The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players.
by Quinn Peterson
For whatever reason, three is a funny number. A special number.
While Derrick Rose rocks number “1,” and comes in at No. 12 on the SLAMonline Top 50, this will be his third year in the L. And as the saying goes, “The third time’s the charm.”
When you do something the first time, you’re just feeling things out, getting accustomed to them. By the second time, you’ve begun to make adjustments. But by the third time, y
ou develop a sense of comfort, making a few minor tweaks to ensure that a fine-tuned product runs as smoothly as possible.
That’s where DRose is right now.
After an accolade-filled career at Simeon Career Academy in Chicago, and an epic year at Memphis (vacated or not, we all saw what happened), Rose was taken by the Bulls with the No. 1 overall pick in the 2008 Draft, and officially became the Prince of the Chi.
The dilemma of attaining great success is that it breeds even greater expectations. It births a hype that, many times, can never be lived up to. Thus far however, Pooh has met — or exceeded — much, if not all, of that hype. We’ve seen players grow complacent and conceited, and never progress as once predicted.
But unlike some of his peers and predecessors, Rose’s work ethic has him in position to become the best point guard in the League. He may not be there yet, but given the improvements he’s made already, the title really isn’t that far-fetched.
His inaugural season was a successful one to say the least, even winning the Skills Challenge during All-Star weekend. Playing 81 games — and starting 80 — Rose averaged 16.8 points (second among all rookies) and 6.3 assists (first among all rookies), earning All-Rookie First Team and ROY honors.
Come playoff time, on the big time stage against The League OGs (Boston), he took his game to new heights, including that memorable Game 1 in which he went off for 36. He raised his scoring to just over 19 points per game, while dishing out 6.4 assists and pulling down 6.3 boards. Despite losing the series, they pushed the then-defending champs to Game 7, and made a statement that was heard throughout the League.
Last year, with Ben Gordon gone and no real go-to scoring option, he would again have to step his game up. And he did, to the tune of 20.8 points per game. His assists would hold steady at just about six a game. In the Playoffs he again turned his game up another notch, averaging 26 and 7 dimes. Even LeBron James would struggle to keep young Rose in front.
En route, he gave us one of the illest dunks of the season, baptizing Goran Dragic. More importantly, he started to show increasing confidence in his mid-range jumper. That had been the knock on him since he came into the League. He could beat anybody off the dribble, but “he can’t shoot”.
Well last year, starting from day one, he addressed the issue, showing gradual, steady improvement. Knocking it down coming off the pick and roll, pulling up or going one on one. He wasn’t Sam Cassell, but it was coming along.
This year, coming off an impressive run with Team USA, expect more of the same. In Turkey and on tour with the national team, he showed off his jumper and a floater with seemingly unlimited range.
If his jumper continues to improve the way in the way it has, he’ll literally be unguardable. Step up, and he blows by you. Sag, and he drops you off. It’s that simple.
He has as much room for “promotion” as anyone else on this list. Already, confidence has begun to reign supreme. The once soft-spoken PG has begun to come out of his shell.
With (virtually) a new team (certainly the best he’s had since coming to the L), new coach and even a brand new signature shoe, the third time is definitely looking like the charm for Derrick Rose.
| SLAMonline TOP 50 PLAYERS | OVERALL RANK | POSITION RANK | ||||
| Player | Team | Position | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 |
| Ray Allen | Celtics | SG | 50 | 36 | 10 | 9 |
| Gilbert Arenas | Wizards | SG | 49 | 34 | 9 | 8 |
| Lamar Odom | Lakers | PF | 48 | 33 | 14 | 10 |
| John Wall | Wizards | PG | 47 | NR | 13 | NR |
| OJ Mayo | Grizzlies | SG | 46 | 46 | 8 | 12 |
| Al Horford | Hawks | C | 45 | NR | 6 | NR |
| Jason Kidd | Mavs | PG | 44 | 45 | 12 | 10 |
| Joakim Noah | Bulls | C | 43 | NR | 5 | NR |
| LaMarcus Aldridge | Blazers | PF | 42 | 39 | 13 | 12 |
| David West | Hornets | PF | 41 | 31 | 12 | 8 |
| Monta Ellis | Warriors | SG | 40 | NR | 7 | NR |
| Andrew Bogut | Bucks | C | 39 | NR | 4 | NR |
| Yao Ming | Rockets | C | 38 | NR | 3 | NR |
| Brandon Jennings | Bucks | PG | 37 | NR | 11 | NR |
| Zach Randolph | Grizzlies | PF | 36 | NR | 11 | NR |
| Stephen Curry | Warriors | PG | 35 | NR | 10 | NR |
| David Lee | Warriors | PF | 34 | NR | 10 | NR |
| Brook Lopez | Nets | C | 33 | NR | 2 | NR |
| Gerald Wallace | Bobcats | SF | 32 | NR | 7 | NR |
| Manu Ginobili | Spurs | SG | 31 | 29 | 6 | 7 |
| Tony Parker | Spurs | PG | 30 | 15 | 9 | 3 |
| Kevin Garnett | Celtics | PF | 29 | 13 | 9 | 3 |
| Rudy Gay | Grizzlies | SF | 28 | 44 | 6 | 9 |
| Josh Smith | Hawks | PF | 27 | 40 | 8 | 13 |
| Andre Iguodala | 76ers | SG | 26 | 26 | 5 | 6 |
| Al Jefferson | Jazz | PF | 25 | 23 | 7 | 7 |
| Russell Westbrook | Thunder | PG | 24 | NR | 8 | NR |
| Chauncey Billups | Nuggets | PG | 23 | 19 | 7 | 5 |
| Tyreke Evans | Kings | PG | 22 | NR | 6 | NR |
| Danny Granger | Pacers | SF | 21 | 21 | 5 | 5 |
| Carlos Boozer | Bulls | PF | 20 | 32 | 6 | 9 |
| Paul Pierce | Celtics | SF | 19 | 17 | 4 | 4 |
| Joe Johnson | Hawks | SG | 18 | 20 | 4 | 4 |
| Rajon Rondo | Celtics | PG | 17 | 27 | 5 | 8 |
| Amar’e Stoudemire | Knicks | PF | 16 | 16 | 5 | 6 |
| Steve Nash | Suns | PG | 15 | 22 | 4 | 6 |
| Tim Duncan | Spurs | PF | 14 | 6 | 4 | 1 |
| Chris Bosh | Heat | PF | 13 | 13 | 3 | 4 |
| Derrick Rose | Bulls | PG | 12 | 18 | 3 | 4 |
Notes
• Rankings are based solely on projected ’10-11 performance.
• Contributors to this list include: Jeremy Bauman, Maurice Bobb, Erildas Budraitis, Sean Ceglinsky, Ben Collins, Bryan Crawford, Sandy Dover, Adam Figman, Manny Maduakolam, Eddie Maisonet, Ryne Nelson, Doobie Okon, Ben Osborne, Charles Peach, Branden Peters, Quinn Peterson, David Schnur, Todd Spehr, Kyle Stack, Adam Sweeney, Dennis Tarwood, Tracy Weissenberg, Lang Whitaker, Eric Woodyard, and Nima Zarrabi.
• Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.
LATEST NEWS & RUMORS
View all »- SLAM Radio: Epitaphs Out East
- Avery Bradley to Undergo Season-Ending Shoulder Surgery
- Jeff Van Gundy Blasts Orlando Magic for Handling of Stan Van Gundy’s Firing
- JR Smith Arrested in Miami Due to License, Then Released
- Kicks: Derrick Williams’ Birthday Sneaker Scavenger Hunt
- Are the Orlando Magic Ready to Trade Dwight Howard?
- Layup Lines: Survival of the Fittest
- Video: Dwyane Wade Was Proud to Wear Hot Pink Pants
- Russell Westbrook Still Bothered By 42 Points Tony Parker Scored on Him
- View All »


@ JTrailer a prime JKidd vs Rose? Listen stop putting legends up against younger pro’s people tend to look at the legends entire career and base judgments off that. A prime Kidd wouldn’t get the assists your dreaming of because the Bulls didn’t have good shooters. Rose is a guy who does what is asked of him. Think about it
Personally, I don’t think 12 is outlandish for Rose given his talent, but we shall see if this is the year that it all comes together. Often when players improve their jumpshots, they start settling more for jumpers instead of dictating to the defense. I was impressed with Rose early on in FIBA play, but then he started to slump and that bothered me. I think he’s still learning the game to a large extent and now he’s going to be dealing with a lot more pressure and expectations. It could push him to higher heights, or it could cause him to start pressing.
There is a big diffence between those rebounding and assist numbers.
The difference between 9.7 rebounds and 6.3 rebounds is the difference between a power forward and weak rebounding small forward. The difference between 9.8 assists and 6.4 assists is the difference between Deron Williams at the point guard and Allen Iverson at the point guard as far as passing goes.
17 points compared to 20 points is a nice difference, no doubt, but when your point guard is scoring 17, rebounding like a power forward and passing like and elite point guard, he’s abusing whoever is guarding him. That’s just obvious.
Rose had a nice series, but his numbers don’t compare to Rondo’s. Particularly when you consider that Rose averaged FIVE turnovers a game, while Rondo averaged fewer than three and tacked on 2.5 steals a game that playoffs.
You know, these stats are actually skewed in Rose’s favor because Rondo’s numbers are from the playoffs as a whole, while Rose’s numbers are only from that one series. And that series was actually Rondo’s best series of the playoffs, so his numbers were probably better against the Bulls than the ones we’re working from.
He abused Rose. Come on now.
Rose averaged 19.1 points, 9.3 rebounds and 11.6 assists.
On 45 percent shooting with 2.7 steals a game.
He abused Derrick Rose. Rose did his thing, but he got abused by Rondo.
You can’t back away from stats now homie. That’s what we were using.
And using the “eye test” I thought Rose was crazy inconsistent after going off in the first game and that he made just as many mistakes as good plays. And the stats back that up.
You can’t say the numbers are an anomaly. That’s like pointing to KG’s scoring average in the Cavs series as an anomaly because he didn’t do that the rest of the playoffs. We all know that his scoring average jumped against the Cavs because he straight up abused Antawn Jamison, just like Rondo gave Rose the business which is why his scoring average was so high compared to his scoring average int he the other series.
I mean, Rondo, a non-scorer, averaged 19 points a game and damn near 12 assists! the 10 boards are just icing after that. There is no way you can honestly say that Rondo should be giving any point guard 19 points and 12 assists given his obvious offensive issues.
Rose did pretty good for a rookie on offense.
He got abused on defense. Ain’t no shame in that, it happens to everybody sometimes.
I’ve never really liked his game, but clearly, he outplayed Rose in those 7 games, no question about it.
Finally, Iverson is not an unwilling passer. He’s just shoot first, which is exactly what D-Rose was his first year in the league.
You don’t average 7 assists being an “unwilling” passer.
My point was that Deron Williams makes point guard passes, while Iverson makes scorer passes. That was the same thing that was happening with Rose and Rondo.
Will Chicago trade Rose for Rondo? NEVER!!
Rajon Rondos playoff stats with a HOF team vs a ROOKIE PG are useless. The bottom line is that was 2 YEARS AGO!!! Rose is better then Rondo now and he proves that everytime they met.
His assist number are low because the Bulls count on him so much to finish plays. If he doesn’t score, they dont’ have a chance at winning.
With that being said, having Boozer, Brewer and Korver there will allow him to be more of a distributor this year.
Rondo runs screen roll on everybody. He never isos people up. And most people do not allow him to score 20 a game. In fact, the only other time I can remember that happening was against Mo Williams this past season, and we all know that MO got his cheeks opened by Rondo.
According to the stats, Rose got abused. According to my eye test, he couldn’t stop Rondo at all.
Bottom line, as a rookie point guard in his first playoffs series, Rose got abused by a veteran.
There is no shame in that, but that’s what happened.
@JTrailer and all you other fools looking at stats from 2 years ago. Look at the most up to date stats. If the best you can do is justify Rondo being better because what he did to a rookie 2 years ago then shame on you. I know what my eyes seen last year when they met head to head. And I definitely know what the stats say. The stats show Rose getting a career high and sitting Rondo on the bench.
2. The stats say that Rondo averaged 19 points per game, on 45 percent shooting, with 11.6 assists and 9.3 rebounds and 2.7 steals. He also averaged about 2.7 turnovers.
Rose averaged 19.6 points on 49 percent shooting with 6.3 boards and 6.4 assists and 5 turnovers.
Those stats show a clear winner.
The fact that Rondo dropped 29! in Game One, followed by two triple doubles and then a 19 assist game only buttress that point.
And my eyes told me that D Rose could not stop Rondo from getting in the lane creating havoc. Not at all. That’s what I call abuse, but maybe my definition is different.
The discussion I engaged in was about whether Rose got “abused” by Rondo.
I have never said Rondo is better than Rose now, nor have I groused about his placement on the list. Look at my initial comment.
I just think that Rondo gave him the business when they matched up, and I think Rose’s defense is the biggest weakness in his game, followed by his jumper.
It’s weak to write off everybody who disagrees with you as a hater. It’s even weaker to introduce faulty stats into a discussion and then turnaround and call those stats unimportant when they are used to breakdown your argument. That’s what you’re doing.
Harry Twatter then said that the “abuse” never happened, and that Rondo has gotten “abused” by Rose numerous times.
Twatter also said it doesn’t matter since the alleged abuse happened two years ago.
He went on to post those erroneous playoff numbers which consider Rondo’s stats from the entire playoffs when his playoffs took a nosedive, instead of just his stats from the first round.
He then said stats don’t really matter and they are just being used by Boston bean heads.
Bryan Crawford and I have disagreed on the definition of “abused” and whether Rose deserves that label for his first playoffs series against a veteran.
Then again, that was only Rondo’s second time in the playoffs, so it’s not like he had THAT much more experience. I think Rose just played bad defense.
I think that Rondo did to Rose what he did to Mo Wiliams this past post season. Against Mo Williams he put up 20.7 points, 6.3 rebounds and 11.7 assists.
We all know that Rondo abused Williams. Is it just because Williams was bad on offense, or because Rondo straight up dominanted him when he had the ball?
Nah, homie. We were talking about stats. I pointed out that the stats were the wrong numbers. Your stats were from the playoffs as a whole instead of from Round 1. You can find those stats by using the sortable individual stats tool at NBA. com.
Using those numbers, the gap in scoring pretty much disappears, the gap in assits damn near doubles and reboudning gap is still there.
Not to mention the five turnovers for Rose.
So, going by stats, it wasn’t a close battle. Rondo clearly had the better series, which undermines your point.
I don’t understand why this is so hard to admit. But, it’s clear we aren’t going to have a meeting of minds on this, so I’m going to take NBK’s advice and stop repeating myself.
I make mad spelling errors on here.
I don’t make many logical errors.
Now, go on over to NBA. com, use the sortable stats tool I suggested, and see how much better Rondo played against Rose compared to everybody else he faced that playoffs.
Everybody knows the Celtics run pick and roll to get him shots.
Rondo does not average 20 points per game against everybody in the league.
I know why Rose sucked on defense. His fundamentals are horrible both on the ball and on pick and roll. Rondo exploited this.
Yet, in the very next round, Rondo would only average 15.5 points and 7.7 assists.
Why the massive drop in his numbers? Well, the overall team defense of his opponent was better, but he also went against a better individual defender who he did not just dominate.
Once again, I cited the numbers because you used the numbers as proof that the gap between the two players wasn’t that wide based on that stats.
In reality, Rose scored 19, Rondo scored 19. Rondo got 11 assists, Rose got 6. Rondo got 9 boards, Rose got 6. Rondo averaged 2.7 steals, Rose averaged .44. Rondo averaged 2 turnovers a game, Rose averaged 5.
You have said that the rebounding numbers don’t count because that’s an anomaly, not true since Rondo averaged 10 rebounds the round and put up insane rebounding numbers this playoffs.
You say the turnovers have to be overlooked because Rose is a rookie. He still had a turnover just about every time he had an assist.
You say the scoring doesn’t matter because Rondo used pick and roll. That ignores the fact that primary offense for the Bulls that year was high pick and roll for Rose.
Basically, you say that any statistic that proves that Rondo straight abused Rose doesn’t matter, while the fact that Rose scored 19 a game does matter.
What’s up with that?
If a player can’t guard the post, you put him the post and abuse him.
If a player can’t move his feet, you take him outside and abuse him.
You attack a player where he is weak, and dominate him.
Yes, just straight blowing by a man is worse, but if Rondo ups his scoring average that much against a player it’s not just about pick and roll. It’s about a bad defensive player.
The gap in assists, rebounds, turnovers and steals was canyon wide to you?
Hell, Rondo had an efficiency rating of 30 and Rose had one of 19!
Let’s look at the players you mentioned. You left off Noah and Brad Miller, by the way. Not sure you why you would leave off Noah given the way you’ve hyped dude in recent months as a player, and given the fact that he had the second highest efficiency rating the East that playoffs behind only Dwight Howard.
No matter.
For centers, Chicago had two players in the two ten in the East for efficiency ratings, Boston had one.
For forwards, chicago again had two players, Boston had two.
For guards, Boston had two players in the top ten, Chicago had three.
From what I can tell, there wasn’t a huge gap between the Boston talent and the chicago talent at least based on the way they played in that series.
Boston may have had a slight edge, but it wasn’t overwhelming. And much of that edge came because Rondo lived in the lane, killed on the glass and got everybody involved.
I use stats because stats were used. Clearly we have different thoughts on what stats mean. To me, 9 rebounds is a decent haul for apower forward, while 6 is ridiculously low.
For a point guard to get 9 boards, while aslo getting 11 assists and 19 points is freaking ridiculous. Those are ridiculous numbers.
ben gordon, salmons, noah, miller, hinrich, tyrus thomas
The gap is not huge and was not huge in that series. Rondo had better perimter players, but the cats on chicago’s team weren’t slouches, and Chicago clearly had an advantage with the big men.
That’s how I see it going by the stats, or going by the skillset.
Rondo: 14.7ppg, 10.3apg, 4.3rpg
Rose: 14.3ppg, 4.7apg, 2.3rpg ’09-10
Rondo: 9.2ppg, 10.8apg, 5.2rpg
Rose: 21.2ppg, 4.0apg, 4.5rpg I think that should settle it. But then again, this is SLAMonline…so it won’t settle anything. Still interesting to look at though.
The elite rebounders in the league get roughly anywhere from 11-14 boards a game.
The good rebounders typically get about 9-11 rebounds per game.
Mediocre is roughly 5-9 boards.
Now, depending on your position, the number of boards you get per game looks better.
A point guard who gets 6 boards a game looks outstanding, while a power forward who gets six boards looks wack.
Rajan Rondo was putting up point guard numbers that would have been “good” for a power forward, let alone a point guard. The difference isn’t just the three boards, the difference is what those three boards mean in context. In context, that’s a big freaking gap considering the rebounding trends in the NBA. That’s my point.
I’m not arguing Rondo is better now. I’m arguing he killed Rose that series, but clearly, you’re not going to agree with that argument. That’s fine.
But, it wasn’t because the stats weren’t obvious, it’s because you’ve decided that there is not a huge difference between 6 boards and 9 boards.
If Carmelo Anthony averaged 9 boards instead of the six he normally gets, people would be on his jock even more.
If Jeff Green averaged 9 boards instead of the 6 he normally gets, there would no question about OKC offering him an extension. In basketball circles, there is a massive difference between six boards and nine boards, it’s not just three rebounds.
Beyond that, I can’t really say anymore.
Rose : 20 ppg, 6 apg and 3.8 rpg
Rondo: 14 ppg, 10 apg, 4.5 rpg and an amazing 2.3 spg (with a ring i might add)
RAJON RONDO IS THE BETTER POINT GUARD
CONVERSATION CLOSED
Worse defender over the course of their career Iverson or Nash?
Iverson fairly poor early, improved under Larry Brown to about average, regressed after Brown left to very poor. He was always a ball hawk though and forced serious problems in the passing lanes his entire career to the point that if you didn’t account for him, he could create havoc.
Nash takes charges. He does this pretty well. Honestly, I don’t understand why Nash and Dirk struggle so much on defense. They have the physical tools and have had the tools their entire careers.
i think slam got it right last year, and i think they got it right this year. he’s gonna prove a lot of people wrong.
Flops are horrible.
Nash walks the line. He really walks the line.
And I agree that neither he nor Dirk really “want” to play great defense. That’s been my theory forever. I just think it’s strange how that isn’t seen are more of a problem, you know?
Rose is gonna ball
Who cares
because the Hate is gonna fall
Rose is going to dunk on you
Yes he do
Rose going to be leading his crew
BOOK IT!!!
But measuring this on stats from over a season ago (and with one of them being a rookie and the other one also only in his second postseason) is just plain trolling…
IF ROSE HAD THAT TEAM BOSTON WOULD HAVE WON SO YEAH DO ROSE IS ALL READY BETTER THAN RONDO ALL YEAH BETTER THE TEAM IS EASIER IT IS TO PLAY DEFENSE
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT!!!CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT I MEAN LIKE WHAT THE F… YES I AM BEING SARCASTIC FOR ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE ON THE VERGE OF BEING RETARDED.
In the future he will be one of the greatest point guards in the league with high potential. It’d be cool to see him win a ring but he needs a team and the 2010 – 2011 Bulls look good for this season.
Plus u r Slam personnel and I expect u 2 b kid of a moderator and not follow some commentors (like Eboy, my man JT21) in the gutter of insults and personal attacks were they sometimes go…
Anyway, just my opinion and I do believe that at this point, DRose and RR are not in the same league. RR is a good (sometimes great) PG, 2nd to 3rd man in a very talented and well managed team, while DRose is a franchise player.
@Caboose: That’s fine if you (or anyone else) agree with Allenp, I still don’t. My point remains that if you have to rely on assists and rebound numbers to solidify your case then that means either you have no case, or, the word “abuse” is used in the wrong context. Like I said, “dominant” would have been the more appropriate term to describe that battle between the two because in my mind, when you say that one player abused another, then that means he consistently outscored him while making it difficult for his counterpart to do anything. That didn’t happen and if anyone thinks it did, well, more power to them. They’re wrong…
LeBron
Wade
Carmelo
couldnt agree more!
Comments