Friday, May 1st, 2009 at 12:01 am  |  13 responses

Jordan 2.5 Team Low

June 1, $115.

Jordan 2.5 Team Lowbanner-bottom15

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags:

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s35kBpvxfsc&feature=related James the balla

    I have a 25 dollar pair of Birdmans that look just like this from winners lol!!

  • http://www.slamonline.com Blinguo

    Monster Mash. Huge midsole and not a lot of Jordan 2 in it, seen the mids in store, traction pattern is weird and not even close to the awesome Jordan 3 or Nike Court Force like Jordan 2.

  • http://www.twitter.com/TheDiesel Anton

    Hey, how about slapping the Jordan namesake on any piece of sh!t shoe and watering down the market to the extent that any wigger with his mom’s allowance can purchase a brand name synonymous with a legend?

  • Andrew

    I’m so glad I didn’t order these for my store… Just brutally bad. Eastbay has em on special now, they’ve only been out a month. Stick to retros and team shoes, AJ, this is getting ridiculous.

  • http://www.another48minutes.blogspot.com Gerard Himself

    I’m not feeling it.

  • http://ittakesanationofmillionstoholdthissac.blogspot.com ciolkstar

    These would be much better if they hadn’t gone cheap on the upper. If they used that carbon fiber mesh, these could’ve been dope.

  • Cizzo

    I can’t digg these and I don’t know why but I most deff would’nt pay $115 for what!?!?

  • RBGdUP

    Am i the only one who thinks the Jordan Fusions are just an excuse for Jordan Brand not being able to come up with any more good sneaker designs????

  • http://slamonline.com Russ Bengtson

    Those are more like a 2.9.

  • http://www.kb24.com Kobe24Bryant

    Jordans shoes are getting boring….i think he should stop now

  • YusufCelticfan

    Nice, but I wouldn’t pay $115 for them…maybe $70…but not $115

  • http://finishline.com aaron12

    High tops are better

  • http://www.triplejunearthed.com/dacre Dacre

    I thought Jordan retired…

Advertisement