Tuesday, October 11th, 2011 at 5:41 pm  |  62 responses

Top 50: LaMarcus Aldridge, no. 18

The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players.

by Dan Shapiro

This might be the biggest jump on this year’s Top-50 list. At No. 42 going into last season, LaMarcus Aldridge was a guy with respectable numbers and a ton of potential. The thinking was: He’s only 25, he’s got all this raw talent and he’s a big man—who tend to develop slower.

The Blazers agreed by putting up top dollar for him and Brandon Roy, in the summer of ’09. Locking him up for five years with a generous $65 million deal seemed, at the time, both hopeful and inflated for a guy who, well, could be No. 42 on anyone’s list of the League’s top players.

How easily we could be talking about him in terms of the inflated contracts that are characteristic of this lockout?

Instead, we find him this year at an elite 18-spot. The jump’s due to a deserved spot on last season’s All-NBA Third-Team, earned with career numbers of 22 points and 9 boards.

Beyond the numbers, we have a guy who stepped up into a leadership role with all the right intangibles of a team player. From all accounts, Aldridge works hard in the offseason, and for a young guy with a swollen bank account, he carries himself in a humbled and respectful manner. He’s a student of the game and the kind of guy who feels lucky to be in his position.

He’s playing his ass off too.

Entering into this year’s Playoffs, the LaMarcus-led Blazers seemed to be everyone’s favorite upset pick for a reason.

When he’s on the court he seems to be involved in every play in the vicinity of the basket. With Wesley Matthews, the now-traded Rudy Fernandez and Andre Miller, LaMarcus Aldridge was on the backend of countless ‘oops—a skill indicative of his feel for the spacing of the court and touch around the basket. That’s rare for a guy of his size and athleticism.

This year he became of those guys who had a presence on the court. It’s an element of a game that can’t be computed to a stat, but when you have to be constantly aware of one guy when he’s on the court—devoting double-teams to him, loosing your normal offensive rhythms—that, to me, defines an elite player.

These are the subtle skills that will help him continue to grow into a perennial All-Star. We saw a glimpse of the player he is this year, and at a fresh 26, you can count on some serious production out of the big man for years to come.

He’s doing this all on a team that’s out of the national spotlight. I lived in Portland and have experienced what it’s like in the Rose Garden. Every home game, there’s a Playoff-like atmosphere. Those fans have stuck by that team despite it skipping Kevin Durant in the Draft, and watching Brandon Roy, despite heroic efforts, appearing to be permanently limited by nagging knees. There’s a buzz in that city for all things Blazers that’s unique to only a couple of franchises in all of sports.

For LaMarcus, to be stepping up in that climate—in light of all that the franchise’s has gone through—speaks volumes to his character as a composed, long-term leader in one of the great basketball towns.

They’ve shuffled some pieces and acquired both Raymond Felton and Nolan Smith to come in and run their point position. Both of those guys (obviously the rookie Smith) are unproven but could thrive in that market, which is kind of reminds me of their respective alma maters UNC and Duke. Concentrated, loyal fan bases with patience and knowledge of the game.

Combine their potential with the emergence of Wesley Matthews, the return of Gerald Wallace and Marcus Camby and they’ll, again, be in the conversation in the ’12 Playoffs.

There’s the looming question in Portland of the two fluttering franchise pieces: Greg Oden and Roy. Roy’s fall has got to be one of the worst in professional sports that didn’t involve a wife and a golf club. Roy was our No. 11 player last year. He didn’t make the Top 50 this year.

I’m not sure, Roy’s not sure, if he can contribute to the Blazers in any significant way this year.

LaMarcus Aldridge will. He’s at 18 in the Top 50. This isn’t a coronation. He’s still got to improve, and make his game, and that of the Blazers, more than just a first-round threat.

SLAMonline Top 50 Players 2011
Rank Player Team Position Pos. Rank
50 Luol Deng Bulls SF 8
49 Andrew Bogut Bucks C 7
48 Ray Allen Celtics SG 9
47 Marc Gasol Grizzlies C 6
46 David West Hornets PF 15
45 Kevin Martin Rockets SG 8
44 Andrew Bynum Lakers C 5
43 Brandon Jennings Bucks PG 11
42 Lamar Odom Lakers PF 14
41 Gerald Wallace Blazers SF 7
40 Brook Lopez Nets C 4
39 Joakim Noah Bulls C 3
38 Carlos Boozer Bulls PF 13
37 Kevin Garnett Celtics PF 12
36 Eric Gordon Clippers SG 7
35 Tony Parker Spurs PG 10
34 Andre Iguodala 76ers SG 6
33 Al Jefferson Jazz PF 11
32 Al Horford Hawks C 2
31 Stephen Curry Warriors PG 9
30 Tim Duncan Spurs PF 10
29 Josh Smith Hawks PF 9
28 Manu Ginobili Spurs SG 5
27 Tyreke Evans Kings PG 8
26 Rudy Gay Grizzlies SF 6
25 John Wall Wizards PG 7
24 Danny Granger Pacers SF 5
23 Monta Ellis Warriors SG 4
22 Joe Johnson Hawks SG 3
21 Paul Pierce Celtics SF 4
20 Steve Nash Suns PG 6
19 Zach Randolph Grizzlies PF 8
18 LaMarcus Aldridge Blazers PF 7

Notes
• Rankings are based solely on projected ’11-12 performance.
• Contributors to this list include: Maurice Bobb, Shannon Booher, David Cassilo, Bryan Crawford, Sandy Dover, Adam Figman, Jon Jaques, Eldon Khorshidi, Ryne Nelson, Doobie Okon, Ben Osborne, Quinn Peterson, Dave Schnur, Abe Schwadron, Dan Shapiro, Irv Soonachan, Todd Spehr, Tzvi Twersky, Yaron Weitzman, DeMarco Williams and Ben York.
• Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • KH10

    In a playoff series I’d take Zbo every time, LA is a really good player with great fundamentals but Is a weak rebounder only getting 8.8 in 40 mins a game and doesn’t create his own offense the way Zbo, Amare and Dirk can.

  • http://sajkflf.com Jukai

    Real talk: If Kevin Love went on a contender, he’d average 17-18 rebounds a game… because he’d stop having to put up points.
    You guys reallllly hate Kevin Love. I know he shouldn’t be higher than ZBo and LA, but there’s no one else I’d put ahead of him. So he’s two spots misplaced. That’s not that bad.

  • marc

    I am a kevin love fan but there is no way he’s better then LA. I hope he’s next on the list because if not SLAM will be pushing it. lol

  • Truth

    The guy that is too high is Rondo, easily!

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    ZBo is too low. Way too low. Lamarcus Aldridge is nice, but no way he should be ranked higher than ZBo. He will be better eventually, though.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    @ Enigmatic: Love gets five years because he’s been a bench player for his first 2.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Alrdidge defends. ZBo doesn’t. They also score at the EXACT same pace on the same amount of shots, at just about the same %. Aldridge just doesn’t rebound as well, but that’s usually because he’s actually playing defense.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Love played 25 and 28 minutes per his first two seasons.
    Come on now, it’s not like he was buried on the bench.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Let’s be real, if Portland called Kahn right now and said they would trade Lamarcus straight up for Love he would agree in a heartbeat.
    Portland would laugh in the T-Wolves face.
    With Love, who is very good, his offensive game isn’t currently built to dominate. That’s a problem in a League when your best player is counted on to carry your team offensively in some way.

  • Post scoring

    Aldridge played half his minutes as a speed center. Aldridge has Gerald Wallace Kevin Love has Michael Beasley and Darko Milicic.

    Look up their WS/48. Didn’t Carmelo have Nene and a certain Hall of Famer in his 3rd season? This is embarassing.

    Kevin Love Wins Shared 11.4 Wins in 2611 minutes.

    Aldridge? 3211 minutes only 11.1 Wins.Lamarcus is he a defensive anchor? A stretch 4? Couldnt coexis with Roy and oden… He’s a tweener.

  • ripcitystrobes

    I have watched almost every Blazer game in LA’s career and about 100 in person; I have also seen about 8 Kevin love games as well as high school games. LA is hands down a much better player. Roy used to run the offense, which is slow on top of Nate McMillans offense which relies on slowing the game down and being more efficient than the other teams (low turnovers, high free throw %, offensive rebounds, defense). Z Bo was also traded because the blazers drafted LA, which says something. Love is a stat padder, very good I would take him on my team, but never as a centerpiece to a championship team. LA on the other hand, has the potential to possibly be that guy, as Roy continues to decline, and as his post game gets better, he will be great. He also needs to work on his 4th quarter free throws. He added 15 lbs of solid muscle last offseason, the guy can guard out on the perimeter, fast guys as well as centers, and will continue to be more reliable on defense and rebounding. Remember, he plays next to Gerald Wallace and Marcus Camby, and maybe Oden one day so there isn’t much rebounds available.. It was pathetic Love went to the all star game over LA last season.

  • http://slamonline 3kings

    solid pf. But doest have the range that love has or rebounding ability. get 20 and 20 a every game and then ur better than love

Advertisement