Friday, October 19th, 2012 at 12:12 pm  |  53 responses

Top 50: LaMarcus Aldridge, no. 16

The definitive ranking of the NBA’s best players for ’12-13.

by Tracy Weissenberg / @basketballista

For a No. 2 draft pick, a lot of words are used to describe his potential success and expected dominance in the League. Patience is not usually one of them. While LaMarcus Aldridge may not have garnered the attention, minutes or stats, he immediately wanted—or that his selection in the Draft warranted—his willingness to wait has proven key.

It should be noted that Aldridge was drafted four spots ahead of Brandon Roy in 2006. His then-teammate quickly became the face of the Blazers on his way to winning Rookie of the Year. Soon, the phrase “bone-on-bone” became the norm in the Portland media, as Roy’s knees quickly deteriorated to force a lesser and lesser role on a team he once commanded. It was finally Aldridge’s turn.

Aldridge spoke to SLAMonline last season about the transition: “I went from being like Robin—trying to be Robin with Brandon Roy—to being Batman. From not really looked at as a closer of games to having to close the game, having to lead the team. It’s like day and night.”

Last season—Portland’s first full campaign without Roy—Aldridge scored 21.7 points and averaged 8 rebounds, which nearly matched his totals from the previous season. More impressively, Aldridge was the only player in the NBA last season to average at least 20 points, while shooting 50 percent from the field and 80 percent from the line.

Over the past few seasons, he has become more comfortable in the post, and a more versatile scorer. According to hoopdata.com, Aldridge connected on 43 percent of his attempts from 16-23 feet last season. In comparison, Blake Griffin connected on 37 percent of those same shots, while shooting guard Kobe Bryant hit 41 percent. It also should be noted that since Aldridge has been in the League, the Blazers rank 25th with 79.6 field-goal attempts per game. Fewer possessions equal fewer points and rebound opportunities, as the pace has easily shaped his offensive and defensive stats.

While Aldridge has been a steady promise for the Blazers, garnering accolades including his first All-Star appearance and an invitation to USA Basketball tryouts, the team as a whole is trying to rebound from a lackluster 28-38 record last season. It will be tough for Aldridge to live up to his No. 16 ranking, coming off hip surgery and playing for a team in transition.

As Aldridge continued to develop offensively, Portland’s guard situation has been anything but steady. At first, the ball was in Roy’s hands for Aldridge to play off of. In ‘10-11, Andre Miller ran the show, which Aldridge described as “my easiest year offensively because he was so smart and so good with the ball.” Last season, Ray Felton and Jamal Crawford were largely failed experiments for the Blazers, and this year the ball will be in the hands of rookie Damian Lillard. For a player trying to rank among the League’s premier—especially at his position—he may become frustrated on a struggling team.

While the Blazers may be a few years away from contending, Aldridge—27 and coming off his first All-Star campaign—has shown that he can be patient. The only question now is if he’s still willing to wait.


Where should LaMarcus Aldridge rank in the SLAMonline Top 50?

Loading ... Loading ...
SLAMonline Top 50 Players 2012
Rank Player Team Position Pos. Rank
50 Greg Monroe Pistons C 8
49 Tyreke Evans Kings PG 14
48 Brandon Jennings Bucks PG 13
47 Stephen Curry Warriors PG 12
46 Ricky Rubio TWolves PG 11
45 Al Jefferson Jazz PF 14
44 Anthony Davis Hornets PF 13
43 Serge Ibaka Thunder PF 12
42 Al Horford Hawks C 7
41 Ty Lawson Nuggets PG 10
40 Danny Granger Pacers SF 6
39 Tim Duncan Spurs PF 11
38 John Wall Wizards PG 9
37 Monta Ellis Bucks SG 8
36 Zach Randolph Grizzlies PF 10
35 Roy Hibbert Pacers C 6
34 Tyson Chandler Knicks C 5
33 Eric Gordon Hornets SG 7
32 Kevin Garnett Celtics PF 9
31 Manu Ginobili Spurs SG 6
30 Amar’e Stoudemire Knicks PF 8
29 Marc Gasol Grizzlies C 4
28 DeMarcus Cousins Kings C 3
27 Paul Pierce Celtics SF 5
26 Andre Iguodala Nuggets SG 5
25 Rudy Gay Grizzlies SF 4
24 Josh Smith Hawks PF 7
23 Derrick Rose Bulls PG 8
22 Joe Johnson Nets SG 4
21 Steve Nash Lakers PG 7
20 James Harden Thunder SG 3
19 Pau Gasol Lakers PF 6
18 Chris Bosh Heat PF 5
17 Kyrie Irving Cavs PG 6
16 LaMarcus Aldridge Blazers PF 4

Notes
• Rankings are based solely on projected ’12-13 performance.
• Contributors to this list include: Jake Appleman, Maurice Bobb, Rodger Bohn, Brendan Bowers, Franklyn Calle, David Cassilo, Bryan Crawford, Adam Figman, Eldon Khorshidi, Eddie Maisonet III, Ryne Nelson, Ben Osborne, Allen Powell II, Sam Rubenstein, Jonathan Santiago, Abe Schwadron, Leo Sepkowitz, Dave Spahn, Ben Taylor, Tzvi Twersky, Peter Walsh, Tracy Weissenberg, Yaron Weitzman, DeMarco Williams and Dave Zirin.
• Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • MrSuper

    Yep, better body and fundamentals on the defensive side. Plus a better passer as well. But he has his health issues (heart) and so we can’t be sure on his future development. Love has the potential to improve on D and is a bit younger. Right now though, all we can do is speculate.

  • http://twitter.com/beasleyfacebash ac

    I love LMA, one of my favorite players in the league. And, yes, he’s definitively a better defender than Love and a positive defender, for sure, but he isn’t a transformative defender, at least yet, and Love isn’t that bad of a defender anymore (he’s below-average in a vacuum, but getting to play in Adelman’s post-zone offense where he has set responsibilities that don’t overextend him allows him to be a Nowitzki-level defender–not good, but hovers around average/neutral).

    But his rebounding, even if we don’t compare it to Love’s (who in my book is the best rebounder in the league with Dwight a close second), is horrid. It’s like excruciatingly bad even if you consider the pace in which the Blazers play at and the rebounders he’s had to play next to (Camby and Wallace, mostly). It also doesn’t make sense because the dude is long as hell and should hypothetically be a monster on the board, but for whatever reason (it’s not that he has no effort I think he just doesn’t have the same effort as other rebounders do) he’s a really, really bad rebounder.

    You’re right about the post play, though. He was fantastic last year and I think it’s often overlooked just how freaking good he is in the post (and how little he is assisted on his shots).

    But he’s not a more efficientl player than Love.

    I think one of the biggest misconceptions about Love is that he’s an inefficient player and that mostly has to do with how poor of a statistic FG% is. Love gets close to half of his points from threes and free throws, which is why his FG% is so low. TS%, which includes the fact that three pointers are worth more than regular shots and FT%/quantity, shows that Love actually shoots 56.8% from the field. In contrast, Lamarcus shoots 56%. Love isn’t significantly more efficient, but he’s definitely not less efficient.

    I have Love is my 6th/7th best player simply because he’s upped his defensive game to the point that isn’t a liability anymore and that his offensive game is so, so transformative a la Dirk. His absolutely really, really good three point shooting and how often he shoots from there spaces the floor in a way that is only comparable to Dirk.

    I have LMA as my 10th best (because I’m a fan and incredibly biased, of course) simply because that rebounding is just really, really bad. If he upped his rebounding to at least above-average or good then I’d say he’s as good as Love, but until then I have my reservations. I’m rooting, and partially expecting, him to improve his rebounding next season now that Wallace and Camby have gone to other teams.

  • http://twitter.com/beasleyfacebash ac

    post-zone defense*, not offense

Advertisement