Tuesday, November 6th, 2012 at 4:40 pm  |  16 responses

Air Force One

NBA players have put their weight behind President Obama’s re-election campaign.

by Dave Zirin / @edgeofsports

Under normal circumstances, this is the time of year when Louder Than a Bomb puts politics aside and makes a fearless NBA Finals prediction. Sometimes I nail it, like last year when I called the Thunder making it out of a hyper-competitive Western Conference. Other times I lose it, such as when I saw Playoff greatness in a now-disbanded Knicks team led by Zach Randolph and Eddy Curry. This year, there’s no need to devote an entire column to who will be the last two teams standing. Unless a meteor strikes the earth and the Mayans are at long last proven correct, the writing is on the wall. It’s Heat vs Lakers and there’s nothing Joel Anthony or Steve Blake can do to avert this destiny.

Instead, let’s focus on something else happening in November other than the start of another NBA season: a little thing known as the 2012 Presidential Election. Before you stop reading, I, too, would rather put out my eyes with a shrimp fork than read one more article on the scrum to become President.

But I did want to highlight something getting very little play in the mainstream media: the NBA players who have taken a stand against their tax bracket and for President Barack Obama. Given that the conventional wisdom is that athletes don’t speak out about politics, it’s notable that several top stars have lent their money, time and fame to re-elect Obama. They include Paul Pierce, Carmelo Anthony, Kyrie Irving, John Wall, Harrison Barnes and Austin Rivers. They also include former players like the famously apolitical Michael Jordan, Patrick Ewing and longtime friend of SLAM’s, Etan Thomas. WNBA legends like Dawn Staley and Sheryl Swoopes have put in time as well.

But the fundraisers, the autographs and the fancy dinners are less important than the motivations for why some of these folks have put themselves out there, especially when NBA owners by a substantial margin—MJ clearly excluded—are supporting Mitt Romney. Here, courtesy of Etan Thomas, are what some players said at a recent fundraiser in New York City.

“This is the first election that I have ever been a part of,” said Kyrie Irving. “My father voted for President Obama when I was 16 years old and introduced me to politics. My entire family voted for him. It is truly an honor and a blessing to be able to carry that tradition. He has my support and my vote. I am not afraid to speak out politically, I just have to become more educated on the subjects so that I can speak intelligently about various topics. But I am definitely not afraid to speak on politics.”

“I think it’s a great cause, and for all of us basketball players to come out here and support the President…[it] means a lot,” added John Wall. “The middle class and lower class…he’s trying to get better jobs for them. It doesn’t all happen in four years. It may take eight years to really get us where we need to go. I honestly don’t know why people think athletes are afraid of politics—we’re not afraid. It’s just that sometimes we want to be careful not to say the wrong thing, but we’re definitely not afraid. You see by all of us being involved here today that we aren’t afraid.”

“I feel it’s an honor to be involved here today,” said Austin Rivers. “This is the first year that I am old enough to get involved. I want to take full advantage of this opportunity to be a part of change. We are like everyone else, we want what’s right for the country we live in. I don’t think it’s true when people say that we don’t want to be involved. Look at all of the athletes we have here today…We are involved and we are here to support the changes that are going to happen in the United States.”

Just a reminder: The people you see on the court have more than hops and a wicked jump shot. They have minds and aren’t afraid to use them. No matter your own personal politics, that speaks well for the future of the NBA.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • Dave

    Sure, the President can hoop and give good speeches. He just didn’t do much these past 4 years and didn’t achieve what he promised he would. I would classify him as a Hasheem Thabeet….high promise and potential, but really didn’t do a thing.

  • Dagger

    I hate to bring politics into Slam, but I can’t resist. This article sums up Obama’s accomplishments better than I could: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/march_april_2012/features/obamas_top_50_accomplishments035755.php

  • Perry the PlatyPteranodon

    Well the thing about democracy is that, well it’s damn near impossible to get everything you promised. However statistically speaking, the President did quite well, based on distinct promises he made during his first campaign he’s fulfilled about 193, compromised on another 79 of them, about 44 are stalled and 102 are in the works sooooo he’s at least trying.
    Here’s a good reference guide:
    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/

  • Dave

    Sorry guys: on the big picture things, Obama a failure. Promised to cut the deficit in half: he doubled it, promised unemployment of around 5%, still at 8%. He has failed, plain and simple. Thabeet or Adam Morrison equalivalency.

  • LiquidityT

    Sure he promised a lot but what about the crisis which started in 2008? Before the 15th of september 2008, nobody what expecting a big economic crisis all around the world. He was elected in November when most agencies would have thought the crisis will end in 2009. Who could have predicted that, end of 2012, Europe would still have been this close to the end of its union? That China’ growth is at a pace unseen for the last three decades? Nobody was and still, the US are the only western country with a 2% GDP growth this year… Unemployment in Spain is over 25%… So 8% in the US? I don’t call this a failure…And even if he wasn’t has successful has expected, I don’t think someone who is the example of what’s wrong in our financial system is a good president.

  • Dutch Rich

    A simple analogy;
    I promised to bring you a burger with fries but half way to the table your buddy smacked the fries out of my hands. I’m thinking he did it on purpose so
    today your buddy is getting a beat down.

    I’ll get you your fries after.

  • AdamMorrison

    Not exactly the platform to discuss politics. Still though I can’t help. Obama ain’t no Morrison. He’s rather in a Charles Barkley (90s Barkley) situation. Good job, but too bad he had his peak when Mike was at his own best. Obama had to deal with the toughest economic crisis the western world has faced since 1929(!). There’s no other country in the world that has used all the government money equally effective to climb out the hole. Look at Japan or GB which are still stuck. Look at the political situation in Europe. Exactly none of the political leaders who were in charge during the crisis got re-elected. No matter how good their management actually was. Stop killing the messenger.

  • Dagger

    And here I was thinking that preventing a depression, saving the US auto industry, enacting health care reform, ending a war, and killing bin Laden were big picture things. Silly me.

  • Dagger

    Love the comparison, but then I did love Barkley.

  • shutup

    Plain and simple, if you don’t have a mill in the bank, can’t see how you would vote Romney, unless that is the president’s skin color is the deciding factor for you.

  • Ugh

    Actually, every major economic analyst in the world expected the GFC. I don’t know what the hell you were reading, dude.

  • nick

    owing 16 trillion dollars = a failure, owing more money in 4 years than all of our presidents COMBINED = failure get with it..

  • GC6

    Only Ron Paul had a plan to balance the budget and end the wars the two candidates are bankster globalist crooks.

  • GC6

    America is in the worst depression is history so what does Obama do print more money and give it to the banks. Stop making excuses for him Ron Paul put forward a budget balancing plan to end the depression.

  • http://www.facebook.com/chris.callihan1 Chris Callihan

    Well said, and very true

  • http://www.facebook.com/chris.callihan1 Chris Callihan

    Wait, what? First of all, don’t tell me you get any information from debates. Second, if you think Romney’s “plan” would have been better, then you truly are as ignorant as the post you just made. Not saying Obama’s a saint or anything like that. But don’t blame the deficit on him, c’m on son, if you had high school social studies you know better than that.

Advertisement