she is, let’s give her a bit more credit for what she has done for the Storm (and the WNBA in general) as a player.

She doesn’t want it, but she deserves it.














y Ben York / @bjyork

Some of you won’t care, and we’re about 99 percent positive we’ll get a few of the traditional “what is the WNBA?” comments we usually do. But this is long overdue – SLAMonline’s first ever in-depth player rankings for the WNBA.

Why just the top 20 and not the top 50? Simple. There are 18 fewer teams in the WNBA than the NBA and roster sizes are limited to 11 players. Thus, the NBA has hundreds of more players than the WNBA does – and this list needs and deserves to be competitive.

This list is based solely on projected performance in the 2011 season. Traditional player statistics are taken into account but being a successful and effective player in The W is so much more than that. It’s what each player means to the team – in terms of responsibility, leadership, management and all-around game.

We know you’ll see players you think should be on the list but aren’t. Conversely, you’ll also see players on the list that you’ll vehemently disagree with. Maybe you agree with the entire top 20. Just be sure to let us know in the comment section.

Also, check out Ben’s weekly podcast at WNBA.com.– Ed.

No. 7 – Angel McCoughtry















  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • http://members.cox.net/pilight/ pilight

    Bird is the best PG in WNBA history.

    She’s not the MVP, she made her teammate the MVP. That’s what a PG is supposed to do.

  • Michelle

    I hope Birdy will lead the Storm to their 3rd title in the upcoming season. My favorite player for sure!

    p.s Ben, you forgot her 4 consecutive Euroleague titles with Sparkak Moscow.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Ben York

    Well said, @pilight.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Ben York

    @Michelle – My bad. I’ll add to the list.

  • wbbfan

    Bird isn’t just the best women’s PG’s to ever play the game, she’s one of the best PG’s, women OR men.

    She hasn’t forgotten what a PG’s job is-to set up your teammates and team to be successful. As the article stated, she doesn’t need or want to score 20 point; she’s happier to have 8 assists and a win. Without her, all those winning teams she’s been on wouldn’t have won.

    It’s too bad this generation of women PG’s, like the men, have all but forgotten what a PG’s job is. It’s not to score, it’s to run the team and make everyone better, not just herself.

    That’s why when All-”whatever” teams are chosen, Bird is always near the top. Her value doesn’t come from her scoring, but her leadership and understanding of her role in order to win. That’s why when she retires, the game will lose maybe the last of the “true” PG’s.

  • http://slamonline.com Ben York

    Good stuff, @wbbfan.

  • norwester

    I think I would have put Sue ahead of Catchings, at least. I know that as far as the world at large values players the other top 5 will always inevitably appear ahead of Sue (people like scoring), and while it’s hard to overstate what Catchings means to the Fever, Sue is in a class by herself, and has the resume to back it up.

    Splitting hairs, though. Both should have great seasons next year. You said it well, pilight.

  • Ellie

    Sue Bird is one of my heroes. She plays with her heart and in the end the whole team is better because of it. I once saw her single-handely beat the Sparks in triple overtimes. She played her hardest even after already playing a full game and two extra quarters. She didn’t do it for the win. She did it for the fans in the stands. I agree she is underrated. Anyone who is a fan of the Storm would agree. Hell, people on the Storm would agree. LJ may be the MVP, and she does deserve it, but if Sue wasn’t there to dish her the ball, would she be nearly as talented as she in now? Probably not.

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    Co-sign pilight as well.

  • http://zeebee jeff brainerd

    Sue Bird has been fantastic her entire career. Like her namesake Larry Bird, she doesn’t have incredible physical gifts, and like him, she has gotten 100% out of the talents she has. She always has her head in the game trying to get any edge that might lead to victory. She has always understood that winning is the goal, not personal achievements. All this, plus a great personality, sense of humor and hot looks makes her the my favorite WNBA player. She’ll always be #1 on my list.

  • Diane

    I’m SO glad to see Sue get the recognition she deserves!

  • Ann

    In addition to what everybody else has said… the no look passes. She can have no just the player guarding her but the whole team headed in one direction. Then without seeming to move a muscle she’s handed off the ball to the player headed the other direction. My favorite – watching her drop the ball over her shoulder as T cut in back of her. Eyes in the back of her head!

  • Robin1015

    I very much agree with what everyone has written. There is no doubt Sue is the best PG ever in WNBA history. No one dishes out passes better and as consistently than Sue. The Storm wouldn’t have been champions last year without her (clutch-shooting, decision making and the list goes on). Yes people usually overlook her value because she does not score 20+ points per game but ave. 8 assists in the playoffs is pretty unbelievable. Though she is probably one of the most popular and well loved by fans, I completely agree with you that Sue is a very an underrated player. She definitely deserves more credit and recognition. For the unquantifiable value she brings to Seattle and to the sport, like Jeff, she’ll always be #1 on my list.

  • stormfan2004

    “She may not be the loudest engine or have the flashiest colors, but you look underneath the hood of the car and you’ll see that the motor inside is indeed a race car”

  • Leslie V.

    Thank you for your kind and honest words about our too humble Sue Bird. The Storm would not have had the amazing wins they have had without her level headed plays and her astounding athleticism. Not only is she a great ball player, she gives back to the community in many ways. She donates both her time and enthusiasm. We are proud to have her as a key player with the Storm and LOVE her here in Seattle!

  • Rachel

    Sue deserves all these recognitions, but she never won Rookie of the Year.
    Despite that fact, I think she impacts the game in so many games and she doesn’t need these awards to demonstrate that she is the best PG in the world.

  • norwester

    Correction: Sue Bird was not the 2002 ROY in the WNBA. Catchings was (spending her real rookie season on the bench with injury, evidently making her eligible for the award in 2002)

  • Tom

    If Taurasi ever got traded to Seattle, they would win the next 5 championships easily. A combination of Bird, Taurasi, and Jackson would be unstoppable, as it was when they all played together for Spartak. Sue Bird is the best pure point guard in the league and one of the best, if not the best, of all time. Jackson has been in the top two or three players in the league throughout her career. Taurasi is the best player in the world right now and arguably the best ever. Oh, one can dream.

  • mhike

    @Tom: Ooh yeah! I followed Spartak’s team when they had all 3. They were amazingly unstoppable. They also had Tina Thompson and Syl Folwes in different seasons. I said how in the world they ended up playing together in one team. They won 4 straight all the while playing together almost every time!

  • Ace

    Go DT, called it. I hope she sues.

  • Ace

    My bad wrong post but I think Sue Bird should be ranked higher.

  • dewi

    I grown up watching basketball. All i know men play it. But one time my friend says about the women basketball, i start searching and watch the game. What i know just Becky Hammon, Diana Taurasi and Lauren Jackson. My friends said that Becky and Diana are good player. I know Lauren Jackson because my friend from Australia told me. But when i watch the game (Seattle vs Sparks), they call Sue Bird’s and i saw her that time as a great leader. Since that time until now, i always watch her game, her move… she has a beautiful game, the way she pass, run. What Diana says about her, that’s true, but what i heard about her from my friend who lives in Seattle, she doing that for her team, not for herself and yes, that’s the reason why she is that good. She deserves got a high credit even she won’t. I will always make her be my role model.

Advertisement
Fullcourt.com