Friday, May 11th, 2012 at 9:00 am  |  146 responses

Kobe Bryant: Andrew Bynum, Pau Gasol Must Play Better


by Marcel Mutoni @marcel_mutoni

Based on their play and level of competitiveness in Game 6, it was hard to tell who was the sickest: Kobe Bryant or his lifeless teammates.

The Denver Nuggets ran the Los Angeles Lakers off the floor last night in humiliating fashion, forcing a decisive Game 7 in the process. Afterwards, Kobe Bryant (who fought off a nasty illness to score 31 points) openly criticized the two seven footers on his team who were supposed to have made the Nuggets old news by now.

An enraged Kobe also guaranteed that he’ll stay in Andrew Bynum and Pau Gasol’s ears leading up to tomorrow night’s series-deciding showdown.

From NBA.com:

Already facing pressure to step up their play as the Lakers’ advantage of size and inside play goes to waste, Gasol and Bynum were moved even more into the crosshairs by Mike Brown and Kobe Bryant, both clearly frustrated by Gasol managing three points on one-of-10 shooting with three rebounds and by Bynum getting 11 points on four-of-11 shooting. Bynum did have a game-high 16 rebounds, but his series has become a run of nights without focus. “We’re going to need more out our two bigs,” Brown said. “They’re our second- and third-best players. We’re going to need a lot more out of those guys in order to win the series. But not just scoring wise. Defensively. Defensively to follow the game-plan discipline and do it with some effort and some energy and really just lay it out on the line.”

Bryant followed soon after. “Of course I agree with that,” he said of Brown’s critique. “I talked with Pau a little bit after the game and I’ll speak with Andrew as well. It’s one of those things where psychologically you have to put yourself in a predicament, in a position, where you have no other option but to perform. You have to emotionally put your back to the wall and kind of trick yourself, so to speak, to feel that there’s no other option but to perform and to battle, when you have that, when you have that mindset, your performance shines through, your talent shines through. It doesn’t matter what the defense does. It doesn’t matter because you’re emotionally at a level that is above that. That is the mindset that they have to put themselves in.”

The Denver Nuggets must now travel to L.A., and try to pull off the seemingly impossible. Can they overcome inexperience and potential jitters on the biggest stage imaginable?

As for the Lakers, the only bit of good news last night, is that Metta World Peace will play in Game 7, and Kobe bitterly noted that he’s the only teammate that he can truly count on to be aggressive every game. It remains to be seen, however, how well Metta can perform given that he’s missed the last seven games due to suspension.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , ,

  • AsadSaleh3

    The Lakers lost in 2004 because they tried to put together a super team and it didn’t work. The Pistons were well-coached by Larry Brown and they had a complete team that the Lakers didn’t match up well with.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.l.brewer3 BlackPhantom

    No, I’m not gonna argue with that. That’s the thing about Kobe though, I love his determination, work ethic, and will to win, but I hate his selfishness. I personally believe if he weren’t selfish, he’d put up about 27/5/7 on a year-in and out basis, probably even more points throughout his prime. But I think when it comes to passing and court vision, he’d probably be alot like LeBron is now, or like the type of passing numbers seen from MJ throughout his career. He’s done it before, He averaged 30/7/6 in 02-03.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Everyone knows Kobe is selfish. Arguing it is honestly stupid. I understand that you are an irrational Lakers fan. Just take a step back realize what everyone else does. And the reason Buss wanted him out is because Kobe was set to sign a max extension which would have caused him and Shaq to use up about 66% of the Salary Cap just between them two. He chose Kobe because he was younger.
    .
    And I have no issues with Kobe whatsoever, I love watching him play, always have and always will. But that doesn’t hamper my ability to be reasonably logical and observant.
    .
    “(There is) lack of concentration, overconfidence and a certain level of selfishness, in general.” – Pau Gasol, after a game in which Kobe shot 9 of 31 from the field.
    .
    Just as example of Kobe’s teammates talking about selfishness on their team. Go ahead and TRY and say he is not talking about Kobe, that’ll make wonderful sense.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Asad, yeah that makes sense Larry Brown’s team of guys was more talented than the Lakers team of Hall of Famers with Phil Jackson as the coach. THAT’S WHY THEY LOST. BAHA, gtfoh.
    .
    They lost because Kobe and Shaq were both selfish, Kobe at the time, moreso.
    .
    Want proof?
    .
    -During the 2004 playoffs, Kobe shot 153 more field goals than Shaq over a 22 game span.
    And he only made eight more field goals total.
    .
    Fin.

  • AsadSaleh3

    People confuse selfishness with ego. Kobe’s ego is on another level than any other player because of the work he puts in, what he’s accomplished and what he’s striving for. I’m actually not a Lakers fan. I just watch guys play. Gasol would have room to talk and be almost believable if he was known for being aggressive at all times and acted like he wants to dominate when he’s on the floor, but he’s not. If Derek Fisher made comments about Kobe, I’d pay attention to them. Not Pau Gasol who as we speak is disappearing from the current series they’re playing.

  • AsadSaleh3

    No, nbk. They lost because as I said, the Pistons were a more complete team. Read carefully son. I didn’t say they were more talented. They played better together. No alpha dog. Great defensive team with a great PG leading them.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    whatever dude, focus on me misusing a word then the actual point. that’s what matters.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    The Lakers had a better team. Better players, better coach. They lost because the selfish nature of their two best players tore the team apart from the inside out. They didn’t lose because they were over-matched. If Kobe and Shaq put their selfishness or egos (whatever you want to call it, it’s the same thing on the court) aside they would have won the title. And they would have probably won 6 or 7 of them instead of 3.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    The 2004 Lakers lost to a team they had no business losing to because Kobe took and missed damn near twice as many shot as Shaq. Simple as that.

  • FrankO

    Pau Gasol disappearing in the playoffs? Again? I read somwhere that NBA players’s annual salary is based on games played during the regular season, no wonder Pau and Bynum take the playoffs off, maybe we the fans should make a donation to the starving useless Laker’s big men. Maybe that will motivate them. and can some please tell Sessions to “PLEASE” take a shot when he is open.
    Young man don’t be affraid of failure, take a page from Kobe’s book: If at first you don’t succeed, SHOOT IT AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN …

  • uhh

    NBK

    KOBE is the man you’re jealous you not as good as him so you sit here and rant about him to make yourself feel like more of a man.. bynum is kobes b**** sometimes he listens sometimes he needs to be scolded

  • http://bleacherreport nikita johnson-woods

    I want to give a shout out to the person name “Jaideveon” for giving his post on the game 6 tragedy I too commented on the holier than thou clowns in this world who always talk loud and say nothin’ I love Kobe for his wisdom and high IQ in this game of basketball and I love his supreme being for not following victim to these idiotic opinions people who tend to say sh** that could stop up any toilet!I can not even comment on what the real is because you my friend did it with class and beautiful articulation so anyone who caught a glimpse of your post today kick rocks and get yourself a new player to play on-peace

  • http://www.google.com/imgres?q=brian+scalabrine&um=1&hl=en&sa=N&biw=712&bih=572&tbm=isch&tbnid=paNXJ6FIB-hVJM:&imgrefurl=http://www.2ksports.ca/2012/04/30/brian-scalabr LakeShow

    Kobe’s 2004 Finals>LeBron’s 2011 Finals. Just sayin :)
    I’ll always respect selfishness in the form of trying to win over selflessness in the form of being passive and letting your team mates try to carry you.
    That’s just me though. You guys don’t need to respect that.

  • Ellis

    Anybody that says kobe is more isnterested in scoring than winning really has no clue about what he’s all about. If you looked at the game last night the bigs got touches on the 1st 5 possesions and the lakers were down 13-0! What would you have done in that situation? The bigs have gotten the ball on numerous occasions with mismatches and have done nothing but give the ball back to kobe who with the shot clock winding down has no choice but to shoot a contested shot!

  • PnoyVibe

    JaiDaveon makes most of these comments look illiterate

  • abaci

    speaking of LeBron congrats on his MVP this year

  • PnoyVibe

    ^Well deserved MVP this season

  • lisamarienurse

    Hi fellow fans. Bynum has stated that he is open and he is not given the ball. I was watching for that last night and it looked to be a fact at times, hopefully that will change tonight. If he gets the ball near the net he seems to get it into the net, let’s cheer these guys on tonight, big time. As for Pau, I do beleive he will try his best, he seems to get upset when he is beat up and the referees don’t notice. Let’s all have a positive thought their way tonight, GO LAKERS!!!!

  • http://www.google.com/imgres?q=brian+scalabrine&um=1&hl=en&sa=N&biw=712&bih=572&tbm=isch&tbnid=paNXJ6FIB-hVJM:&imgrefurl=http://www.2ksports.ca/2012/04/30/brian-scalabr LakeShow

    Agreed.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Red

    Asad is the most annoying & unknowable commentator on this site. But yea wait for Slam to post about his MVP tomorrow lol. Bynum’s immaturity is reminiscent of high school. This dude does NOT care that he’s being an idiot. Oh & LBJ did deserve it but he’s still a prick.

  • Terry

    Dagger,
    Come on…both the bigs played like they’d been smoking some high powered herb just before tip off. Sure it matters about touches etc.. but come on man, I didn’t see either of them get aggressive enough or energized enough where the rest of the team would have trusted them all that much with the ball.
    Bynum spends way to much energy on his disinterested facial expressions, while we know that inside he’s really throwing a tantrum every time he’s made to look bad by an opposing player!
    If both these guys played with some real heart, and put some “man” in their hands when handling the ball, we’d forgive them when the ball doesn’t fall, but these guys, especially Bynum, acts like he couldn’t give a rats ass if they’re winning or losing, especially when they’re losing bad…..??? Like he doesn’t have a care in the world!
    I think Kobe and the rest of the team should stick their big size shoes so far up his butt that he chokes, maybe then he’ll start realizing that the games/playoffs/Lakers aren’t all about Andrew Bynum, and that he’s gonna have to pay some dues to get the respect he thinks he deserves!!!!!!

  • bakers’-dozen

    George Karl is outcoaching Mike Brown. The alternating defensive looks he’s throwing at the Lakers have Mike Brown (and his post players) confused. As long as Mozgov doens’t get into early foul trouble, Denver is in good shape. He pushes back on Bynum and doesn’t back down. Bynum doenst’ like to get pushed…makes him frustrated. When he gets frustrated, he throws up bad shots. Then McGee comes in and starts blocking him all over the place. I’m loving it.

  • http://www.cox.com Marilyn

    AHH, it’s lonely at the top…People cheer you on to fame and when you get there they rip and tear at you to bring you down. What creatures we be!!! I say, who cares how the championship is won…They ( LAKERS )will all be the champions when they win. You do what NEEDS to be done to win. If that means the best shooter has to take over the ball to get the job done then thats how it goes down. These other players have chances to make a name for themselves for the postion they are chosen to play. If they don’t play it well…then what other team would pick them. What are they going to tell a new coach..”i’m really a good TEAM player, I just want to have more attention.” PLEASE. Either s#^t or get off the pot. Leave your EGO at your mammas.Your too old for breast feeding.MAN UP!!

  • curtis paggett

    I saw a lot of times in game six Bynum and Hill was open and Kobe took a bad shot Session,Blake,Ebanks and Barns passe up far to many shots.Coach needs to get McRoberts in the game.Lets face it Lakers are better when Kobe shoots less

  • robb

    Kobe tried to get his teammates involved yesterday, but they played like a bunch of cowards, nobody wanted to take a shot, or play any D. It was infuriating to see Kobe playing through gastroenteritis, dehydrated and tired and those two heartless idiots didn’t give a sh*t. After the first minutes of the third quarter I just couldn’t watch anymore.

  • jayrose

    #screwyouguysimgoinghome

  • http://www.kb24.com The Seed

    Kobe played with heart, anybody knocking him for his game is nothing but a HATER. Sessions and Barnes was scared to shoot when getting the ball from double teams. Bynum was getting pushed off the block and Pau was just talking jumpshots. No Hustle on Defense. The thing is, Kobe can have a shot at another ring if Bynum plays DEFENSE, control middle and Pau actually tries to post up. BOOK IT!!

  • jlc

    Trade Paul Gasol and get Mark Gasol, Paul aint doing it, is someone banging his girl again????And bynum WTF we should of just kept odom…People complain about kobe but it seem like the rest of the so called team didnt want to do anything with the ball 5-2 second left and they pass it to kobe…

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Lebron had a horrid series against the Mavs but killed the rest of the playoffs. How did Kobe have a better year in 2004? By what measure? Weird comment.

  • Bruce

    Asad:
    Interesting that you should bring up the point that Kobe’s leadership style is modeled after Jordan’s. You’ve watched Kobe enough that it should be obvious that Kobe’s whole game and persona is modeled after Jordan’s. Trouble is that the teams Jordan played on and the teams Kobe has played on were not that similar and didn’t have similar needs.
    While Kobe may have thought he was modeling Mike’s leadership style, Mike did not call out or criticize teammates in the press like Kobe does. I don’t recall him throwing teammates under the bus or blaming them like Kobe has done with Shaq,Bynum,Gasol and others. Mike was concerned with his own game but was not prone to criticize teammates through the press like Kobe. Mike would talk to the teammates in private if he had a problem with them,not embarrass them in public or blame them like Kobe does routinely.
    Mike played on a team certainly as talented as the ones Kobe played on,but very different in makeup of the talent. Mike never played with the top big men in the league on his team. He did play with highly skilled defensive players who were not nearly as skilled offensively as the bigs that Kobe has been gifted with. As a result,it was necessary in order to win for Mike to score a lot of points and he did so. He averaged over 30 points per game,but did so shooting 50% from the field(outstanding for a shooting guard who had to carry a big part of the offensive burden). The other big scorer was Scottie Pippen who was an outstanding defensive player and very athletic,similar in those respects to Mike. The rest of team was mostly role players. Mediocre bigs and players like Rodman,Grant,Kerr etc. who were important players to the team defense and in Kerr’s case a great spot up shooter. Excellent role players and their roles were important to team success.
    Kobe on the other hand had bigs who dominated the paint and were efficient scorers(percentagewise more efficient than Kobe). He scores about 25 points per game but at a 45% rate (slightly above average for a shooting guard,but nothing outstanding). Shaq and Bynum are close to 60% and Gasol mid fifties. No need for Kobe to shoot so much and waste so much clock time and inhibit ball movement like he does. In many games his personal need to be the high scorer actually makes his team less efficient on offense.
    As for the other resemblance to Mike,making scary faces and sticking his jaw and tongue out like Mike does not make him Michael. Yes,Michael is obviously Kobe’s idol,but their teams were different and what Michael did for his team that was not a particularly strong offensive team,especially on the front line is different from what Kobe should have done with the strong front lines he has played with.
    That said,since Michael seems to be your model for Kobe,Michael though his style fit his team,was not one of the great team players I’ve seen either. He took care of his business which enhanced team success with the team he was on. As team players who created team unity with their style of play and personality,I consider guys like Bird,Duncan,Magic,Kareem and Russell to be superior to both Michael and Kobe. They encouraged and supported teammates and didn’t need the limelight as much as Kobe and Michael. I seldom saw their teams lose games because they missed inadvisable shots. Kobe has many games where in trying to pad stats he snatches defeat from the jaws of victory. Michael not so much,but I’ve seen him do it too.

  • Kareem

    Bruce, comment more often. You’ve got great points.

  • Everynowhere

    @allenp he said 2004 Nba finals. Also it amazes me how laker fans can just block out the 2004 finals. Kobe has gotten much better and less selfish as of late but don’t pretend he isn’t the biggest reason why they lost against Detroit. Phil Jackson just loves throwing around the word “uncoachable” to all his players.

  • Everynowhere

    @bruce you need to take your hater glasses off. Don’t pretend that Kobe didn’t lead his team to back 2 back chips. Kobe haters can be just as ridiculous as his fans. The fans ignore all his faults while the haters ignore his accomplishments hahaha. I’m gonna miss Kobe when he retires…

  • Bob

    Kobe played well, but the image that he wants to acknowledge about him is his greatness. MJ, Magic, Bird, etc were greats because they LED their teams, they wouldn’t accept what is happening right now. LA needs a group sports psychologist. I say Kobe is right about having the mindset to be above what the other man can do, that is the champions mindset. However, you have to instill that in your teammates. For example, Byron Scott was not an exceptional talent, he was good. In the framework of the Showtime Lakers, he learned what it took to be a champion from Magic. That whole team played as one, and were confident that no one could beat them when they played the they should. Now, Byron has taken teams to the Finals and has the ability to teach champion fundamentals (which are different from fundamentals)

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Asad fu*k you you don’t know sh*t a$shole

  • http://www.triplejunearthed.com/dacre Dacre

    That was the kind of Corey Brewer DALLAS would love to have back… : )

  • http://kb24.com Bigi

    “ALL I SAID I LIKED THE PEN…”

  • Bruce

    Everynowhere:
    You are right to an extent. I don’t personally hate Kobe,but I do hate the kind of team and brand of basketball that is the product of Kobe’s individual needs. Believe me,Kobe is more about individual attention than he is about winning or team basketball. Put him on a team with dominating bigs and he’s a “champion” and a “competitor” which is the image he projects. Put him with average players and he is Pete Maravich,Allen Iverson or World B Free. His stats(other than shooting percentage) will be off the charts,but he’s stuck in the first round of the playoffs at best. He’s amazing in individual talent(no one can dispute that),but my point with Kobe is that his personality and need for individual attention and “greatness” trump even his desire to win titles. The end result is teammates can win,but they don’t thrive when playing with Kobe. The “nut cases” like World Peace and Bynum go extra crazy because Kobe doesn’t take the time to develop a real relationship. While I think World Peace respects Kobe,I think Bynum resents him and it affects his play. I can’t help but laugh at Bynum taking that three point shot and telling everyone to go to he–. Think about it,Kobe who has made about 30% of them this year takes them at will and no one has the guts to complain. Sure there is a difference,Kobe makes some important ones and makes them,but he also takes them with 20 point leads to pad his stats when he should either be on the bench or helping other teammates develop confidence by setting them up.
    For all his zaniness,Rodman was always productive with the Bulls and accepted his role,because of his respect for Mike and Phil. He was not dysfunctional at times like Bynum,World Peace while playing with Mike,although he was when with other teams at times. As for guys like Duncan,Magic,Russell,and Kareem,I cannot remember players rebelling against them or being dysfunctional around them like they are when being around Kobe for any length of time. World Peace and Bynum are simply being themselves,but Kobe’s behavior(the whining on every call he gets or doesn’t get,playing for himself,posturing for the press while criticizing teammates) sets a tone that makes it more natural for World Peace and Bynum to do what they do.
    You can’t be “do as I say,not as I do” if you want to be a real leader,you have to be a leader at all times.Compare Kobe to true leaders like Duncan(yes he does complain about calls,but never downs teammates),Magic,Russell,Bird and Kareem. You never saw their teammates being resentful toward them or dysfunction occurring around them like you have seen with Kobe’s teammates through the years. They won and got their attention through team play and team building,not individual greatness although they were and are truly great. You don’t have to score 30 points per game to be great,Russell and Magic didn’t even average 20 ppg during their careers,but they were great teammates. Kobe is not. He is individually great but not an asset to enhancing the abilities of teammates.

  • Malama

    The Lakers need TWO balls: One for Kobe and one for Kobe’s EGO

  • tyler

    @ asad are you serious your last comment made no sense, jordan did make his teammates better? he brought the best out of each one of them horace grant, scottie pippen, tony kukoc, b.j. armstrong, bill cartwright, all thrived with jordan on defense and offense hell ron harper even rejuvanated his career when he joined the bulls just like bynum gasol odom fisher ariva smush parker kobe brought out the best in them and not to mention ariza big fat contract from houston

  • http://www.kb24.com The Seed

    Bruce
    you are an idiot, obivously you need to learn more about MJ, MJ wanted scoring titles and tried to average 30 a game on purpose. Kobe is not a leader because Bynum and Pau don’t work on Defense and post moves get shut down sometimes and are not willing to work. Kobe got his team to 3 straight Finals and won back to back and could have had a 3peat if Gasol step up, but Kobe is not a Leader, MJ is not the Leader everyone acts like he was. Pippen wanted to leave, some of his teammates hated him, Grant left because of him and MJ, never game Pippen credit until after he was don playing, to HOW MUCH PIPPEN WAS IMPORTANT TO ALL OF HIS RINGS. MJ DID not win a ring without PIPPEN, Folks and MJ never played with a dominate BIG, so his field goal percentage will be higher, he was the BULLS best POST PLAYER. MJ gets all the love and is the same player as KOBE. ONLY dummies think Kobe doesn’t care about winning. No Bull ever RESENTED MJ getting all the attention and he acted like he always won by himself, man I watched every Bulls game growing up, He was different in how he dealt with people, Rodman stated he never talked to MJ, So how did MJ lead Rodman. MJ GreatNESS is overblown, like he always trusted his teammates and made every right play. NOPE, Duncan complains and cries about every call. Also Ginobli is the lynchpin to those rings along with Parker. Parker was named FInals MVP. If San Antino wins again, Parker will have two FINALS MVP. Kobe has made players look better, Shannon Brown and Ariza got better under Kobe, they have said it and Bynum talks about how he is motivated by Bryant’s greatness and Pau was not consider one of the best skilled big man in the league until getting to the Lakers. BOOK IT!!

  • Bruce

    Seed:
    I don’t think you will see anywhere in my post that I said MJ was a great leader,but the evidence is there that the players who played with MJ knew and fulfilled their roles very well. I give Phil a lot of credit for that,but they obviously respected MJ in that they accepted the secondary roles because they had confidence in Michael and Phil. Scottie who was the second main scoring force on that team got enough shots to average 20 or close to it points while playing with Michael. I don’t think his percentage was as high as Mike’s but it was probably higher than Kobe’s while he played with Mike. It may or may not have been higher in the years he played without Mike.The point is Mike had no bigs who were a scoring threat anywhere near Gasol and Shaq. Bynum is a threat too although he has been limited somewhat by his immaturity and Kobe’s need to dominate the offense.
    As for Mike,when you shoot over 50% from the field(i.e. Mike,Bynum,Gasol and Shaq) it is a positive for your team if you take enough shots to score 30 points and people who do that should be the first option on offense. No team averages near 50% from the field. Having big men who can score should help take the pressure off the shooting guard and should help the shooting guard get better shots and thus a higher percentage. Mike never had that advantage,Kobe has had it about 14 years out of his 16 year career. Instead of utilizes his bigs,Kobe has competed with them to be team scoring leader rather than taking advantage of
    how those bigs could make things way easier for everyone. In real world basketball you take the highest percentage shots you can get. Kobe’s lifetime fg% is 45%(43% this year),if you match that with the seasons he has played,I’M pretty sure you will find his fg% is below the Laker team average most seasons. Do you really want the guy whose fg% is below the team average taking way more shots than the guys making over half their shots? Do you want a guy shooting 43% trying to win a scoring championship at the expense of team unity and performance?
    I don’t know if Michael was out to win scoring championships or not and it is irrelevant if you are making 50% of your shots. Scoring 30 points a game is a good thing if you shoot a percentage that high because you are not taking shots away from more efficient players. On the other hand,if you are shooting 43% and scoring 28 points per game it’s not the most efficient use of your offensive possessions. For comparison Durant and LeBron both were over 50%(highest on their respective teams) and Durant scored slightly more than Kobe and LeBron who took the least shots was within one point of both of them.
    Lastly,real leadership doesn’t come from scoring a lot of points(i.e. Duncan,Magic,Russell,Fisher). It comes from having the welfare of others and the team first. Teammates can pick up on that. They will perform when they have confidence in their leaders. An atmosphere of drama and dysfunction exists when you try to lead by calling out and dissing teammates through the press. Do you think Tim Duncan really cares if Ginobili or Parker gets more ink as long as the Spurs win? Kobe in the past has shown he would rather lose than let Shaq get a 4th finals MVP and win? He almost lost another title(lucky for him Perkins was injured) in 2010 when he insisted on chucking up 6 for 24 in the deciding game and Gasol and Ron World Peace bailed him out with their defense and clutch play .
    In the end there are two things that win titles. Those two are talent and team play and attitude. Talent can overcome a lot of things(even Kobe ball hogging),but team play is even better because it is more consistent and you can rely on it more. Given the amount of talent Kobe has had on his teams,five titles in 15 seasons isn’t all that impressive. When you get talent and team play utilized to maximize everyone’s skills you have done the best you can do. Kobe still thinks he can do it by himself, and that is not the ticket.

  • http://www.kb24.com The Seed

    ^^^^SO all the talent Bird and Magic and MJ had isn’t that impressive too right. Magic and Bird played with 3 or more HoFAmers and MJ played with 2 or more HoFamers. Kobe has played with 1 HoFamers and Pau is a borderline Hall of Famer. Check it. BOOK IT!!

  • Royalty KT

    Kobe’s Godly gifts, gruling work eithics and his will to win has enabled him to accomplish just about every individual or team award the game of basketball has offer in his 16 years of service.

  • Malama

    Game seven: To prove my point, when Kobe lets everybody play WE WIN. Even Harrington said it in a post game interview after the Denver loss…………

  • Bruce

    Malama:
    You are right on the money. The Lakers play their best basketball(any team does)when the basketball and the players are moving and all of the players are involved. People get open shots and even Kobe himself said,these guys are pros. Any pro should make those shots. The bigs were more aggressive,but the biggest change of all for the Lakers was that Kobe took what was given to him and in my memory,not once in the whole game do I remember him not having one possession when he sat on the ball and overdribbled or pump faked on the perimeter to get a one on one move while open teammates stood around watching him,killing the possession for the Lakers. He didn’t always have a pass leading directly to a basket,but he openly and willingly made the quick,safe pass that led to another pass that started the ball movement that eventually led to a basket. He played smart basketball and played to win rather than to be the top scorer as he most often does. One other thing Kobe did to win was to switch defensively onto Ty Lawson when Ty was destroying the Lakers in the comeback. Ty was pretty much shut down for the rest of the game,allowing the Lakers to come back and win.
    Kobe actually was a leader by example in what an untrained basketball fan(many Kobe lovers fit that description)would say was a bad game for Kobe because he only scored 17 points on 7 for 16 shooting,but his willingness to follow the game plan and to accept a lesser role and involve teammates was a big key to victory. If Kobe had done what Kobe often does and tried to outscore Denver by himself, there is no doubt in my mind that the Nuggets would have taken the resulting turnovers and missed shots and run them down the Lakers throats for easy baskets. Indeed the beginning of the Denver comeback was Kobe getting a layup blocked and Denver running it back for an easy basket and right after that a turnover by Kobe that led to another Denver fast break bucket. After that,Kobe went back to team basketball mode and being a part of a good team offense where everyone participated.
    One telling statement after the game by Mike Brown was that he and Gasol had a conversation between games when Brown told Gasol to be aggressive(not that he needed to,Gasol is one of the most intelligent players in the NBA,as is Kobe by the way although kobe often doesn’t use that intelligence in the team concept) and to set picks for Kobe and if Kobe waves him off,to ignore Kobe and do it anyway. Kind of a subtle telling piece of advice to not be passive and stand aside while Kobe tries to control the game and run his own offense. The results were great.

Advertisement