Tuesday, October 16th, 2012 at 3:00 pm  |  77 responses

Top 50: Steve Nash, no. 21

The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players for ’12-13.

by Yaron Weitzman | @YaronWeitzman

There really is no explanation for Steve Nash being No. 21 on this list.

It’s not that he’s undeserving of this honor; any point guard who can average 12.5 points and 10.7 assists per game while shooting 53 percent from the field, 39 percent from behind the arc and 89 percent from the charity stripe most certainly does. Rather, what I mean is that, well, he’s old. Like really old.

Steve Nash is currently 38 years old. On February 7 he will turn 39, which is exactly how old Jalen Rose and Chris Webber are, and I’m pretty certain I’ve been watching the two of them analyze the game they used to play for the past 10 years.

Thirty-eight-year-old professional basketball players are supposed to be in the decline phases of their careers. Actually, they’re not supposed to be in the midst of any career phase; when an NBA player gets to his upper 30s, his career is supposed to be something that was, not is.

The few anomalies that are able to hang on usually do so by serving as a contending team’s veteran presence on the bench. They certainly aren’t supposed to be the best players and focal points of their teams, and they certainly aren’t supposed to put up near historic shooting numbers like Nash did last season.

What’s most incredible about Steve Nash, though, is that his ability to combat the undefeated foe of father time in a way that few ever have may not even be the most impressive line on his resume. In fact, the most impressive line on his resume is probably the fact that it’s so hard to choose just one impressive line.

Think about this: Steve Nash may be the greatest shooter in the history of the NBA. Only seven players in the sport’s history have shot at least 50 percent from the floor, 40 percent from behind the arc and 90 percent from the free-throw line for a season. Nash has accomplished that feat four times, and nearly hit those marks again last year. No one else has done so more than twice. Yet shooting is rarely the first skill that someone mentions when talking about what makes the two-time MVP so great.

How many players can that be said about it? How many players in the history of the sport have done something on the court better than anyone else ever has, only to see that skill constantly relegated to the bottom of the list when factors behind said player’s greatness are being discussed? It would be like not mentioning defense when trying to explain what made Bill Russell so great. That just doesn’t happen, yet with Nash, the conversation—rightfully so—always starts with his passing and court vision and leadership, not with his historic ability to efficiently shoot a basketball.

This year, though, things will be different. This year, Nash will be wearing purple and gold and playing in Los Angeles and sharing the court with Kobe Bryant. This year, Nash will not be handed the keys to the car, or at least not as frequently as he was during his eight years in Phoenix. This year, Nash will have to defer to Kobe and throw the ball into the post and spend time spotting up on the wing.

But what makes Nash so great is that he’s not just a system point guard—a la Raymond Felton or Jeremy Lin—who only thrives when allowed to play a certain way. When you can shoot and pass and dribble and think like Nash, you become the rare piece that can smoothly fit into any puzzle.

Nash’s shooting will give the Lakers some much-needed spacing when Pau Gasol and Bryant are posting up. His brilliance in the pick-and-roll will give Dwight Howard—statistically, the best pick-and-roll finisher in the NBA last season—and the Lakers more easy baskets than either had all of last year. His uncanny ability to elevate the play of those around him—last season, Nash’s Phoenix teammates shot 47.4 percent when he was on the floor and 41.6 percent when he wasn’t—may be the only chance the Lakers have of winning a title while they have players like Steve Blake and Jordan Hill getting minutes off the bench.

As the ‘12-13 NBA season approaches, many seem to be under the belief that the Lakers can be a Championship contender and one of the best offensive teams in the League if Nash can figure out how to play with Bryant and Howard and Gasol. That line of thinking is backwards.

The Lakers will be a Championship contender and one of the best offensive teams in the League because Nash is playing with Bryant and Howard and Gasol. There’s no if.

Not when an offensive wizard like Steve Nash is involved.


Where should Steve Nash rank in the SLAMonline Top 50?

Loading ... Loading ...
SLAMonline Top 50 Players 2012
Rank Player Team Position Pos. Rank
50 Greg Monroe Pistons C 8
49 Tyreke Evans Kings PG 14
48 Brandon Jennings Bucks PG 13
47 Stephen Curry Warriors PG 12
46 Ricky Rubio TWolves PG 11
45 Al Jefferson Jazz PF 14
44 Anthony Davis Hornets PF 13
43 Serge Ibaka Thunder PF 12
42 Al Horford Hawks C 7
41 Ty Lawson Nuggets PG 10
40 Danny Granger Pacers SF 6
39 Tim Duncan Spurs PF 11
38 John Wall Wizards PG 9
37 Monta Ellis Bucks SG 8
36 Zach Randolph Grizzlies PF 10
35 Roy Hibbert Pacers C 6
34 Tyson Chandler Knicks C 5
33 Eric Gordon Hornets SG 7
32 Kevin Garnett Celtics PF 9
31 Manu Ginobili Spurs SG 6
30 Amar’e Stoudemire Knicks PF 8
29 Marc Gasol Grizzlies C 4
28 DeMarcus Cousins Kings C 3
27 Paul Pierce Celtics SF 5
26 Andre Iguodala Nuggets SG 5
25 Rudy Gay Grizzlies SF 4
24 Josh Smith Hawks PF 7
23 Derrick Rose Bulls PG 8
22 Joe Johnson Nets SG 4
21 Steve Nash Lakers PG 7

Notes
• Rankings are based solely on projected ’12-13 performance.
• Contributors to this list include: Jake Appleman, Maurice Bobb, Rodger Bohn, Brendan Bowers, Franklyn Calle, David Cassilo, Bryan Crawford, Adam Figman, Eldon Khorshidi, Eddie Maisonet III, Ryne Nelson, Ben Osborne, Allen Powell II, Sam Rubenstein, Jonathan Santiago, Abe Schwadron, Leo Sepkowitz, Dave Spahn, Ben Taylor, Tzvi Twersky, Peter Walsh, Tracy Weissenberg, Yaron Weitzman, DeMarco Williams and Dave Zirin.
• Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • Dutch Rich

    Fair. Guards left in order.
    Rondo
    Kyrie
    TP
    DWill
    CP3

  • Dutch Rich

    Correction
    Rondo
    TP
    Kyrie
    DWill
    CP3

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    oh how overrated a guy can be. he’s going to play what, 32 minutes a night? max? and he doesn’t defend. this ranking is off imo – for example, it will be pretty hard to convince me Nash does more/better for LA this year than Josh Smith does for Atlanta. Or considering what he does, I doubt he is more important to LA than Garnett is to Boston. If we are comparing veterans that is.

  • Sérgio

    I agree with you. KG is too damn low in this list.

  • Dutch Rich

    Go take your medicine and come back, we’ll wait for you

  • Otis

    That means that KG is too low, though, not that Nash is too high…

  • justin05

    I don’t think the rating is too high but Slam hardly takes defense into consideration anyway, we know that. Will Dwight get spot #3 because of his defense though?? hmm.. I say Nash is about 27th in the league

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    It means both.

    .

  • MUBWAR

    this is blasphemous. Nash is easily a top 15 player. 12 and 11 while shooting 50 40 90. the only reason he is not a top 10 player is because he cannot defend anyone but dwight will take care of that.

  • justin05

    There are 6 point guards left. Kyrie Irving, Deron Williams, Rajon Rondo, Tony Parker, Russell Westbrook, and Chris Paul. That’s my guess but it’s hard to compare all of those guys. Cp3 is the clear #1 and Irving should be next.

  • http://twitter.com/niQknacks niQ

    You forgot Westbrook.

  • LeroyShonuff

    Soo he’s better than Garnett, Rudy Gay, Josh Smith, Rose, Iggy and Timmy??? No way slam. No way. He is a worse defender than Jameer Nelson ever was and Dwight got tired of cleaning up after him. When the lakers slow the pace down, he will get kobe, artest, pau and others in foul trouble by them consistency having to help on defense. He should of been in the 40′s. Yes he can still shoot, but shooting and passing ability doesn’t justify a ranking this high. I’m just waiting for Blake and Love to be ranked in the top 10. Hilarious

  • Onions Baby Onions

    Not overrated. His defensive shortcomings can be mitigated by the right system, and as the article points out, he’s arguably the best passer and shooter in the entire league. The things Kobe will be able to do as a result of getting the ball sent perfectly into his shooting pocket off a little curl, and the things Dwight will be able to do off a dime in the lane more than justify Nash’s rating.

  • LakeShow

    Hard to rank Mr. Nash this year. He is on a team loaded with talent, but we still know he can make any team compete which I don’t think the same could be said for Rudy Gay or even Josh Smith. The same could be said though for Kevin Garnett. I would like for Garnett and Duncan to be a bit higher, but I like Nash in the #20-25 area.

  • Datkid

    not bad. but I disagree.
    Kyle
    kyrieTPWestbrookRondoDwillCP3I would actually flip Cp3 and Dwill and Westbrook and Rondo but I feel like that’s what they’ll pick.

  • Onions Baby Onions

    Completely agree on all points. What people don’t take into account when they compare Nash or Garnett to athletic wings like Josh Smith is that any player with J-Smoove levels of athleticism and a moderately high basketball IQ can drop 25 and look good (even dominant) while doing so. You can pretty much replace Iguoadala, J. Smith, Rudy etc. with one another and their teams would be the same. But Nash’s/Garnett’s/Duncan’s abilities to consistently make their teams competitive speaks to a much rarer quality that is not easily replaced.

  • LakeShow

    So outside of Garnett, whom I agree is slightly better, who is listed that is better than Nash?

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    I have Nash at #30 in my Off the Top of the Head Top 50 – of the guys who have been listed, i have (in descending order based on my list) – Iguodala, Pierce, MGasol, JSmith, Duncan, Manu, Rose, Garnett as better than Nash this season.
    .
    I won’t argue about Pierce, Iguodala, Duncan, Manu, or Rose though as I see a logical argument that Nash is “better” than all of them.
    .
    I also have 1 player on my list who probably didn’t make the top 50 (Joakim Noah) who I have as better than Nash.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    that’s not far off where i have him, i have Nash at 30.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    that doesn’t make sense.

  • Rainman

    Should easily be a top 20 player, probably more like 15…

  • Rainman

    And wait…Kyrie is better than Steve Nash?After just one year? Come the fk on Slam…

  • brad09′

    i dont think his defense is top 180 in the league i duno how he deserves a top 30 spot. Granted he does have amazing offensive numbers.

  • Dutch Rich

    The Thunder don’t have a starting point guard IMO. Shave 4 inches off and he might not be in the league. Add 3 and you have one of the best small forwards ever. I’m lumping him with the shooting guards. 6 PG’s out of 20 left is too PG heavy for me. I don’t think we should consider the supposed domination of the PG position that significant.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    it’s pretty easy to see based on the votes in this comment section that the majority of (comment section) readers are Lakers fans.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Well, he was better last season, so…..

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk
  • Datkid

    I can see where you’re coming from but I disagree. RW is explosive, able to run at the speed of light forever, surprisingly strong, an underrated passer, and can separate from a midrange whenever he wants. He might not be as effective being 4 inches smaller, but he’d still be dangerous and still in the league. and w/ a tall “true” pg who can spread the floor w/ his shooting and still handle passing duties like brandon knight for example he’d be very potent.

  • Rainman

    No he wasnt… He will be in the future, but he wasnt last year. 12 on 50-40-90 to go with 10.7 assists, and leada team that had NO business even being in the discussion to being one game away from the postseason (Frye got knocked out with his shoulder injury the last few games) and to a .500 record… Who did he have on his team? Dudley? Gortat? a 40 year old Grant hill? Shannon brown? Kyrie looked good last year, but he isnt nearly as polished offensively as Nash is and is almost as bad of a defender (and u always complain about Nash’s defence so…)

  • Rainman

    Not a Laker fan. But maybe the votes are a product of ppl knowing that u’ve been underrating nash for a long time now. I agree with u on a lot of things (based on ur comments on other articles ive seen), Steve Nash isnt one of them.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    i have been underrating Steve Nash for a long time? LOL – i think you are thinking of someone else.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    You are right, he wasn’t better, but I could definitely make an argument that he was. He was more productive, and he was more efficient in terms of overall production. — But Irving was actually the worst defensive PG (actually, player) who consistently played in the entire league last season and he wasn’t quite as efficient per possession (even though his PER begs the differ)
    .
    Other than that though, it is you who is underrating the Suns last season. Gortat is one of the best Centers in the league. Grant Hill was productive offensively while being one of the best perimeter defenders in the league. Dudley is a 38% 3pt shooter, who is an above average defender that doesn’t make many mistakes. The team is chalk full of solid role players, and they were built around Nash and that system perfectly to maximize their success….and Frye played in 64 games last year, he missed a total of 2.
    .
    I live in Phoenix dude. Knowing the Suns in and out with how much basketball I watch is kind of a given here.

  • http://twitter.com/AjpDos Allen Powell

    I don’t think he’s on the level of Felton or Lin, but that doesn’t mean his numbers weren’t partially a product of the system.
    The last time he played in a slowdown style with a decent big man, he struggled. We shall see if he corrected that problem.

  • Rainman

    Maybe. But ur constantly calling Nash overrated from what i recall

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    naw that ain’t me. i only call him overrated when he gets overrated. which isn’t very often anymore. Allen used to be about how overrated Nash was or he got in those conversations on a semi consistent basis a couple years ago tho, that might be what you are thinking of? — Slam had Nash at 20 last year, and I had no issues with it, for example.

  • LakeShow

    True. And true. Although, he only struggled by his own lofty standards not by ordinary PG standards.

  • Rainman

    Big Suns fan here too, but really, Who had them being anywhere in the discussion realistically? (outside of phx) Also take into consideration that they basically played at their level at teh beginning of the season (much below .500 , i forget the actual record) and played ridiculously over their heads in the second half (much above .500, again, forget exxact record). Even Steve Himself said, they kinda overachieved.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    I actually had them as the 8 seed last year so I overrated them as a team. I remember being told I was nuts for putting them that high and I apparently was. Barely.
    .

  • Perry the PlatyPteranodon

    *Steven A voice* Th-thi- THIS IS BLASPHEMOUS!!!

  • Rainman

    My bad in that case, man

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Oh no stress at all

  • Ethos

    Lol at anyone taking these lists as science.

  • danpowers

    nice read. i just wonder since when defense became a part of the game not wort being mentioned.

  • TR

    You guys think earl jr will ever make the list

  • Caboose

    I’m sorry, but this is an atrocious ranking. First of all, he’ll probably average around 11-7. There’s no way he puts up anything close to his Phoenix stats in LA’s slow-down, pound it out system. Also, his defense is putrid. I’m talking just a shade above Calderon and Ridnour bad. I’d put him towards the 40′s, but that’s just me.

  • hugo

    wow, i wouldnt have thought the beard wouldve cracked the top 20…

  • http://twitter.com/AjpDos Allen Powell

    I mean he put up like 14 and 8. That is cool not great

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Gilbert/100001749589586 Mike Gilbert

    Rondo should be above Kyrie and TP IMO…hes improved every year since he has been in the league…coming off the best year of his career I don’t see why he would stop improving now

  • Ugh

    I’m also worried about how many fouls Dwight will rack up witH Nash’s man driving to the rack 25 times a game.

  • Caboose

    To all those who disliked this comment, give me a defense of Nash, other than the fact that he’s got 2 MVP’s.

Advertisement