Thursday, February 18th, 2010 at 8:00 am  |  61 responses

Pau Gasol Is the MVP of the Lakers

And it’s not even close.

by Eddie Maisonet

Shoutout to Kenny for saying I didn’t have “the huevos” to write this story, but in actuality it’s something that’s needed to be said for years.

We all witnessed the spark of an interesting debate on Saturday night, as the good folks over at TNT raised some eyebrows in the response of the “fans” saying that Kobe Bryant was the NBA Player of the Decade.

By a resounding margin, Kobe was voted No. 1, capturing 54 percent of the vote. This leads me to believe that only Laker Stans voted in this poll. Charles Barkley, who after hearing that the vote skewed heavily to Kobe, said that “the fans don’t know anything” and said that Shaquille O’Neal should be the Player of the Decade. Then all of the other TNT panelists said the exact same thing.

Pretty resounding, isn’t it? The fans vote Kobe the Player of the Decade, yet Shaq won just as many titles as Kobe, Shaq was the preeminent force on those 2000-03 Lakers teams while Kobe was gradually growing in his role as Robin. Shaq leaves forced beyond his will Los Angeles and the Lakers go into the tank as Kobe can only take those teams to the bottom of the playoff bracket.

Enter Pau Gasol.

Hold up Ed, you’re not saying Pau Gasol is as good as Shaquille O’Neal are you?

Of course not.

However, in the first two seasons Gasol joined the team the Lake Show has been to the Finals both times. We forget that the biggest bonuses that having Shaq first, then Gasol later on the squad was tenfold. Having a well-respected big man down low allows Kobe more room to operate on the perimeter. Having a well-respected big man allows Kobe to rest and lets the offensive facilitate through someone else. Having the big man down low takes some of the defensive pressure off of Kobe, especially if someone gets by him.

Sure, Kobe’s more dynamic. He’s going to shoot the game-winners. He’s the poster child for the League. We all know this. If we were talking about the Most Outstanding Player for the Lakers and the NBA, of course Bryant wins this award.

However, the title is “Most Valuable” and from a value perspective it’s extremely tough to say isn’t more valuable. Plus, who’s to say that Gasol doesn’t make players better? Lamar Odom was almost traded roughly 38 times before Pau got there, however Gasol and Odom (and Bynum to a degree) remind some of the Uncles in our family to a Parish/McHale/Walton ’86 Celtics feel of a frontcourt. Other teams in the NBA have strategically reshaped their teams to beat LA, by adding frontcourt depth in particular.

The Lakers are 57-33 all-time when Bryant has been out of the lineup. Parse that down to 82 games, that’s about 52-30? In the 3 full seasons Kobe played without Gasol the Lakers had 34, 45, and 42 wins. In 2010, the Lakers have continued to show that they can win without Kobe. Could they win a title? I don’t think so, but they’d definitely get out of the first round and I truly believe they make a run to the finals. Kobe is an awesome individual player, and truly one of the greatest players of all-time. Yet, he’s been launched into this stratosphere which is somewhat undeserved and we must endure the fact that, “Kobe lead his team back to glory, he’s a true leader” and “He just wants it more than everyone else.” Really? No, the man wants rings and by GM Mitch Kupchak trading swindling with the Grizzles to get Pau, the power shift began in front of our faces.

Gasol’s filling Shaq’s role. One uses finesse, another uses brute force. However, one is generally pretty reserved (Gasol, although he’s also very swarthy and “unshowered” looking) while Shaq wanted the limelight as much as anyone in NBA history. However, they are both the true catalysts of the Lakers’ team and Phil Jackson knows it. He’d never say it though, he’s got to make sure Kobe and the fans know who the “real” MVP truly is.

Eddie Maisonet is a writer of all sports, who’s also a big-time hoops and Oklahoma City Thunder fan (Sooner State stand up!). Keep up with Eddie on SLAMonline as well as his award-winning blog at Ed The Sports Fan and on Twitter.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • http://www.edthesportsfan.com Ed The Sports Fan

    @Brad: I see you buddy, LOL. No, I honestly do believe that the Lakers could not win a championship without an elite big man. They proved it in years past with Shaq there versus Shaq not being there. Kobe struggled (38, 48, 44 wins respectively) without a legit big…wanted Odom traded, wanted Bynum traded and he wanted to bring in JASON KIDD! No sir, Gasol gets brought in and all of a sudden they’re in the NBA Finals. Took one year to get the chemistry, and in year 2 Gasol’s guarding Dwight Howard with no double team and helps get LA their 4th ring of the decade. Gasol is the MVP of the Lakers, Kobe’s the MOP.

  • asdf

    interesting idea , except the lakers were good before they got gasol . in 2007/08 before the got gasol they were near the top of the west . Bynum has improved dramatically, its not just pau’s arrival that improved the team from a borderline playoff team to champions

  • http://housethatglanvillebuilt.blogspot.com Reverend Paul Revere

    I don’t mean to let the cat out of the bag here, but Ed doesn’t exactly like Kobe very much (sorry Ed). If Pau is more valuable player, how come he could never do anything but have a shit team in Memphis (except once), when those players weren’t all that much worse than Kobe’s?

    Pau is vital to the Lakers, but nowhere near as vital as Kobe.

  • http://housethatglanvillebuilt.blogspot.com Reverend Paul Revere

    I hate to let the cat out of the bag, but Ed is a known Kobe hater (sorry Ed). If Pau is so much more valuable, how come he never had anything but shit teams in Memphis (except once) with players that weren’t that much worse than what Kobe was working with post-Shaq?

    Pau is definitely valuable to the Lakers, but not nearly as valuable as Kobe. You’re crazy.

  • roman

    This is the dumbest article almost read! If Pau is MVP how come he never won it with Memphis. And during the Lakers 3peat kobe wasnt turning into Robin, he was already batman. That is the reason Shaq and him couldnt get along. to alpha males on one team usually doesnt work.

  • http://www.limabedandcoffee.com robert

    Gasol MVP?
    ummmmmm, interesting.
    Maybe.

  • Nick

    Oh yeah Pau is the MVP of the Lakers alright. Just don’t put the ball in his hands when the game is on the line, like last night vs the Celtics or like in the loss @ Cleveland. Some MVP, he will pass the ball to you no doubt, get everyone some easier shots, but can he win a ball game for you it it was laid all on his shoulders? Nope. Had his chance to prove it in 2 games this season, choked both times. Kobe may chuck, but he certainly does not choke.

  • therighttoremainsalient

    Everyone knows the player of the decade is Rasheed Wallace.

  • maw

    You want the truth Fakers fans? You can’t handle the truth!!!

  • Pingback: SLAM ONLINE | » We’ve Seen This Lakers Team Before

  • http://none CJ

    I’m not really sure what Mr. Eddie Maisonet is yapping about… But I agree with Reverend Paul Revere, before Pau arrived at L.A, they were already having a great season. Pau’s arrival is just a plus.

    By the way, you mentioned that Shaq should be player of the decayed? and not Kobe? Why? do you think Shaq could win all those title with the Lakers if Kobe wasn’t there? Remember Shaq’s early days in the NBA, and he was with Penny. But still there were no rings when he used to be in Orlando Magic? And do you think Shaq could win his 4th title without Wade?

    It was all because he has good shooting guards in his side. Too bad he didn’t get his 5th ring this season when he was with the so-called “King” James.

Advertisement