Thursday, September 29th, 2011 at 10:08 am  |  60 responses

Top 50: Tony Parker, no. 35

The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players.

by Irv Soonachan / @SidelineOB

Tony Parker has an electric first step, but it’s not the most spectacular. Opponents fear his ability to get into the paint and tear through defenses, but a few others are more dangerous. In 10 years since joining the NBA he’s become an excellent shooter, though mainly from 15 feet in—many have deeper range. There are several point guards who see the floor better. In fact, among point guards of his generation there is one thing and one thing only at which Tony Parker is clearly the best: winning.

Parker wasn’t just the point guard of three Championship teams in San Antonio, he was a core starter and a three-time All-Star during the Spurs’ run. Since entering the NBA as an unknown 19-year-old from France (France!), he has played with increasing fearlessness every spring.

The NBA isn’t the only place he’s been tested, either ¾ he’s led his national team to victory in raucous European arenas, this summer guiding Les Blues to their first Silver Medal at the biennial Eurobasket Tournament since 1949. “He doesn’t get nervous, he just plays,” former teammate David Robinson once noted.

Veteran NBA coach Dick Motta said that you cannot possibly understand the pressure and magnitude of a big, late-series Playoff game until you’ve actually been there, and few have been there more than Parker.

And being among the best—if not quite the very best—at so many things has its advantages, too. Parker is a complete point guard. He can beat you in the paint, he can beat you with a jumper, he will find the open man, and most importantly he usually chooses the right option. Statistically he’s a 50 percent shooter every single year in a league full of point guards who can’t shoot, and every year he puts up solid assist/turnover numbers. He’s also the sparkplug who lifts up the Spurs’ energy level when the veteran team starts to sag.

Coach Gregg Popovich summarized it last season simply by calling Parker the guy who “keeps things copacetic” for a perennial Playoff team.

It wasn’t always this way. Early in his career Parker would hang his head after a poor first half, but now he comes back to attack you. Back then he was also a weak jump shooter, but over the past few years he’s conquered the midrange game and is now looking to improve from distance. If history is any guide, he’ll be drilling threes within a year or two.

It’s a shame that Parker has become better known for his tabloid exploits than his on-court play because as Tim Duncan has faded, the Frenchman has lifted his game to a higher level. On more nights than ever before, the Spurs depend on Parker and Manu Ginobili to get the job done, and on most nights, Parker answers the call.

SLAMonline’s 35th-ranked player in the NBA doesn’t put up the great numbers of those ranked above him, but in the face of the most crushing pressure the NBA has to offer, there are few people you’d rather see bringing the ball up. And there’s no statistic to measure the value of any point guard who can say that.

SLAMonline Top 50 Players 2011
Rank Player Team Position Pos. Rank
50 Luol Deng Bulls SF 8
49 Andrew Bogut Bucks C 7
48 Ray Allen Celtics SG 9
47 Marc Gasol Grizzlies C 6
46 David West Hornets PF 15
45 Kevin Martin Rockets SG 8
44 Andrew Bynum Lakers C 5
43 Brandon Jennings Bucks PG 11
42 Lamar Odom Lakers PF 14
41 Gerald Wallace Blazers SF 7
40 Brook Lopez Nets C 4
39 Joakim Noah Bulls C 3
38 Carlos Boozer Bulls PF 13
37 Kevin Garnett Celtics PF 12
36 Eric Gordon Clippers SG 7
35 Tony Parker Spurs PG 10

Notes
• Rankings are based solely on projected ’11-12 performance.
• Contributors to this list include: Maurice Bobb, Shannon Booher, David Cassilo, Bryan Crawford, Sandy Dover, Adam Figman, Jon Jaques, Eldon Khorshidi, Ryne Nelson, Doobie Okon, Ben Osborne, Quinn Peterson, Dave Schnur, Abe Schwadron, Dan Shapiro, Irv Soonachan, Todd Spehr, Tzvi Twersky, Yaron Weitzman, DeMarco Williams and Ben York.
• Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    I only said that to show how Billups has not proven he is an elite PG in every system. I realize the nuggets wont be very good next season. Especially cinsidering how many of their minutes now reside in china

  • davidR

    yea, people often talk about how much better the nuggets were when they traded iverson for billups, yet their wins didnt improve by much, and they made it to the WCF cuz they had back to back easy matchups (while those iverson nuggets ran into the spurs & lakers in the 1st round, AND didn’t have reliable big men besides camby)

  • Armando

    Close between Nash and Billups? Come on. To say that Nash’s stats is a result of the system, is like saying Magic was a result of the system. Both ENABLED their teams to play those systems. The Lakers even played at a higher pace than Nash’s Suns, and it wasn’t like Magic handled the ball less than what Nash do (not saying their at the same level, Magic’s the best, but Nash is top 10 all time at the 1). IMO Nash is the 4th best PG in the league and will be next season as well with Rondo and Westbrook behind him (not far behind, but still behind). If anyone want’s to argue that they’re better, well OK, but don’t just list ppg and apg, percentages count, and Nash never ages… only using the easiest understandable stats you could say that Monta is better than Kobe and Humphries is at the same level as Tyson Chandler… it’s more complicated than that…

  • http://www.slamonline.com Wayno

    Steve Nash always has been and is still a terrible defender…offense isn’t everything kids.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    ^Who said otherwise Wayno?

  • Drig

    Top 10 PG of all time?

    Magic (Showtime)
    Oscar (Big O and the walking triple double)
    Isiah
    Stockton
    Frazier
    Kidd
    Payton
    Cousy ( One guy I never did see…..in any form but his stats sure are great….. and 8 chips do help )
    Archibald
    AI XD and CP3 soon:P

    Basically, it’d come down to Kevin Johnson vs Nash……Defense……

  • Drig

    By stats I meant accomplishments with regards to Cousy.

  • Armando

    Co-sign LakeShow… revolutionary comment Wayno… Nash > Tiny, KJ, Wilkens… (Magic wasn’t a good defender either). KJ was a better defender than Nash, but a flat out bad shooter for a guard and wasn’t near Nash in the “controlling-a-game-department” (I’m old enough to remember him btw)and again, don’t let the stats fool you into believing he is an all time great (look up Fat Lever for a “great stats, not great but pretty good player reference”). KJ played for some pretty good Suns teams, but Nash has never had a Barkley caliber player on his team either. KJ was indeed very good, but belongs in the next tier after Magic, Oscar*, Stockton, Zeke, Frazier*, Cooz*, Kidd, Payton, Nash and Tiny. (*I never saw these guys, but based on accomplishments…).

  • Rainman

    i cant believe this was even discussed lol…but Nash >>>>>>>>>>>Billups. WAAYY wide MArgin.

    Also, Armando above me jsut listed the top 10 PG’s pretty much there

    1. Magic.
    2.Oscar(for me personally, Stockton second…best pure PG ever to me)
    3.Stockton
    4.Isiah
    5.Frazier
    6Cousy
    7.Kidd
    8.Payton
    9.Nash
    10.Tiny.

    Although to me, by the end of his career he’ll surpass PAyton(Even tho payton was a more complete player, Nash playing so great for as long as he has, he’s only going up, c’mon ppl) And eventually Guys liek CP3 if all goes well, will enter the top 10 as well.

  • http://slamonline 3kings

    so why is tyreke higher??? I think thats bs. parker is way better and way underated

Advertisement