June 1, $115.
Tags: Jordan Brand
Read the SLAMonline Discussion Rules before posting.
I have a 25 dollar pair of Birdmans that look just like this from winners lol!!
Monster Mash. Huge midsole and not a lot of Jordan 2 in it, seen the mids in store, traction pattern is weird and not even close to the awesome Jordan 3 or Nike Court Force like Jordan 2.
Hey, how about slapping the Jordan namesake on any piece of sh!t shoe and watering down the market to the extent that any wigger with his mom’s allowance can purchase a brand name synonymous with a legend?
I’m so glad I didn’t order these for my store… Just brutally bad. Eastbay has em on special now, they’ve only been out a month. Stick to retros and team shoes, AJ, this is getting ridiculous.
I’m not feeling it.
These would be much better if they hadn’t gone cheap on the upper. If they used that carbon fiber mesh, these could’ve been dope.
I can’t digg these and I don’t know why but I most deff would’nt pay $115 for what!?!?
Am i the only one who thinks the Jordan Fusions are just an excuse for Jordan Brand not being able to come up with any more good sneaker designs????
Those are more like a 2.9.
Jordans shoes are getting boring….i think he should stop now
Nice, but I wouldn’t pay $115 for them…maybe $70…but not $115
High tops are better
I thought Jordan retired…
© 2013 Source Interlink Magazines, LLC, All rights reserved.